The Elusive Freedom: Afghanistan's Complex Relationship With Free Speech

Afghanistan has had a tumultuous history with freedom of speech. While the country has seen a proliferation of media outlets in the private sector, journalists continue to face significant barriers and risks in their work. Under the Taliban regime, the media has faced severe restrictions and intimidation, with journalists being arbitrarily detained, beaten, and even killed for their reporting. Self-censorship and a lack of journalistic standards have plagued the country's free media development, and the Taliban's broad and vague regulations effectively prohibit any critical reporting about them. Despite claims by Taliban officials that they believe in freedom of speech, their actions indicate a fierce determination to snuff out dissent and impose control over society. Social media has become a refuge for Afghans to express their concerns and connect with each other, but even this space is not immune to Taliban influence and monitoring. The future of free speech and the press in Afghanistan remains uncertain and highly dependent on the actions of the Taliban government and the international community's response.

The Taliban's restrictions on media and free speech

Since the Taliban's return to power in Afghanistan, they have imposed wide-ranging restrictions on media and free speech, stifling criticism and dissent. The Taliban's regulations are so broad and vague that they prohibit virtually any critical reporting about the Taliban. The rules require media outlets to "prepare detailed reports" with the new governmental regulatory body before publication.

The regulations state that media are prohibited from printing or broadcasting reports that "are contrary to Islam," "insult national figures," or "distort news content." Journalists are required to "ensure that their reporting is balanced" and not report on "matters that have not been confirmed by officials" or issues that "could have a negative impact on the public's attitude."

The Taliban's intelligence office has summoned journalists and warned them that their reporting constituted "propaganda". The Taliban have also arbitrarily detained and beaten journalists. Many Afghan journalists have fled the country or gone into hiding, and numerous media outlets have closed.

The Taliban's restrictions have serious consequences for the Afghan people, who are now deprived of independent and objective media sources. The flow of information has been severely limited, and the few media outlets still operating in the country are under intense pressure from the Taliban.

The international community must send a clear message that the Taliban's treatment of the media will remain a core concern in future relations.

The dangers of publicly criticising the Taliban

The Taliban's return to power in Afghanistan in 2021 has been marked by a crackdown on women's rights, neglect of basic services, and a regression to the harsh interpretation of Islamic law that characterised their previous rule. While the Taliban has professed a belief in freedom of speech, in practice, they have been silencing critics and stifling dissent. This article will explore the dangers of publicly criticising the Taliban, including intimidation, violence, detention, and execution.

Intimidation and Violence

The Taliban has a history of intimidating and violently attacking critics and journalists. In the past, this has included bombing media outlets and assassinating journalists. Since their return to power, journalists have been arbitrarily detained, beaten, and threatened with violence for reporting on protests or producing content critical of the Taliban. In one instance, a photojournalist was detained while covering a protest and held in custody without access to his family. In another case, a civil society activist was hauled away by the Taliban and later found dead, floating in a river.

Detention

The Taliban has also been detaining critics and subjecting them to brutal beatings. In one instance, 19 Afghan journalists were detained and faced brutal beatings. Local and foreign reporters have had their camera equipment confiscated and have been denied permission to film protests. Those who refuse to comply with the Taliban's restrictions have been detained and subjected to violence.

Execution

In addition to intimidation, violence, and detention, the Taliban has also been known to execute critics. In one case, a civil society activist who posted modestly critical messages about the Taliban on social media was hauled away and later found dead, floating in a river. His body showed signs of torture, and his family mourned him as a "martyr of free speech". This case illustrates the deadly consequences that can result from publicly criticising the Taliban.

The Taliban's suppression of free speech and dissent has had a chilling effect on Afghan society. Journalists, activists, and ordinary citizens who dare to speak out against the Taliban face intimidation, violence, detention, and even the risk of execution. The Taliban's harsh tactics have effectively silenced many critics and created an atmosphere of fear and self-censorship. As a result, the Afghan people have been deprived of their fundamental right to freedom of expression and the free flow of information has been severely restricted.

The role of social media in voicing dissent

Social media has played a critical role in influencing change in Afghanistan. In a country that has been ravaged by war and civil strife, the digital revolution has been a relatively recent phenomenon. After the fall of the Taliban in 2001, broad access to digital telecommunication services became a reality in Afghanistan, bringing about substantial social changes.

