Belarus' Lukashenko: Are Viruses A Hoax?

Belarus is one of the few countries that did not impose any lockdown measures or restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic. This was despite the country having reported more than 40,000 cases as of 2022. In fact, life in Belarus remained largely unchanged, with football matches, religious services, and other mass gatherings continuing unimpeded. The country's President, Alexander Lukashenko, even went so far as to call the virus a psychosis and recommended unusual remedies such as drinking vodka and working in the fields. Lukashenko's refusal to acknowledge the severity of the pandemic and implement restrictions angered many Belarusians and led to an increase in opposition against his regime.

Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko's dismissal of the COVID-19 threat, calling it psychosis

In late March 2020, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko dismissed the threat of COVID-19, claiming that there were "no viruses" in Belarus and that the country did not need to impose any restrictions. Lukashenko's dismissal of the pandemic as "psychosis" and his refusal to implement lockdown measures stood in stark contrast to other countries' efforts to control the virus. While some nations, like Germany and Denmark, were cautiously reopening businesses and schools after successfully tamping down the initial outbreak, Belarus remained an outlier, with crowded public spaces, ongoing sporting events, and no social distancing measures in place.

Lukashenko's response to the pandemic was characterized by denial and a refusal to acknowledge the severity of the situation. He brushed aside reporters' questions, stating that he did not see any viruses "flying around." He also dismissed the official death toll, insisting that the victims, including a 297-pound man, had died from underlying causes, such as being overweight or smoking. Lukashenko's comments and actions set the tone for the country's response, with health officials following his lead and the public left with little recourse to challenge the government's approach.

The Belarusian leader's decision to downplay the pandemic and forgo restrictions was influenced by several factors. Firstly, he was facing re-election in August 2020 and feared that imposing a lockdown would lead to economic instability and unemployment payments that the country could not afford. Additionally, Lukashenko shared a mistrust of experts with former US President Donald Trump and believed that enhanced quarantines were not the best way to fight the virus. However, unlike Trump, Lukashenko had unlimited power to enforce his policies.

The consequences of Lukashenko's denial and inaction were dire. While the official numbers reported nearly 9,000 infections and 63 deaths, these figures were doubted, and there was anecdotal evidence that the actual number of cases and deaths was far higher. One example was the case of Aleksandr Matveyev's mother, who died from COVID-19 after being hospitalized for an unrelated issue. Her death was not reflected in the official death toll, and Matveyev accused Lukashenko of negligent homicide, blaming him for creating an atmosphere of denial and inaction.

As a result of Lukashenko's policies, Belarus faced the prospect of a devastating toll from the pandemic, with experts predicting the country could pay a terrible price. The true impact on human lives may never be fully known due to the suppression of information and the lack of a free press or viable opposition parties to hold the government accountable.

Lukashenko's advice to citizens to drink vodka and work in the fields to prevent COVID-19

As the COVID-19 pandemic swept the world, Belarus's President Alexander Lukashenko advised citizens to drink vodka and work in the fields to prevent infection. He claimed that vodka would "poison the virus", recommending: "You should drink the equivalent of 40–50 grams of the pure vodka daily." He also suggested that working outdoors was a protective measure, stating: "In the countryside, people are working in the fields, on tractors. No one is talking about the virus... There, the tractor will heal everyone. The fields heal everyone."

Lukashenko also encouraged Belarusians to visit saunas, claiming that the virus could not survive in the heat. He dismissed the idea of social distancing or quarantine, describing it as "utter stupidity" and psychosis. Shopping malls, public transportation, theatres, and restaurants remained open, and the premier soccer league continued to operate. Lukashenko's other suggestions included frequent hand-washing and playing ice hockey to prevent infection.

The Belarusian leader's approach stood in stark contrast to that of other world leaders, who implemented lockdowns, border closures, and bans on mass gatherings to curb the spread of the virus. Lukashenko's refusal to acknowledge the severity of the pandemic and his dissemination of questionable health advice put the country's citizens at risk. As of April 2020, Belarus had reported nearly 9,000 infections and 63 deaths, although these numbers were suspected to be underreported.

The Belarusian government's refusal to impose a nationwide lockdown

Under the rule of President Alexander Lukashenko, Belarus has refused to impose a nationwide lockdown to slow the spread of the coronavirus. In late March 2020, Lukashenko brushed aside reporters' anxious questions about the pandemic, stating "There are no viruses here. Do you see any of them flying around? I don't see them either."

At a time when many countries were imposing restrictions, Belarus remained an outlier, keeping restaurants, coffee shops, movie theatres, churches, and sports events open. While the raw numbers of infections and deaths in Belarus were not significantly higher than in other countries, there is evidence that the true numbers were being suppressed. Critics have called Lukashenko one of the world's foremost virus deniers, and his government's response to the pandemic has been described as "unnatural" and "unreasonable".

The Belarusian government's refusal to impose a lockdown has had significant impacts on the country. Firstly, it has left citizens vulnerable to the virus, with limited official guidance on how to protect themselves. Some Belarusians have taken it upon themselves to stay home and practice self-preservation, but many continue to attend crowded events and gatherings, putting themselves and others at risk.

