Trans-Tasman Divide: Why Australia, New Zealand Should Part Ways

why should australia and new zealand be seperate countries

Australia and New Zealand are two separate countries with a shared history and close diplomatic relations. New Zealand was initially administered as part of the Colony of New South Wales but became a separate colony in 1840 or 1841 and a self-governing colony in 1852. In 1901, New Zealand declined to join the federation of Australia and instead became a Dominion in 1907. This decision was influenced by factors such as the distance between the two landmasses and the preference for New Zealand to remain an independent country. Despite their separate status, Australia and New Zealand have maintained friendly relations and have collaborated in various areas, including during World War II and through economic agreements. There have been discussions about the possibility of a political union or a single currency, but these ideas have not come to fruition.

Characteristics Values
Distance 1,200 miles of ocean
Population Australia had a much larger penal colony population, while New Zealand's European population numbered about 2,000
Economic rivalry New Zealand's trade was mostly with the United Kingdom, while Australia was seen as an economic rival
Separate colonies New Zealand became a separate colony from New South Wales in 1840/1841 and a self-governing colony in 1852
Independent country New Zealand declined to join the federation of Australia in 1901 and became a Dominion in 1907
Currency Both countries had their own currencies, the Australian dollar and the New Zealand dollar
Legal systems Differences in legal systems, reflecting the preferences of stakeholders and democratic decision-making processes in each country
Trade Signed a Free Trade Agreement in 1965/1983, increasing trans-Tasman trade
Military Maintained separate military commands during World War II

shunculture

Distance: 1,200 miles of ocean separates the two countries

Australia and New Zealand are separated by more than 900 miles of ocean. The Tasman Sea, which separates the two countries, covers a distance of approximately 1,491 kilometres (926 miles) at its closest point between Australia's island state of Tasmania and New Zealand's South Island. This vast stretch of water has played a significant role in shaping the distinct identities and histories of the two nations.

The distance between Australia and New Zealand has been a notable factor in their decision to remain separate countries. In the past, there have been discussions about the potential unification of the two nations. However, the physical separation between them has been cited as a significant impediment to this idea. New Zealand's Premier, Sir John Hall, once remarked, "Nature has made 1,200 impediments to the inclusion of New Zealand in any such federation in the 1,200 miles of stormy ocean which lies between us and our brethren in Australia."

This ocean separation highlights the independence and sovereignty of each country. The Tasman Sea not only presents a geographical challenge but also symbolises the unique maritime environments and ecosystems that each nation possesses. The distance between them has fostered the development of distinct cultural, social, and economic characteristics, shaping their individual identities on the world stage.

Despite the distance, Australia and New Zealand have enjoyed friendly diplomatic relations for centuries. They have a shared history of British colonisation and have worked together during significant historical events, such as World War II, when they signed the Canberra Pact in 1944. Additionally, both nations have experienced internal conflicts with their indigenous and settler populations, although these conflicts manifested in different forms.

The separation of 1,200 miles of ocean has allowed Australia and New Zealand to forge their own paths while maintaining a close relationship. This distance has enabled them to develop unique identities, governance structures, and economic systems, contributing to their status as separate and independent countries. While they may be geographically distant, Australia and New Zealand continue to foster strong ties and collaborate on matters of mutual interest.

shunculture

Political union: New Zealand declined to join the Commonwealth of Australia in 1901

New Zealand declined to join the Commonwealth of Australia in 1901, instead becoming a Dominion in 1907 and effectively a separate nation. There were several factors in this decision. Firstly, the distance between the two landmasses was a consideration, with 1,200 miles of ocean between them. New Zealand Premier, Richard Seddon, referenced this distance in his statement that there were "1200 reasons not to join Australia".

Secondly, New Zealand had a different economic focus, with most of its trade being with the United Kingdom, whereas Australia was seen as an economic rival. New Zealand also had a different perspective on its future, with the New Zealand Times writing that the country would become "a mother among the Pacific Islands", and that acquiring Pacific Islands would justify staying out of the Commonwealth. This vision of an island federation or Dominion of Oceania would be equal to the Australian Commonwealth.

Thirdly, New Zealand preferred its independent status, and the Premier Richard Seddon wished to be the leader of an independent country rather than an Australian state. A Royal Commission was set up in 1900 to gauge public opinion, and most submissions opposed union with Australia. New Zealand had participated in Australian colonial conferences since the 1860s, but the majority view was that New Zealanders were of superior stock to their Australian counterparts.

Finally, there were differences in the legal systems of the two countries, which New Zealand wished to preserve. The New Zealand government submissions to the Australian federal parliamentary committee in 2006 noted that the differences were not a problem in themselves but were the product of well-functioning democratic decision-making processes in each country. Despite close economic integration and a shared history as British colonies, the two countries have maintained separate political paths.

Venus Flytrap Care Guide for Australians

You may want to see also

shunculture

Economic rivalry: In the early 1900s, New Zealand viewed Australia as an economic rival

New Zealand and Australia have had a long history of economic ties and shared interests, but there have also been periods of rivalry and competition. In the early 1900s, New Zealand's economy was closely linked with the United Kingdom, and it viewed Australia as an economic rival. This rivalry can be traced back to the 1800s, when New Zealand began to restructure its economy around the export of lamb, butter, and wool to the British market. While New Zealand traded primarily with Britain, the other Australian colonies traded more amongst themselves. As such, the rationale for Australian federation—to reduce intercolonial customs barriers and create a common market—did not appeal to New Zealand's political and economic elite.

