Media's Influence In Bolivia: A Complex Relationship

Bolivia has a constitutionally free press, though it has been subject to periodic censorship during dictatorial regimes. The media landscape is dominated by private media outlets, with nearly 200 privately-owned television stations and more than 480 radio stations as of 2006. The country also has eight national newspapers, in addition to many local ones. The media plays an important role in Bolivia's political landscape, with both pro-government and anti-government groups attacking media outlets in response to their reporting. The government has been accused of using legal, political, and economic means to pressure independent media, and self-censorship is common among journalists out of fear of reprisal. Despite these challenges, the media in Bolivia has experienced a boom in recent years, with the growth and proliferation of party politics leading to a corresponding expansion in the communications industry.

Media freedom in Bolivia

Bolivia's constitution protects freedom of the press and speech. However, in practice, the country's media environment is fraught with challenges, including violence against journalists, censorship, and government interference.

The Bolivian government exerts control over numerous newspapers and has intensified its monitoring of critical media, especially on social media platforms. This scrutiny has led to self-censorship among journalists, who fear retaliation for their reporting. The government also leverages its advertising spending power to influence media outlets, denying funding to those that are deemed to "play party politics" or "insult" the administration.

Attacks, threats, censorship, and harassment by government and pro-government forces are constant threats to press freedom in Bolivia. Journalists face intimidation, harassment, physical assaults, equipment theft, and radio and television censorship. The Catholic Church has also historically maintained a strong presence in the country's media landscape, exerting its influence through an extensive network.

The period of political turmoil surrounding the resignation and forced exile of President Evo Morales in 2019 witnessed a surge in abuses against the press. Journalists became targets of violence, intimidation, and arbitrary arrests, with many killings of journalists going unpunished. This trend continued under the administration of Luis Arce, who was elected in 2020, with physical attacks against journalists intensifying, especially in rural areas.

The concentration of media ownership in Bolivia is also a concern, as it jeopardises pluralism and independent reporting. The leading newspapers, "El Deber" and "El Diario", and the most popular TV channel, "Canal Sur", exemplify this concentration.

While the country's diverse media landscape includes privately owned television stations, radio stations, and newspapers, the challenges posed by government interference, violence, and self-censorship undermine media freedom in Bolivia.

Indigenous voices in the media

Bolivia is a plurinational state with 36 recognised Indigenous peoples, including the Aymara, Quechua, Chiquitano, Guaraní, and Moxeño. According to the 2012 National Census, 41% of the population over 15 years of age are of Indigenous origin, although this percentage is likely to have increased to 48% as of 2017.

Despite these advances, many Indigenous communities continue to face challenges, particularly in relation to land rights and the country's extractive industries. A highly contentious issue is the proposed road across the Isiboro-Sécure Indigenous Territory and National Park (TIPNIS) in the Bolivian Amazon, which has been opposed by Indigenous activists and led to protests and marches, including the IX Indigenous March in 2012.

The media has played a significant role in covering these issues and amplifying Indigenous voices. Social media platforms, such as Twitter, have been used extensively to organise and show support for Indigenous marches and to criticise the government's response. Additionally, mass media outlets have offered wide coverage of Indigenous protests through news and analytical articles, providing a platform for Indigenous leaders to highlight their objectives and demands.

Furthermore, the rise of Indigenous-led media outlets, such as Jichha, has provided a dedicated space for exploring and building Indianist social change across the Andes. Jichha, founded by Indigenous thinker and writer Wilmer Machaca, serves as a digital platform for debating, disseminating books and texts, and exploring Indianist decolonisation and liberation. It has allowed for the creation of a community that transcends republican borders, fostering a sense of common identity among Andean peoples.

In addition to digital media, radio has played a crucial role in reaching rural areas, where television reception is often poor. Radio stations, such as Education Through Radio in Bolivia (ERBOL), have provided a platform for Indigenous voices and have gradually taken a more critical stance towards the government, becoming a target for verbal attacks by President Morales.

Despite the progress made in amplifying Indigenous voices in the media, challenges remain. The government has been accused of increasing monitoring of critical media and using legal, political, and economic means to pressure independent media outlets. Self-censorship is commonplace, and journalists often fear losing their jobs if they report critically on the authorities.

Nevertheless, the increasing presence of Indigenous voices in the media, both through traditional outlets and alternative platforms, has been a significant development in Bolivia, contributing to the ongoing struggle for Indigenous rights and representation.