Secondly, the refusal to acknowledge the severity of the pandemic and implement appropriate measures has likely led to a higher death toll. While Lukashenko claimed that the official death toll of 63 was due to underlying causes, experts predicted that the country could pay a terrible price for its lack of action. Anecdotal evidence suggests that the actual number of cases and deaths was far higher than reported. For example, the mother of Aleksandr Matveyev, a 68-year-old woman, died from COVID-19 after being admitted to the hospital for an unrelated issue. Matveyev believes that his mother's death was a direct result of the government's failure to take the pandemic seriously and set appropriate safety protocols.

Lastly, the economic implications of the Belarusian government's decision cannot be overlooked. While the country's financial situation was already precarious before the pandemic due to a dispute with Russia over oil imports, the decision to avoid a lockdown may have been motivated by a desire to avoid further economic instability. As Professor Daniel Triesman of UCLA points out, imposing a lockdown could have led to a healthy but impoverished population rising up against the government. Thus, the government prioritized economic stability over the health and safety of its citizens.

In conclusion, the Belarusian government's refusal to impose a nationwide lockdown during the coronavirus pandemic had far-reaching consequences. It led to a lack of official guidance and inadequate safety measures, likely resulting in a higher death toll and putting citizens at risk. Additionally, the decision was driven in part by economic concerns, prioritizing financial stability over public health. As a result, the Belarusian people have paid a high price, both in terms of lives lost and the ongoing threat of the virus.

Lukashenko's participation in an ice hockey game, claiming that there are no viruses here

In late March 2020, as the coronavirus pandemic swept the globe, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko participated in an amateur ice hockey game. After the game, he was confronted by reporters' anxious questions about the pandemic. Lukashenko, however, brushed aside these concerns, claiming, "There are no viruses here. Do you see any of them flying around? I don't see them either." This statement reflected his dismissal of the coronavirus threat and his refusal to impose any restrictions in Belarus to control the virus's spread.

Lukashenko's assertion that there were no viruses present in the crowded arena was not an isolated incident but part of a broader pattern of denial and inaction regarding the pandemic. Belarus stood out as an outlier among nations, as it never implemented any measures to curb the virus's transmission. Restaurants, coffee shops, movie theatres, churches, and sports events remained fully operational. Public transport and businesses continued as usual, with most workers required to show up in person.

Lukashenko's response to the pandemic was influenced by his autocratic rule and the upcoming August presidential election. He likened the coronavirus to a bad flu season and insisted that all reported deaths were due to underlying conditions. He criticized lockdowns elsewhere as "frenzy and psychosis" and claimed that Belarus had found a cure for COVID-19. This stance had severe consequences, as experts predicted Belarus could pay a terrible price for its lack of action.

The true impact of the virus in Belarus was difficult to ascertain due to a lack of transparency and suppression of information. Official tallies of infections and deaths were doubted, and anecdotal evidence suggested that the actual numbers were far higher. The lack of a free press and viable opposition parties left Belarusians with little recourse to challenge the government's response.

Lukashenko's participation in the ice hockey game and his subsequent comments set the tone for the country's approach to the pandemic. His dismissal of the virus's presence and the resulting lack of restrictions led to crowded public spaces and a continuation of everyday life, even as other nations grappled with lockdowns and cautious reopenings. This unusual response to the pandemic placed Belarus under international scrutiny and raised concerns about the potential cost in human lives.

The economic impact of the pandemic on Belarus, including decreased transparency in official reports

Under the rule of President Alexander Lukashenko, Belarus has never imposed any restrictions to slow the spread of the virus. Restaurants, coffee shops, movie theatres, churches, and sports stadiums have remained open throughout the pandemic. The country's leader has repeatedly denied the existence and the dangers of the virus, famously stating, "There are no viruses here. Do you see any of them flying around? I don't see them either."

Lukashenko's government has been criticised for a lack of transparency and accountability in its handling of the pandemic. The official death toll of 63 is widely believed to be inaccurate, with anecdotal evidence suggesting that the actual number of cases and deaths is far higher. The government's refusal to acknowledge the severity of the pandemic and implement basic public health measures has led to international condemnation and predictions of a terrible price to be paid by the country in the future.

The economic impact of the pandemic on Belarus is difficult to assess due to the lack of reliable data and the country's opaque reporting. However, it is clear that the pandemic has disrupted the country's economy, as it has elsewhere in the world. Belarus has sought to mitigate the economic fallout of the pandemic without resorting to populist measures, according to a political scientist from the Belarusian State Economic University. The country has relied on its manufacturing industry and agricultural exports to soften the economic blow, and some economic indicators suggest that Belarus has fared better than its neighbours.

The pandemic's impact on employment and specific industries in Belarus is unclear, but the country was already facing financial difficulties before the pandemic due to a dispute with Russia over oil imports. The government's decision to prioritise the economy over public health may have helped avoid a deeper recession, but it has likely come at a significant cost in human lives.

Frequently asked questions