The Us Military's Extensive Drone Presence In Afghanistan

The number of drones the US has in Afghanistan is unclear, but the country has been conducting drone strikes in the country since 2001. Drone warfare has been a key part of the US military's strategy in Afghanistan, with unmanned flights dominating the air campaign. The CIA and US military have had broad authority to kill suspected terrorists in Afghanistan, but the Biden administration is reviewing whether to raise the bar for the CIA and Pentagon to carry out deadly drone strikes. The US drone program has faced criticism for its lack of transparency, accountability, and oversight, as well as its impact on civilian casualties.

The US drone strike that killed al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri

The use of drones has become a primary weapon of the US military, with drones being used for lethal counterterrorism strikes, surveillance, and other non-lethal operations. The US has conducted drone strikes in Afghanistan since 2001, with the number of strikes multiplying under the Trump administration.

On July 31, 2022, the US killed al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in a drone strike in Kabul, Afghanistan. Al-Zawahiri was sheltering in downtown Kabul, and was killed by a drone strike at 9:48 p.m. ET, which was authorized by President Joe Biden. The strike was a "precise tailored airstrike" using two Hellfire missiles, and no American personnel or civilians were harmed.

Al-Zawahiri was a key plotter of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and took over as the leader of Al-Qaeda after Osama bin Laden's death. His death was the biggest blow to the group since bin Laden's death in 2011. Al-Zawahiri was an Egyptian surgeon with a $25 million bounty on his head, and he helped coordinate the September 11 attacks, which killed nearly 3,000 people.

The strike against al-Zawahiri was a major victory for the Biden administration and demonstrated the US's ability to conduct effective counterterrorism operations in Afghanistan without a large military presence. However, al-Zawahiri's presence in Afghanistan raised questions about the Taliban's commitment to preventing the country from becoming a terrorist safe haven.

The use of drones allows the US military to conduct lethal strikes and surveillance operations while keeping personnel out of harm's way. Drones have become an integral part of US counterterrorism strategy and will likely continue to play a significant role in future operations.

The CIA's drone program

The CIA's use of drones has been a key component of the US counterterrorism strategy, both inside and outside of traditional battlefields. The drones are used for surveillance and targeted killings of suspected terrorists. The program was expanded under the Trump administration, reversing the efforts of the Obama administration to curb CIA drone usage and transfer authority to the Department of Defense.

The morality of death by remote control

The use of drones in warfare has raised a number of ethical questions, with many people questioning the morality of death by remote control.

Drones have become one of the primary weapons of the US military, with their use rapidly increasing since the 9/11 attacks. They are used to carry out lethal counterterrorism strikes, surveillance, and other non-lethal operations. The CIA's drone program remains largely secret, but it is known that drones have been used to conduct targeted killings of individuals suspected of terrorism, both inside and outside of battlefields.

The use of drones has been criticised for fuelling anti-American sentiment and aiding in the recruitment of armed groups that engage in terrorism. There are also concerns about the impact of drone strikes on the small tribal communities of the Pukhtun, Somali, and Yemeni, making it difficult to implement long-term peace initiatives in these volatile regions. In addition, there have been numerous reports of innocent civilians being killed in drone strikes, including women and children.

The use of drones also raises questions about the impact on the individuals operating them. Drone pilots have been found to experience mental health problems, including anxiety, depression, severe stress, and moral injury, at similar rates to pilots participating in live combat. The decision to use weapons that can kill from a distance is a weighty matter, and the physical removal of the operator from the battlefield raises questions about the concepts of bravery and courage in warfare.

The increased use of drones by the US military has also been criticised for creating a dangerous precedent for other countries and non-state groups. Over three dozen countries have acquired armed drones, and the lack of oversight, transparency, and accountability of the US drone program may serve as a harmful model for others.

While drones can provide benefits such as increased flexibility and reduced risk for military personnel, the morality of death by remote control is a complex and highly debated issue. The use of drones in warfare has raised a number of ethical concerns, and it is important to carefully consider the potential consequences of their use.