Government control of the media

The Bolivian constitution protects freedom of the press and speech, and both state-owned and privately-owned radio stations operate without government censorship. However, some restrictions exist, and the Penal Code demands jail time for those found guilty of slandering, insulting, or defaming public officials.

Historically, Bolivian governments have recognised the political significance of the media and attempted to censor channels used by the opposition. In the 1940s, the Revolutionary Nationalist Movement (MNR) utilised the daily newspaper 'La Calle' to mobilise support for its cause. During the revolution, the MNR purged news media that didn't align with their views and established 'La Nación' as the official news organisation. Military governments, in particular, subjected journalists to harassment, jail terms, and exile.

In the early 1980s, General García Meza closed down several radio stations and ordered the creation of a state-run network that bound all private stations. Many journalists were imprisoned and their reports censored. However, after 1982, freedom of the press developed as a byproduct of the democratisation of Bolivian politics. Despite government restrictions, the media experienced a boom in the mid-1980s, with newspapers, television, and radio stations proliferating during the 1984-85 electoral season.

In recent years, the government has controlled numerous newspapers and stepped up monitoring of critical media, especially on social networks. Officials use legal, political, and economic means to pressure independent media, and self-censorship is commonplace due to fear of job loss. Media that is deemed to "play party politics" or "insult" the government is denied funding from state advertising.

The state-owned television network, Bolivia TV, is viewed as a mouthpiece for the central government rather than a formal state channel. Its coverage primarily focuses on the actions of the president and the governing party, often introducing reporters with statements such as, "Now we are going to interview residents of this town so that they can express their satisfaction with the new public works carried out by the government of President Morales." The government has also created rural radio stations that mostly rebroadcast programming from the state-run station, Radio Illimani, later renamed Radio Patria Nueva.

In January 2009, the government established Cambio, a state-financed newspaper with nationwide circulation that represents the interests and ideology of the central government.

Media ownership in Bolivia

Bolivia has a free press, protected by the constitution, though some restrictions exist. The Penal Code, for example, demands jail time for those found guilty of slandering, insulting, or defaming public officials.

The government also controls several newspapers and a TV station, Bolivia TV (Canal 7), which is generally viewed as a mouthpiece for the central government. During the Morales administration, the network demonstrated militant support for the ruling party, the Movement Toward Socialism (MAS). The government also operates a state-run community radio network, Red Patria Nueva, which consists of nearly 50 rural radio stations.

In addition, the government established a state-financed newspaper, Cambio, in 2009. The daily represents the interests and ideology of the central government and has nationwide circulation.

Media as a tool for social change

Bolivia has a constitutionally free press, with nearly 200 privately-owned television stations, over 480 radio stations, and eight national newspapers, in addition to many local ones. The media in Bolivia plays a significant role in social change, with most newspapers taking anti-government positions.

The country's political and economic situation has contributed to the formation of new power blocs that intervene in national politics through the mainstream media, polarising public opinion. The rise to power of a leader with indigenous roots and a leftist discourse, such as Evo Morales, "scared" the commercial media. The rhetorical aggressiveness of the head of state unsettled the mainstream media and even some journalists. This led to a tense relationship between the government and the media, with the administration claiming that the private media manipulates information to promote a climate of instability.

On the other hand, media owners and journalists maintain that they are merely exercising their right to criticism by pointing out the administration's inconsistencies. They argue that the government's discourse on topics such as the Constituent Assembly, the supposed nationalisation of oil and gas, and regional autonomy does not match the measures actually taken. The media in Bolivia subscribes to ideological positions that favour a philosophy of social change but reject the present political leadership.

Social media platforms like Twitter have also played an increasingly important role in political expression and mobilisation in Bolivia. During the IX Indigenous March in 2012, for example, Twitter was abuzz with messages of support for the marchers and criticism of the government's indifferent attitude. This eruption of commentary and debate within a limited character space was a new development in the country's political landscape.

Despite the tensions between the government and the media, Bolivia has invested more public resources in strengthening media outlets than any previous administration. The government has also taken steps towards improving media freedom and access, such as allocating 17% of radio and television frequencies to social and community-based media, and recognising the right to information in the constitution. However, there is still a lack of Indigenous voices in the media, and internet access remains sluggish and costly, hindering the country's media development.

Frequently asked questions