Injured Contractors In Afghanistan: Navigating The Complex World Of Compensation

The U.S. military spent $14 trillion during two decades of war in Afghanistan. While the U.S. lost its campaign to transform the country, many contractors won big. However, the human cost of the war has been high, with thousands of contractors losing their lives.

Contractors from Third Country Nationals (TCNs) performed work ranging from guarding convoys to cooking meals on bases, and from building installations to defusing mines. They often risked their lives for far less pay than their American counterparts. Official data indicate that in 2012, there were 86,100 U.S. soldiers and 36,826 TCN contractors working for the DoD in Afghanistan.

The U.S. Department of Labor confirmed that by March 31, 2021, a total of 1,822 civilian contractors were killed in Afghanistan. However, the true number may be higher as contractors and contracting companies have an incentive not to report incidents. Brown University's Costs of War project estimates that approximately 3,814 civilian contractors have died since the beginning of the war, exceeding the number of U.S. troop deaths.

The US military spent $14 trillion during two decades of war, with many contractors winning big

The US military spent $14 trillion during two decades of war in Afghanistan, with a significant portion of this money going to contractors. Up to half of the $14 trillion spent by the Pentagon since 9/11 went to for-profit defence contractors, with a large chunk of this money going to just five major corporations: Lockheed Martin, Boeing, General Dynamics, Raytheon, and Northrop Grumman.

The US military's heavy reliance on contractors is well-documented. Contractors performed a wide range of tasks, from guarding convoys and cooking meals to building installations and defusing mines. In the post-9/11 wars, contractors also handled war-zone logistics like running fuel convoys and staffing chow lines. In addition, contractors performed critical work like training and equipping Afghan security forces.

The use of contractors allowed the US to fight a war that many Americans forgot they were fighting. It also contributed to mission failures in Afghanistan. With the withdrawal of US troops and contractors, the Afghan security forces lost their advantage over the Taliban, as they lacked the knowledge to maintain US-provided aircraft and other equipment.

The US government's reliance on contractors has been criticised for leading to waste, fraud, and abuse. In addition, the billions of loosely monitored dollars poured into Afghanistan contributed to corruption and popular discontent with the US-backed government.

The human cost of the war has also been high, with thousands of contractors losing their lives. According to the Department of Labor, 1,774 civilian contractors have died in Afghanistan since the beginning of the war, although the true number may be higher.

While the US military's spending has benefited many contractors, the war in Afghanistan has also taken a toll on contractors, particularly those from poor countries who often face dangerous working conditions and exploitation by their employers.

Contractors provided key maintenance and military support, including training and gear maintenance

Contractors have played a crucial role in the US war effort in Afghanistan, providing key maintenance and military support. They have been responsible for everything from training and gear maintenance to intelligence gathering and close air support for battles against the Taliban.

The US military has relied on contractors to maintain advanced weapons systems, set up and operate communication networks, provide security, interpret foreign languages, and prepare meals, among other tasks. This support has been essential for the US military, especially in light of limits on the number of US military personnel in certain regions and a lack of specialised skills within the military.

The use of contractors has also allowed the US military to conserve scarce skills and ensure their availability for future deployments. Contractors often work alongside military personnel, facing similar risks and dangers.

In Afghanistan, a significant number of contractors were Third Country Nationals (TCNs), who came from poor countries in Asia, Africa, and Eastern Europe. These contractors performed a range of tasks, from guarding convoys to defusing mines, often for less pay than their American counterparts.

The departure of US government contractors from Afghanistan was a turning point in the Afghan military's collapse. The Afghan military had become heavily reliant on contractors, particularly for maintaining their air force. With the withdrawal of US forces and contractors, the Afghan military quickly lost its advantage over the Taliban.

The US military's increased reliance on contractors in Afghanistan and other conflicts has raised questions about accountability, oversight, and the potential for exploitation of vulnerable workers.

Contractors were essential for keeping most of the air platforms flying

The US military has relied heavily on contractors to support its troops in Afghanistan. These contractors have provided a range of services, from training and gear maintenance to intelligence gathering and close air support. Among these services, one of the most critical was the maintenance of air platforms.

The Afghan Air Force depended on US-supplied air power to maintain its advantage over the Taliban. However, they lacked the technical expertise to maintain these aircraft, particularly the more advanced ones such as Black Hawk helicopters and C-130 transport aircraft. As a result, contractors played a crucial role in keeping these air platforms operational.

Sean Carberry, who served in the US Department of Defense's inspector general office, emphasised the significance of contractors, stating, "Contractors were essential for keeping most of the air platforms flying." The departure of these contractors dealt a significant blow to the Afghan military, as they struggled to maintain their aircraft without this external support.

