Countryside Living: Australians Choosing Rural Life

how many people live countryside in australia

Australia is one of the most urbanised countries in the world, with over two-thirds of its population living in major cities. In 2024, Australia's population was 27.2 million, with around 7 million (or 28%) living in rural and remote areas. These areas encompass diverse communities and present unique challenges due to their geographic location, including limited access to services and poorer health outcomes. While the Indigenous population is concentrated in remote areas, comprising 49% of the population in very remote regions, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are more commonly found in urban and regional areas.

Characteristics Values
Total population of Australia 27.2 million (as of June 2024)
Population living in the countryside/rural areas 7 million (28%) (as of 2023) or 3.5 million (as of 2020)
Population living in major cities 18.9 million (69%) (as of 2009) or 20 million (73%) (as of 2021)
Population living in inner regional areas 4.3 million (20%) (as of 2009) or 5.3 million (25%) (as of 2021)
Population living in outer regional areas 2.1 million (9%) (as of 2009) or 2.8 million (10%) (as of 2021)
Population living in remote areas 324,000 (1.5%) (as of 2009) or 460,000 (1.9%) (as of 2021)
Population living in very remote areas 174,000 (0.8%) (as of 2009) or 220,000 (1.9%) (as of 2021)
Indigenous population 460,000 (1.9%) (as of 2021) or 320,000 (3.8%) (as of 2023)
Indigenous population in major cities 1%
Indigenous population in inner regional areas 3%
Indigenous population in outer regional areas 6%
Indigenous population in remote areas 15%
Indigenous population in very remote areas 49%

shunculture

In 2023, 31% of Australians were born overseas

Australia is one of the most urbanised countries in the world, with over two-thirds (69%) of its population living in major cities. The capital cities grew by 427,800 people (2.4%) in 2023-24, with Melbourne experiencing the largest increase (142,600) and Perth the highest growth rate (3.1%).

While it is difficult to define the exact boundaries between city and countryside, it is clear that a significant majority of Australians live in urban areas. In 2009, 69% of Australians lived in major cities, 20% in inner regional areas, 9% in outer regional areas, and 2.3% in remote or very remote areas. The Indigenous population is more concentrated in remote areas, comprising 1% of the population in major cities and 49% in very remote areas.

The high proportion of foreign-born residents in Australia is not unique among developed nations. For example, 88.1% of those living in the United Arab Emirates were born outside the country, and 72.8% of Kuwait's population are foreign-born. Australia's overseas-born population has grown at a faster rate than its Australian-born population since post-World War II migration began.

shunculture

Indigenous Australians are more likely to live in rural areas

Australia is one of the most urbanised countries in the world, with over two-thirds (69%) of its population living in major cities. However, Indigenous Australians are more likely to live in rural areas.

In 2009, 2.3% of Australians lived in remote or very remote areas. While Australians of all backgrounds can be found across the country, the Indigenous population is much more concentrated in these remote areas. Although Indigenous people make up only 2.4% of Australia's total population, they comprise 15% of the population in remote areas and 49% in very remote areas.

There are several reasons why Indigenous Australians are more likely to live in rural areas. One factor is family structure. Indigenous people are more likely to live in one-parent families, especially in remote and very remote regions. In these remote areas, 35% of Indigenous people live in one-parent families compared to 9% of non-Indigenous people. Additionally, Indigenous people in remote and very remote areas are less likely to be childless couples than their non-Indigenous counterparts.

Another reason for the higher proportion of Indigenous people in rural areas is the availability of services. Geographic remoteness limits access to services such as doctors, employment services, and telecommunications. The lower old-age dependency ratios in remote and very remote regions reflect the higher proportion of Indigenous people, who may face challenges accessing services due to transport/distance, cost, or inadequate local offerings.

Furthermore, employment opportunities may also play a role. Many younger people, including Indigenous Australians, move to remote areas for work, particularly in industries like mining.

shunculture

28% of Australians live in rural areas

Australia is one of the most urbanised countries in the world, with over two-thirds (69%) of its population living in major cities. This equates to around 15.1 million people. Despite this, 28% of Australians, or around 7 million people, live in rural and remote areas. This includes inner regional areas (20%), outer regional areas (9%), and remote or very remote areas (2.3%).

The Indigenous population has a much greater concentration in more remote areas. While Indigenous people make up 2.4% of Australia's population, they comprise 1% of the population in major cities, 3% in inner regional areas, 6% in outer regional areas, 15% in remote areas, and 49% in very remote areas.