The legality of drone attacks

The US has relied on the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) to justify its use of drones in Afghanistan and beyond. The AUMF gives the US president the power to “use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organisations, or persons” deemed to be behind attacks on the US. However, critics argue that the AUMF is overly broad and has been used to justify strikes against groups that did not exist at the time of the 9/11 attacks.

The Obama administration claimed that the AUMF gave them the power to use drones against al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and "associated forces", despite this term not appearing in the Act. They argued that "associated forces" referred to entities closely linked to al-Qaeda, such as its Yemeni franchise or fighters in East Africa. The Obama administration also invoked the AUMF to legally justify targeting Islamic State (IS) fighters in Iraq, Syria, and Libya without further authorisation from Congress.

The legality of drone strikes is further complicated by the involvement of the CIA. While the US Department of Defense is generally required to comply with the law of armed conflict (LOAC) in all military operations, it is unclear if the CIA follows the same rules. The CIA's mission includes violations of foreign or international law when authorised by the president, and it is not trained in the requirements and doctrine of the LOAC.

The use of drones for targeted killings has also raised legal and ethical concerns. While the US argues that it is entitled to use drones to defend itself against terrorist groups, critics argue that this amounts to a perpetual global war. Additionally, there are concerns about civilian casualties caused by drone strikes, with human rights groups and civil liberties advocates arguing that the strikes are illegal and cause excessive civilian deaths.

To address these concerns, the Obama administration issued the Presidential Policy Guidance (PPG) in 2013, which sets more restrictive standards for drone strikes than what is required by the LOAC. The PPG prohibits strikes even when they would be legal under the LOAC and requires near certainty that no civilians will be killed or injured. However, the applicability and operation of the PPG have been the subject of much confusion and criticism.

Overall, the legality of drone attacks remains a highly contested issue, with critics arguing that the US government's legal justification for the strikes is insufficient and that the use of drones violates international humanitarian law and human rights law.

The future of drones and warfare

Increased Use of Drones

Drones have already become one of the primary weapons of the US military, and their use is expected to grow in the coming years. Hundreds of companies are developing small and large-scale drone technology, and both state and non-state actors are seeking to integrate drones into their military programs. As drone capabilities continue to evolve, they will likely play an even more significant role in warfare.

Improved Technology

The capabilities of drones are constantly advancing. For example, drones with autonomous capabilities and AI-enabled munitions are already being used in conflicts like the Russia-Ukraine War. Artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to play a bigger role in drone warfare, with the development of "killer algorithms" that can select targets based on certain characteristics. The US military's Replicator initiative aims to deploy thousands of autonomous weapons systems across multiple domains in the next 18 to 24 months.

Ethical and Legal Concerns

The increased use of drones in warfare raises ethical and legal concerns. There are worries about the potential for "warbot" armies and the risk of violating international humanitarian law and human rights law. The use of AI in drones also raises questions about accountability, especially when mistakes are made or civilians are harmed. Some states and organizations have proposed banning weapons systems that lack meaningful human control or are too complex to understand or explain.

Impact on Tactics and Strategies

Drones have already revolutionized warfare by providing real-time information, improving reconnaissance and surveillance capabilities, and increasing flexibility in military operations. They will likely continue to shape tactics and strategies, with the development of drone swarms and the integration of AI enabling more coordinated and targeted attacks.

Broader Adoption

The effectiveness and affordability of drones have led to their adoption by various state and non-state actors. Ukraine's successful use of drones in its conflict with Russia has particularly highlighted the potential of this technology, with other countries showing interest in learning from their experience. This could lead to a proliferation of drone technology and a shift in the tactics employed by militaries worldwide.

Limitations and Challenges

While drones offer significant advantages, they also have limitations and face challenges. Drones require significant technological expertise to operate effectively, especially in contested environments with electronic countermeasures. Additionally, the proliferation of drone technology raises concerns about counter-drone measures and the potential for adversaries to target the networks of human operators.

In conclusion, drones are expected to play an increasingly significant role in warfare, with advancements in technology and growing adoption by various actors. However, the ethical, legal, and strategic implications of this trend are complex and will require careful consideration by policymakers and military leaders.

Frequently asked questions