Austria's Unification: A Germany United Under One Emperor

The unification of Germany in 1871 was primarily Prussian-led, by Otto Von Bismarck. However, this was not the only possible outcome. Austria and Prussia were in competition for the leading position in the unification process, and there were two possible solutions to this problem, both of which threatened the Habsburg Monarchy's existence. The first was the unification of German-speaking lands without Austria, and the second was the inclusion of Austria, which was problematic due to the multi-ethnic composition of the Habsburg Monarchy. Ultimately, Prussia prevailed, and Austria was excluded from the German Empire. However, this alternate history scenario raises interesting questions about how the course of history, including World War I and World War II, may have been different if Austria had unified Germany instead.

The Holy Roman Empire may have continued until the present day

The Holy Roman Empire, which included Austria until 1806, could have continued until the present day if Austria had unified Germany. This alternate history hinges on a few key moments:

Firstly, the Holy Roman Empire would have needed to resist the forces of Napoleon, which ultimately led to its dissolution in 1806. A victory for the Franco-Spanish-Austrian-Russian coalition in the Seven Years' War could have cemented Austria's authority in the Empire and prevented Revolutionary France from winning most of the French Revolutionary Wars. This may have resulted in the restoration of Louis XVI as a puppet king and hindered European democracy for at least a century.

Secondly, the Habsburgs would have needed to successfully unite the Holy Roman Empire into a single nation. This could have been achieved with a favourable outcome in the Austro-Prussia War, with French support, and the formation of two semi-loose confederations of German and non-German territories, united under the Habsburgs in Vienna.

Thirdly, the 'greater-German solution' would have needed to be implemented, including Austria in the unification of German-speaking lands. This was problematic due to the multi-ethnic composition of the Habsburg Monarchy, as only certain parts of Austria, namely the Alpine and Danube lands and the lands of the Bohemian crown, would have been included. However, if the 'greater-German solution' had been pursued, it could have prevented the crisis in Prussian-Austrian relations that culminated in Austria's defeat at the Battle of Königgrätz in 1866, preserving Austria's leading position in the German-speaking world.

Finally, the unification of Germany under Austrian leadership would have needed to occur earlier than 1871, possibly as early as the 1848 period or the Revolutions of 1848. This would have changed the conditions that led to World War I and, by extension, World War II.

In this alternate history, a strong German Empire under the Habsburgs may have led to the Risorgimento not happening unless Britain and Russia intervened on the side of Two-Sicilies and Piedmont-Sardinia. World War I, in this scenario, may have been a conflict between Germany, France, and the Ottoman Empire against Russia, Britain, and Italy.

Austria would have been the main pillar of the German Confederation

If Austria had unified Germany, it would have become the main pillar of the German Confederation. This would have significantly altered the course of history, potentially changing the outcomes of World War I and World War II.

The Austrian Empire, or any other German nation besides Prussia, had united Germany, it would have been a powerful force in Europe. Austria had ruled the Holy Roman Empire for centuries and had a strong claim to leadership in the German-speaking world. However, they were unable to unite the empire into a single nation and were forced to dissolve it due to Napoleon's conquests.

In the 1870s, Prussia, led by Otto von Bismarck, took the initiative and unified Germany without Austria. This exclusion of Austria from the German Empire created a rivalry between the two powers and had far-reaching consequences for the Habsburg Monarchy's internal stability. The 'smaller-German solution', which unified the German-speaking lands without Austria, raised concerns in Vienna about the potential for separatist movements within Austria.

If Austria had unified Germany, it would have become the dominant force in Central Europe. The Habsburgs would have likely established an empire stretching from the Baltic to the Black Sea, encompassing the Alpine and Danube lands and the lands of the Bohemian crown. This would have created a powerful multi-ethnic empire, challenging the balance of power in Europe.

The presence of a strong Austrian-led German Empire would have altered the dynamics of World War I. It is speculated that Revolutionary France would have been prevented from winning most of the French Revolutionary Wars, and the German forces might have restored Louis XVI as their puppet king. The absence of Napoleonic rule could have hindered European democracy for at least a century.

Additionally, the existence of a unified Germany under Austrian rule might have changed the course of World War II. The factors that led to the rise of Nazism and the invasion of Poland might not have been present, potentially avoiding the outbreak of the war altogether.

The German Confederation may have become a federal state

The German Confederation was created in 1815 as a replacement for the former Holy Roman Empire, which had been dissolved in 1806 as a result of the Napoleonic Wars. It was an association of 39 predominantly German-speaking sovereign states in Central Europe.

In the context of unification, Austria's involvement put the Habsburg Monarchy in a dangerous situation as it meant competing with Prussia for the leading position. There were two possible solutions to this problem, both of which threatened the Monarchy's existence. The first was the unification of German-speaking lands without Austria, which could have led to separatism among Germans within Austria. The second scenario included Austria, but only certain parts, as the remaining parts of the Monarchy had non-German-speaking majorities and would have to be excluded, breaking up the territorial unity of the Habsburg Monarchy.

If the German Confederation had become a federal state, it is possible that the Habsburg Monarchy would have pursued one of these two scenarios, risking its existence. The unification of Germany under Austria may have resulted in a greater-German solution, with Austria included in the federal state. However, this would have likely required a shift in power dynamics, as Prussia was determined to become the main pillar of the German Confederation.

The formation of a federal state may have also influenced the subsequent wars. If Austria had become the German power, it is possible that World War I and World War II would not have occurred, or at least, the factors leading to these wars would have been different.

The Habsburg Monarchy may have ended

Firstly, the rise of nationalism in the 19th century posed a significant challenge to the multiethnic Habsburg Monarchy. The idea of Romantic nationalism, which asserted that shared language or ethnic background led to a shared national consciousness, threatened to break up the diverse territories ruled by the Habsburgs. Germans in Bohemia discriminated against Czechs, Poles in Galicia against Ukrainians, and Slovenians in Gorizia against Italians, among other nationalist movements. These competing national interests made it increasingly difficult for the Habsburg Monarchy to maintain control over its territories.

Secondly, the multiethnic composition of the monarchy itself presented a threat to its unity. The "greater-German solution," which envisioned the inclusion of Austria in a unified Germany, faced challenges due to the non-German-speaking populations within the Habsburg Monarchy. This solution would have excluded significant parts of the monarchy, such as the remaining non-German-speaking territories, thereby breaking up the territorial unity of the Habsburg Monarchy.

Lastly, the competing interests of Prussia and Austria played a crucial role in the eventual dissolution of the Habsburg Monarchy. Prussia, under Otto von Bismarck, sought to exclude Austrian lands from a unified Germany and succeeded in doing so by defeating Austria in the Austro-Prussian War in 1866. This loss marked the end of Austria's leading position in the German-speaking world and paved the way for the "smaller-German solution," which resulted in the proclamation of the German Reich in 1871 without Austria.

In conclusion, the end of the Habsburg Monarchy can be attributed to the rise of nationalism, the multiethnic nature of the monarchy, and the rivalry between Prussia and Austria. These factors ultimately led to the dissolution of the monarchy and the formation of new nation-states in the former Habsburg territories following World War I.

World War II may not have happened

If Austria had unified Germany instead of Prussia, World War II may not have happened. This counterfactual hinges on the idea that a unified Germany under Austrian rule would have been significantly different from its Prussian counterpart, thereby altering the course of history and preventing the factors that led to World War II from arising.

Firstly, it is important to understand the context of Austrian and Prussian competition for the unification of Germany. In the mid-19th century, the German Confederation, which included Austrian and Prussian territories, was a loose collection of German-speaking lands. The unification of these lands into a single German nation-state was a growing aspiration among Germans. However, the multi-ethnic composition of the Austrian Habsburg Monarchy presented a challenge, as only certain parts of Austria, namely the Alpine and Danube lands and the lands of the Bohemian crown, could be included in a unified German state. This "greater-German solution" threatened the territorial unity of the Habsburg Monarchy, as the remaining non-German-speaking parts would be excluded. On the other hand, excluding Austria from the unification process, known as the "smaller-German solution", risked encouraging separatism among Germans within Austria, endangering the Monarchy's stability.

In the event that history played out differently, and Austria won the war with Prussia in 1866, it could have potentially unified the German Confederation to form an Austria-centred German Empire. This would have significant implications for the future of Germany and Europe as a whole. With Austria as the dominant power, the German Empire's capital could have been in Vienna, and the Empire's character would have been influenced by the multi-ethnic nature of the Habsburg Monarchy. This could have potentially led to a more inclusive and diverse German state, in contrast to the more ethnically homogeneous Prussia-dominated Empire that historically came to be.

The impact of an Austrian-unified Germany on the course of history is speculative, but it is possible that World War II may not have occurred. The rise of Nazism and Hitler's aggressive expansionist policies were key factors in the lead-up to World War II. However, with a different power dynamic in a unified Germany, it is uncertain if Hitler would have risen to power or if his ideology would have gained traction. Additionally, an Austrian-led Germany may have had different foreign policy priorities, potentially avoiding the tensions that led to the outbreak of World War II.

Furthermore, the earlier unification of Germany under Austrian rule could have altered the course of the First World War. A stronger German Empire, unified earlier, may have been able to prevent Revolutionary France from winning most of the French Revolutionary Wars and could have potentially restored Louis XVI as their puppet king. The absence of the Napoleonic code may have hindered European democracy for at least a century. These changes could have had far-reaching consequences, reshaping the political and social landscape of Europe and potentially averting the conditions that led to the Second World War.

Frequently asked questions