There are several notable differences between those living in rural areas and those in major cities. Firstly, geographic area has an impact on how children spend their time, with those in rural areas spending more time outdoors. However, children's participation in extracurricular activities is higher in major cities, and they tend to have better physical development and learning outcomes.

Another difference is the age of the population. While the population of Australia is ageing, with an increasing proportion of people aged 65 years and over, the average age tends to be lower in remote and very remote areas. In 2022, 15.5% of people in major cities were aged 65 or older, compared to 14.7% in remote areas and 10.3% in very remote areas. The highest proportion of older Australians is found in inner and outer regional areas, where people tend to move upon retirement.

Australians living in rural and remote areas face unique challenges due to their geographic location. They often have poorer health outcomes and poorer access to primary healthcare services than those in major cities. For example, they have higher rates of hospitalisations, deaths, and injuries.

shunculture

The population of Australia is ageing

Australia's population is ageing due to increasing life expectancy and declining fertility rates. In 1970, people aged 65 and over made up 8.3% of the population, and by 2020, this had risen to 16%. By 2026, it is projected that over 22% of Australians will be aged over 65. The number of people aged 85 and over has also increased, from 0.5% in 1970 to 2.1% in 2020. This ageing population will have a significant impact on Australian society, reshaping workplaces, communities, and finances.

The ageing population is a result of sustained low fertility and increasing life expectancy. In 2020, the number of children in Australia decreased compared to the previous year, and the proportion of children in the total population has decreased over the last 20 years. In contrast, the population of people aged 65 and over grew in all states and territories in the year ending June 2020, with the largest proportional increase in the Northern Territory.

The ageing of the population will have a significant impact on the structure of communities and the types of services needed. There may be a shift from building schools and playgrounds to constructing health centres and senior gyms. The ageing population will also impact the workforce, with a potential increase in the number of care workers needed. Australia is already facing a shortage of care workers, and by 2050, it is projected that an additional 285,800 workers will be required for aged care, disability, and mental health support.

The financial implications of an ageing population are also significant. The cost of aged care is already a concern for the government, and it is a priority in discussions about sector reform. Australia's health spending on the rising number of older Australians is projected to more than double to AUD$270 billion (USD$174 billion).

While the majority of Australians (69%) live in major cities, a significant proportion (20%) live in inner regional areas, and 9% in outer regional areas. The population in these regional areas tends to be older, with higher old-age dependency ratios, as many Australians choose to leave major cities upon retirement. Indigenous people are more likely to live in remote or very remote areas, comprising 49% of the population in these regions.

Venus: Shipping to Australia?

You may want to see also

shunculture

Australians living in rural areas have poorer health outcomes

Australia is one of the most urbanised countries in the world, with over two-thirds (69%) of its population living in major cities. The remaining population is distributed across inner regional areas (20%), outer regional areas (9%), and remote or very remote areas (2.3%). This translates to around 7 million people living in rural and remote areas.

There are several factors contributing to the poorer health outcomes in rural areas. One key factor is the challenge of accessing healthcare services and professionals, including specialists. Rural residents may need to travel long distances or relocate to receive specialised treatment. Small rural towns have the lowest number of health professionals relative to their population size.

Another factor is social determinants such as income, education, and employment opportunities. Rural areas generally have lower educational aspirations and limited access to services. This can lead to a level of disadvantage that impacts health outcomes. Additionally, geographic isolation can result in higher rates of occupational and physical risk, such as those associated with farming, mining, or transport-related accidents.

The health disparities between rural and metropolitan areas in Australia are significant, and addressing these challenges is crucial to improving the well-being of rural residents. Initiatives to improve access to healthcare services and address social determinants of health can help reduce the health gap between rural and urban communities.

Frequently asked questions

Around 28% of Australians live in rural and remote areas.

In 2020, the rural population of Australia was 3,529,080.

Australia is one of the most urbanised countries in the world, with around 69% of the population living in major cities.

No. People living in rural and remote areas have poorer access to healthcare services than those in cities. They also have poorer health outcomes, with higher rates of hospitalisations, deaths and injuries.

Yes, there are differences in children's developmental outcomes across geographic areas. Children in major cities have better physical development and learning outcomes than those in other areas. However, children in rural areas spend more time outdoors.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment