The Afghanistan War: A Tale Of Strategic Missteps And Misguided Nation-Building

The US war in Afghanistan was the longest war in US history. It began in 2001, in response to the 9/11 attacks, and ended in 2021, with the withdrawal of US troops and the return of the Taliban to power.

The war was initiated with the clear objective of defeating al-Qaeda and its Taliban hosts and preventing a repeat of the 9/11 attacks. By December of that year, American and coalition partners defeated the Taliban government. However, the war continued for almost two decades, with shifting priorities and strategies.

There are several reasons why the war in Afghanistan failed. Firstly, there was a lack of a clear and cohesive strategy and objectives. The war effort was also hampered by frequent changes in administration, resulting in shifting priorities and a lack of long-term commitment. The US also failed to understand the Afghan context and tailor its efforts accordingly, including the social, economic, and political dynamics. This led to a disconnect between the programs implemented and the needs and wants of the Afghan people.

Another factor was the constant turnover of US personnel, which negatively impacted reconstruction efforts. The US also struggled with counterproductive civilian and military personnel policies, often deploying unqualified and poorly trained individuals.

Additionally, the US underestimated the time and resources needed for reconstruction, leading to short-term solutions that were not sustainable in the long run. The lack of a clear reconstruction strategy and coordination among agencies further contributed to the failure.

Furthermore, corruption was a significant issue, with the US inadvertently fostering corruption by focusing on short-term gains and failing to address the underlying issues.

The war also diverted attention and resources away from other critical areas, such as countering narcotics. Despite billions of dollars spent, Afghanistan remains the largest producer of opium, which finances America's enemies.

Finally, the US failed to adequately monitor and evaluate the impact of its efforts. This lack of oversight and accountability led to a disconnect between the reported successes and the reality on the ground.

The US failed to understand the Afghan context and tailor its efforts accordingly

The US struggled to develop a coherent strategy, understand how long the reconstruction mission would take, ensure its projects were sustainable, staff the mission with trained professionals, account for the challenges posed by insecurity, tailor efforts to the Afghan context, and understand the impact of programs.

The US was devoid of a fundamental understanding of Afghanistan. The US did not know what it was doing. The US was operating in the dark, often because of the difficulty of collecting the necessary information. The US clumsily forced Western technocratic models onto Afghan economic institutions; trained security forces in advanced weapon systems they could not understand, much less maintain; imposed formal rule of law on a country that addressed 80 to 90% of its disputes through informal means; and often struggled to understand or mitigate the cultural and social barriers to supporting women and girls.

The US did not have the necessary mindset, expertise, and resources to develop and manage the strategy to rebuild Afghanistan. The US was simply not equipped to undertake something this ambitious in such an uncompromising environment, no matter the budget.

The US government continuously struggled to develop and implement a coherent strategy

The US government's failure to develop and implement a coherent strategy in Afghanistan is a critical factor that contributed to the war's overall failure. This lack of strategic coherence led to significant challenges and ultimately hindered the achievement of US objectives in the country.

The Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) conducted an extensive investigation, reviewing thousands of government documents and conducting over 760 interviews. The report revealed a "troubled reconstruction effort" characterised by numerous failures and some limited successes. One of the key conclusions was that the US government consistently struggled to formulate and execute a well-defined strategy.

This struggle was partly due to the absence of a single agency with the necessary expertise, mindset, and resources to effectively manage the strategy for rebuilding Afghanistan. As a result, there was a poor division of labour, leading to a weak overall strategy. Domestic political considerations further complicated matters, as US officials prioritised their own ideological preferences over realistic assessments of what could be achieved on the ground. This disconnect between policy and reality resulted in conditions in Afghanistan being overlooked, leading to reckless compromises and perverse incentives to achieve unattainable short-term goals.

Additionally, the US failed to adequately consider local socio-economic and political dynamics, which had significant consequences. Resources intended for specific programs ended up enriching local power brokers and inadvertently funding insurgents. This misallocation of resources exacerbated existing issues and hindered progress toward stabilising and reconstructing Afghanistan.

The US mission in Afghanistan was also undermined by unrealistic timelines and expectations. There was a consistent underestimation of the time required for reconstruction, leading to increased corruption and reduced program effectiveness. The magnitude of the rebuilding project overwhelmed the US, and the overall impact of their efforts was limited.

Furthermore, the decision-making of the Obama and Trump administrations reflected a consensus to maintain a relatively small troop presence and expenditure in Afghanistan. This approach, coupled with the flawed deal negotiated with the Taliban by the Trump Administration, contributed to the haste and indifference exhibited in the withdrawal process. The Biden Administration's subsequent review of the situation was influenced by a desire to avoid a potential escalation of violence and a derailment of its foreign policy agenda.

The US did not adequately train its personnel

The U.S. government has spent $83 billion on training, equipping, and paying the Afghan security forces since 2001. However, the U.S. personnel in Afghanistan were often unqualified and poorly trained, and those who were qualified were difficult to retain. The U.S. personnel were rotated out every 6-9 months, leaving successors to start from scratch and make the same mistakes all over again.

The U.S. government's inability to get the right people into the right jobs at the right times was one of the most significant failures of the mission. It is also one of the hardest to repair. The U.S. personnel in Afghanistan were often unqualified and poorly trained, and those who were qualified were difficult to retain. The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) police advisors watched American TV shows to learn about policing, civil affairs teams were mass-produced via PowerPoint presentations, and every agency experienced annual lobotomies as staff constantly rotated out, leaving successors to start from scratch and make similar mistakes all over again.

The US did not provide enough oversight, monitoring, and evaluation to understand the impact of their efforts

The U.S. government continuously struggled to develop and implement a coherent strategy for what it hoped to achieve. The U.S. government consistently underestimated the amount of time required to rebuild Afghanistan, and created unrealistic timelines and expectations that prioritized spending quickly. These choices increased corruption and reduced the effectiveness of programs.

U.S. agencies rarely conducted sufficient monitoring and evaluation to understand the impact of their efforts.

The US did not have a clear reconstruction strategy and no single military service, agency, or country was in charge of reconstruction efforts

The US reconstruction strategy in Afghanistan lacked clear direction and coordination, with various agencies and countries involved, each with their own agenda. The US Agency for International Development (USAID) operated without a comprehensive strategy in 2004, and even after a long-term strategy was approved in July 2005, it lacked a performance management plan to monitor project performance and ensure proper management and oversight. This made it difficult for decision-makers to effectively allocate resources and measure progress towards the goal of creating a stable Afghan society.

The US reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan were hindered by a lack of coordination and a clear chain of command. Multiple agencies and countries were involved, including the US Department of State, the Afghan government, the UK, G-8 partners, the UN, and private contractors. Each had their own agenda and priorities, which made it challenging to develop a cohesive and effective reconstruction plan.

The US aimed to establish Afghanistan as a democratic nation, countering terrorism, drug trafficking, and cultivation, and providing its own internal and external security. To achieve this, the US provided support to create national security institutions, offered humanitarian and reconstruction assistance, and worked to strengthen the central government's authority. However, these efforts were often fragmented and lacked a unified vision.

One example of the challenges faced in reconstruction efforts was the issue of opium production in Afghanistan. The US supported the UK in counter-narcotics efforts, while the Afghan government focused on alternative livelihood programs and building law enforcement capacity. However, weak institutions, corrupt officials, and powerful warlords and drug traffickers hindered the implementation of the opium ban. Insecurity in poppy-growing areas also limited the ability of NGOs to implement and monitor development programs.

The lack of a clear reconstruction strategy and coordinated effort impacted the success of the US mission in Afghanistan. Without a unified vision and effective implementation, the reconstruction efforts were hindered, and the goal of a stable and secure Afghanistan remained elusive.

Frequently asked questions