A tool for the Taliban

The Taliban has been quick to recognize the power of social media as a tool for spreading propaganda and controlling the narrative. In the past, the Taliban had banned the internet and television, but now, they use it to threaten and cajole the Afghan people, in a sign of how they might use technology to build power. They have turned to social media to tame opposition and broadcast messages of peace and stability that stand in stark contrast to the scenes of violence and chaos broadcast around the world.

The Taliban has a significant presence on Twitter, with multiple spokesmen having unverified accounts with over 300,000 followers each. They have also embraced other platforms such as Facebook, WhatsApp, and Telegram to spread their messages. Their online presence allows them to cultivate a sanitized and rehabilitated image, concealing the brutality they are known for.

A voice for dissent

For ordinary Afghans, social media has become the primary means to voice their concerns and participate in political activities. As peaceful public protests remain dangerous, many have turned to social media to express their views freely. In a country with deep-rooted gender inequalities, the potential anonymity of the internet offers great opportunities for women to express their opinions and connect with others.

Social media campaigns have been used to address a range of issues, from demanding protections for freedom of speech, gender equality, and democracy to protesting the arrest of activists and advocating for women's rights in peace talks. These campaigns have had some success in influencing government decisions and raising awareness among the international community.

A double-edged sword

While social media has empowered Afghans to speak out, it has also given the Taliban a platform to spread disinformation and control the narrative. The Taliban has been able to operate largely unhindered on Twitter, and their sophisticated social media strategy has contributed to the suffering of Afghans by sowing disinformation that is repeated without question by global media outlets.

The future of free speech and the press in Afghanistan remains uncertain. With the Taliban firmly in control of the country, there are fears that they will become more aggressive in curbing access to social media and the internet. The real test of the Taliban's approach to the internet will be what they allow the Afghan people to say, not just what they say themselves.

The intimidation and violence faced by journalists

The Taliban's media regulations, distributed during a meeting with journalists in Kabul, are broad and vague, prohibiting any critical reporting about the group. Journalists are required to ensure "balanced" reporting and avoid issues that could negatively impact public sentiment. These rules have led to widespread self-censorship, with journalists fearing imprisonment if they cross the line.

The intimidation and violence against journalists have been persistent. Taliban commanders and fighters have engaged in a pattern of threats, intimidation, and violence against media professionals. Journalists have been detained, beaten, and even killed for their work. In one instance, freelance photojournalist Murtaza Samadi was detained while covering a protest in Herat. He was held in custody without access to his family and was eventually released after a month.

The situation is dire for female journalists in Afghanistan. During the Taliban's rule, women were denied basic freedoms, and female journalists were forced out of their positions. In 2021, three female Afghan journalists were killed, and in the same year, the manager of Paktia Ghag radio station, Toofan Omar, was killed for voicing support for an independent press. The killing of journalists has continued, with around 30 journalists killed in a year, according to official accounts.

The intimidation and violence have forced many journalists to flee the country or go into hiding. The Taliban's actions have effectively stifled critical reporting and dissent, creating an atmosphere of fear and self-censorship. The future of free speech and a free press in Afghanistan appears bleak unless there is a significant shift in the Taliban's approach to media freedom and the safety of journalists.

The future of free speech and a free press in Afghanistan

Under the Taliban's rule, journalists have faced arbitrary detention, beatings, and intimidation. The group has imposed broad and vague media regulations that prohibit any critical reporting and are so restrictive that journalists are engaging in self-censorship to avoid punishment. The regulations ban reporting that is "contrary to Islam," "insults national figures," or could have a "negative impact on the public's attitude." This has effectively stifled dissent and made it dangerous for journalists to do their jobs.

The situation has led to an exodus of journalists from the country, with many going into hiding or closing their media outlets. Those who remain practice self-censorship or face the consequences of the Taliban's harsh restrictions. This has effectively silenced critics and limited the free flow of information, which is a key component of a healthy democracy.

However, there are some reasons for hope. Social media has provided a platform for Afghans to express their views and connect with each other, even if they cannot do so publicly. Foreign journalists, such as Italian reporter Cecilia Sala, have also played a crucial role in reporting on the situation in Afghanistan and bringing attention to the abuses taking place.

The international community has a responsibility to stand up for free speech and a free press in Afghanistan. Foreign governments should make it clear that the Taliban's treatment of the media will remain a core concern in future relations. By applying pressure and shining a light on abuses, there is a chance to preserve some level of free speech and a free press in the country, even under the Taliban's rule.

Frequently asked questions