The US military itself also benefited from contractor support in maintaining its air platforms. With the presence of contractors, the military could focus on its core missions while relying on contractors for various support services. This division of labour helped ensure the smooth operation of military activities.

It is worth noting that contractors often faced greater risks than their American counterparts, yet earned significantly lower wages. They worked in dangerous conditions, with the constant threat of Taliban attacks. Despite their vital contributions, contractors were often exploited by their employers and lacked adequate legal protections.

In conclusion, contractors played an indispensable role in maintaining the air platforms of both the Afghan military and the US military. Their expertise and efforts were crucial in ensuring the functionality and readiness of these aircraft, which played a pivotal role in the conflict in Afghanistan.

Contractors from poor countries like Nepal are often exploited by their employers

Nepal is one of the poorest countries in Asia, making security jobs abroad appealing. Contractors are drawn to Afghanistan by the promise of steady employment and wages far higher than those in Nepal. However, they often face dangerous working conditions and are vulnerable in ways that their Western counterparts are not.

Contractors from Nepal are often housed in separate, inferior accommodations and are subject to different rules than Western contractors. For example, they may be restricted from leaving the compound or consuming alcohol during their leisure time. They are also paid far less than their American counterparts, even while taking greater risks.

In addition, contractors from Nepal often lack valid visas and work permits, putting them at risk of arrest and making them dependent on their employers for protection. They are often recruited through unofficial channels, including human traffickers, and may pay large sums of money to secure jobs that may not exist.

Contractors from Nepal are also at risk of injury or death while working in Afghanistan. In one notable incident, a Taliban suicide bomber killed 13 Nepalese contractors who were providing security for the Canadian Embassy in Kabul in 2016.

When injured or killed, contractors from Nepal often face challenges in obtaining proper compensation. They may be sent home with only token compensation or none at all. In some cases, employers fail to report claims or provide inadequate insurance coverage.

The exploitation of contractors from Nepal highlights the lack of transparency and accountability in the private security industry. It is essential to address these issues to protect the rights and safety of contractors working in dangerous conflict zones.

Contractors from poor countries are pulled into less transparent conflicts, making it more likely that they will be injured or killed

The War in Afghanistan has been one of the deadliest wars in recent history, with thousands of civilian contractors losing their lives. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, a total of 1,822 civilian contractors were killed in Afghanistan between 2001 and 2021, with 260 of those being private security contractors. The true number of contractor deaths is likely much higher, as the Pentagon does not keep track of these fatalities and many contractors are citizens of other countries, whose deaths may not be reported.

The use of private military contractors in war zones has become increasingly common, and they often perform some of the most dangerous tasks. These contractors are pulled from all over the world, including poor countries, and face a high risk of injury or death. The Congressional Research Service reported that private security contractors are four times more likely to be killed in Afghanistan than uniformed personnel. This is due to several factors that make contractors more vulnerable, such as a lack of training and protection, as well as the nature of their work, which often involves high-risk activities.

Additionally, contractors from poor countries may be more willing to take on risky jobs due to limited economic opportunities in their home countries. They may also lack access to adequate healthcare and protection, further increasing their risk of injury or death. The lack of media attention given to contractor casualties contributes to the public's misconception that violence and deaths are decreasing in war zones. As a result, the true human cost of these conflicts is often hidden from public view.

Furthermore, conflicts in developing countries are often fueled by economic inequalities, political instability, and social injustices. Poor countries are more prone to civil wars and armed conflicts due to these underlying factors. When contractors from these countries are pulled into less transparent conflicts, they become more vulnerable to injury or death. This is because these conflicts are often characterized by a breakdown in the rule of law, absent or co-opted state institutions, and a lack of accountability for human rights abuses.

Moreover, the nature of modern warfare has evolved with the advancement of technology. The use of drones, cyber-attacks, and autonomous weapons systems has further complicated the battlefield and increased the risk of civilian casualties. The blurring of lines between state and non-state actors, as well as the involvement of multiple countries and interests, has made it more difficult to hold parties accountable for human rights abuses and war crimes.

In conclusion, contractors from poor countries who are pulled into less transparent conflicts face a higher risk of injury or death due to a multitude of factors. These include the dangerous nature of their work, lack of protection and media attention, economic inequalities, political instability, and the evolving nature of warfare. It is crucial that the true human cost of these conflicts is recognized and that steps are taken to protect the lives of contractors, regardless of their country of origin.

Frequently asked questions