New Zealand's economic ties with the UK were strengthened by the development of refrigerated shipping, which allowed the country to export meat and dairy products to Britain. These exports became prominent in the 1890s, just as wool prices recovered from a weak period in the mid-1870s to mid-1880s. New Zealand's economy, however, faced challenges due to uncertainty about export receipts, the need to maintain domestic demand, and a weak manufacturing sector. After World War II, New Zealand's economy fell behind, and it struggled with a series of economic crises in the 1970s and early 1980s, including oil crises, rising inflation, and increasing unemployment.

During this period, New Zealand and Australia continued to have economic ties, with the signing of a partial New Zealand-Australia Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1965. Despite initial concerns, New Zealand firms found they could compete in the Australian market, which had high tariffs against imports from other parts of the world. The Closer Economic Relations (CER) agreement of 1983 further strengthened economic ties between the two countries, and trans-Tasman trade increased by 9% per annum from the early 1980s through to 2007. Additionally, both countries adjusted their currencies to be pegged to the US dollar in 1971, with New Zealand following Australia's lead in decimalising its monetary unit in 1967.

While there have been discussions and proposals for further economic integration, including a single currency and more common markets, the two countries have maintained separate economic systems. New Zealand's decision to decline federation with Australia in the early 1900s and its focus on trade with the UK, along with the economic challenges it faced in the mid-20th century, contributed to a period of economic rivalry with Australia. However, their shared economic history and eventual cooperation, particularly in the latter half of the 20th century, also highlight the complex and evolving nature of their economic relationship.

Queen Elizabeth's Global Currency Legacy

You may want to see also

shunculture

Trade: New Zealand's trade was mostly with the UK, unlike Australia

New Zealand and Australia have historically had differing trade relationships with the UK. New Zealand's trade was mostly with the UK, while Australia's was not.

New Zealand's economic ties with the UK were strong, particularly in the trade of meat and dairy. The development of refrigerated shipping in the 20th century allowed New Zealand to base its economy on the export of these goods to Britain. Australia also exported meat and dairy, but New Zealand's trade with the UK was more focused on these products.

In the early 1970s, Britain joined the European Economic Community, which restricted access to New Zealand's biggest export market. This was a turning point for New Zealand, which then had to look elsewhere for trade.

In 1983, New Zealand and Australia concluded the Australia New Zealand Closer Economic Relations Trade Agreement (ANZCERTA), which allowed each country access to the other's markets. This was a significant shift for New Zealand, as it had previously relied heavily on the UK for trade.

The two countries have since continued to develop their economic relationship, with the Closer Economic Relations free trade agreement and its predecessors inspiring ever-converging economic integration. In 1996, they signed the Trans-Tasman Mutual Recognition Arrangement (TTMRA), which facilitates the free flow of goods and skilled personnel between the two countries.

In 2023, New Zealand and Australia negotiated separate trade agreements with the UK, which came into force at the end of May. These agreements cover a wide range of areas, including trade in goods and services, sanitary and phytosanitary measures, technical barriers to trade, financial services, and more.

shunculture

Indigenous relations: The two countries have had different approaches to their indigenous populations

Australia and New Zealand have had differing approaches to their indigenous populations, with New Zealand taking steps towards recognising and addressing historical injustices, while Australia has been criticised for its lack of engagement with Indigenous communities.

New Zealand, home to the indigenous Polynesian Māori people, has taken several measures to acknowledge and address the wrongs of the past. The Treaty of Waitangi, signed in 1840, marked a significant step in the coexistence of Māori and European cultures. The Treaty of Waitangi Act of 1975 furthered the recognition of Māori rights, establishing the Waitangi Tribunal to address claims relating to the treaty's principles. While the Tribunal's recommendations are not binding, they represent a commitment to addressing historical grievances. The status of Māori as the indigenous people of New Zealand is legally recognised through the term "tangata whenua", affirming their connection to the land.

In 2019, the New Zealand government demonstrated its commitment to Māori rights by endorsing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UN DRIP) and developing a plan for its implementation. Additionally, the Electoral (Entrenchment of Maori Seats) Amendment Bill, introduced in the same year, aimed to protect Māori representation in Parliament.

On the other hand, Australia has faced criticism for its engagement with Indigenous communities, particularly Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. While the Australian government acknowledges the Traditional Owners of Country and their connection to the land, there is a perceived lack of genuine engagement with Indigenous communities. The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples calls for obtaining the free, prior, and informed consent of Indigenous people before adopting legislative or administrative measures that affect them, yet Australia has been criticised for not having a comprehensive legal framework or treaty that enshrines the rights of its Indigenous peoples.

Australia's history with its Indigenous populations has been marked by conflict, with the Australian frontier wars causing significant harm. While there have been attempts to foster better relationships, such as the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) targets, the effectiveness of these efforts has been questioned. Australia's approach to Indigenous relations differs from New Zealand's in that it has not achieved the same level of mutual trust and power-sharing that New Zealand strives for through initiatives like the Waitangi Tribunal.

Frequently asked questions

New Zealand was separated from the Colony of New South Wales in 1840 and became a self-governing colony in 1852. New Zealand declined to join the federation of Australia in 1901.

The Tasman Sea separates the two countries, with a distance of more than 1,491 km (926 miles).

Australia has a much larger penal colony population compared to New Zealand, which had about 2,000 European settlers in 1840.

Both countries have secular common law legal systems and experienced ongoing internal conflict concerning indigenous and settler populations. They also signed the Canberra Pact in 1944 and a Free Trade Agreement in 1965.

While there is little prospect of political union now, there have been discussions about a single currency and more common markets.

Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment