Austrian Economics: Right Or Wrong?

Austrian Economics, pioneered by Carl Menger in the late 19th century, is a school of economic thought that diverges from neoclassical economics in its methodology, analytics, and social philosophy. Unlike neoclassical economics, Austrian Economics does not rely on data and mathematical models but instead focuses on thought experiments to solve complex economic issues. This school of thought emphasizes methodological individualism, methodological subjectivism, and the processes by which market participants gain information and form expectations. Austrian economists believe that economic value is subjective and that individuals act based on their unique value scales. They also reject the neoclassical view of equilibrium, arguing that it is a dynamic process of learning and changing expectations rather than a static end state. While Austrian Economics has made valuable contributions, some critics argue that it has failed to rebuild economics on substantially different foundations from neoclassical economics and that it has overstated its differences with it.

Austrian economics is a human science that does not shy away from public engagement

Austrian economics is characterised by its focus on the individual. It holds that economics is the study of purposeful human action in its broadest sense. Austrian economists emphasise the process by which market participants gain information and form their expectations, rather than assuming that individuals maximise benefits or minimise costs. They argue that one can never know if humans have maximised benefits or minimised costs.

Austrian economists do not use mathematics in their analyses or theories as they believe it cannot capture the complex reality of human action. They argue that as people act, change occurs, and that quantifiable relationships are only applicable when there is no change. Mathematics, in their view, can only capture what has already taken place, not what will take place in the future.

This school of thought also emphasises processes over end states. It recognises that individuals act under conditions of uncertainty and that their actions may be interfered with by the actions of others. Therefore, individuals may not always achieve their desired ends. Austrian economists define efficiency within the process of acting, rather than as a given or known end state of affairs. Efficiency, to them, means the fulfilment of purposes deemed most important to an individual, rather than the fulfilment of less important purposes.

Austrian economics is known for its unique insights into some of the most important economic issues of our time. It has contributed significantly to theories on marginal utility, supply and demand, inflation, money creation, and foreign exchange rates.

However, Austrian economics has also faced criticism. Some argue that it would gain more influence by adopting a more formal, mathematical approach. Critics also claim that Austrian economists have often misunderstood modern neoclassical economics, causing them to overstate their differences. Additionally, it has been suggested that Austrian economics fails to rebuild economics on foundations substantially different from those of modern neoclassical economics.

Despite these criticisms, Austrian economics remains a significant school of thought that challenges conventional wisdom in various fields, including economics, political science, sociology, history, law, business, and philosophy.

Austrian economists believe that one can never know if humans have maximised benefits or minimised costs

Austrian economists do not use mathematics in their analyses or theories because they do not think mathematics can capture the complex reality of human action. They believe that mathematics can capture what has taken place, but can never capture what will take place. Austrian economists emphasise that an individual's actions and choices are based upon a unique value scale known only to that individual. It is this subjective valuation of goods that creates economic value. Austrian economists never attempt to measure or put these values in mathematical form.

The Austrian economist holds all costs and benefits to be subjective and, therefore, not measurable, so only the individual can decide what actions are efficient or inefficient. The notion of an equilibrium state is sometimes seen as the epitome of economic efficiency: supply would equal demand, and therefore, no surplus or shortage of goods would exist. This assumes, however, that market participants know where the equilibrium price is and that moving toward it will not change it. But if the price is already known, why isn't the market already in equilibrium? Furthermore, the movement to equilibrium is a process of learning and of changing expectations, which will change the equilibrium itself.

To the Austrian economist, efficiency is defined within the process of acting, not as a given or known end state of affairs. Efficiency means the fulfillment of the purposes deemed most important to an individual, rather than the fulfillment of less important purposes. The Austrian economist never speaks of efficiency outside of the individual. Austrian economists try to understand the process by which knowledge is generated, spread, and used within the economy. They focus on the institutions that emerge because people lack perfect knowledge and try to cope with this uncertainty.

Austrian economics emphasises processes rather than end states

Austrian economics emphasises processes over end states, viewing the market mechanism as a process and not an outcome of a design. This perspective stems from the belief that people create markets with the intention to improve their lives, rather than through any conscious decision-making. As a result, Austrian economics focuses on the individual choices, incentives, and limited knowledge of people within the market, recognising the complex and ever-changing nature of economic processes.

The Austrian School of Economics, founded by Carl Menger in the late 19th century, is characterised by its commitment to methodological individualism. This concept asserts that social phenomena primarily arise from the motivations, actions, and self-interest of individuals. Consequently, Austrian-school theorists advocate that economic theory should be derived exclusively from the fundamental principles of human action. This approach, known as "praxeology", was organised by Ludwig von Mises in his book "Human Action" published in 1949. Mises argued that praxeology could be used to deduce a priori theoretical economic truths, and that deductive economic thought experiments could yield irrefutable conclusions.

The Austrian School's emphasis on processes is further illustrated by its understanding of economic phenomena. According to Austrian theory, all economic phenomena are caused by the subjective choices of individuals, including factors such as individual knowledge, time, expectation, and other subjective factors. By examining the social ramifications of these individual choices through methodological individualism, Austrian economics offers a unique perspective on economic processes.

Additionally, the Austrian School's view of markets as spontaneous orders further highlights its focus on processes. Spontaneous orders are outcomes that result from purposeful action but not deliberate design. The formation of a path by students crossing a snowy college campus is an example of a spontaneous order, where each student pursued their goal of staying dry without any central planning. This concept is integral to Austrian economics, demonstrating its recognition of the organic and evolving nature of economic processes.

In conclusion, Austrian economics' emphasis on processes rather than end states stems from its commitment to methodological individualism and its understanding of markets as spontaneous orders. By focusing on individual choices and recognising the complex dynamics of economic processes, Austrian economics offers valuable insights into economic phenomena and market mechanisms.

Austrian economists do not use mathematics in their analyses or theories

Austrian economists are distinct from their mainstream counterparts in that they do not use mathematical models and data in their analyses and theories. Instead, they rely on thought experiments and a priori thinking to discover economic laws of universal application. This means that Austrian economists believe that economic truths can be learned by conducting thought experiments that don't rely on data, but rather on logic and reasoning.

The Austrian school of economics, founded by Carl Menger in 1871, is considered heterodox or non-mainstream. While it has contributed significantly to economic thought, particularly in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, it is now seen as less relevant by many modern economists due to its lack of empirical rigor. Austrian economists argue that human behavior cannot be effectively modeled using mathematics and that econometric methods and quantitative analysis are not necessary tools for understanding the economy.

The Austrian school emphasizes methodological individualism, which means that economic phenomena are explained primarily by the motivations, actions, and self-interest of individuals. This is in contrast to other schools of economic thought that focus on aggregate variables, equilibrium analysis, and societal groups rather than individuals. Austrian economists believe that economic analysis should be derived exclusively from basic principles of human action, or praxeology, which is the study of human action. They assume that people act purposefully and make decisions based on their personal preferences, needs, and circumstances.

While Austrian economics may seem attractive because it does not require complex mathematical models, it has been criticized for being too simplistic and not taking into account important factors such as externalities and asymmetric information. Some economists argue that the lack of quantitative rigor in Austrian economics has led to a disconnect from mainstream economic thought and a failure to predict significant economic events such as the 2008 financial crisis.

Despite these criticisms, Austrian economics continues to have a significant influence on economic theory and has contributed to the development of important concepts such as marginal analysis and opportunity cost. However, its rejection of mathematical and statistical methods has likely contributed to its decline in popularity among mainstream economists.

Austrian economics is based on methodological subjectivism

The Austrian school of economics was founded by Carl Menger with his 1871 book 'Principles of Economics'. Menger's work was built upon by his students, Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk and Friedrich von Wieser, who made significant contributions of their own. This early Austrian school was one of three founding currents of the marginalist revolution of the 1870s, introducing the subjectivist approach to economics.

Menger explained in his book that the economic values of goods and services are subjective in nature, so what is valuable to one person may not be valuable to another. He further argued that as the number of goods increases, their subjective value to an individual decreases. This idea is known as the theory of diminishing marginal utility, to which Menger made significant contributions.

Later, Ludwig von Mises, another prominent thinker of the Austrian school, applied the theory of marginal utility to money in his 1912 book, 'The Theory of Money and Credit'. According to Mises, the theory of diminishing marginal utility of money can help answer one of the most fundamental questions in economics: How much money is too much? Again, the answer is subjective. An extra dollar in the hands of a billionaire would make little difference, while the same dollar would be invaluable to a poor person.

The Austrian school uses a priori thinking to discover economic laws of universal application, in contrast to other mainstream schools of economics, which rely on data and mathematical models. Austrians believe that economic theory should be derived exclusively from basic principles of human action. They emphasise the process by which market participants gain information and form expectations, rather than assuming maximising behaviour as neoclassical economists do. Austrians argue that one can never know if humans have maximised benefits or minimised costs.

Austrian economics stands out from other schools of economic thought due to its focus on individuals rather than aggregate variables, equilibrium analysis, and societal groups. Austrians seek to understand the economy through methodological individualism, examining the social ramifications of individual choices. They believe that subjective choices, including individual knowledge, time, expectation, and other factors, cause all economic phenomena.

Frequently asked questions