The Economics Of Us Presence In Afghanistan: A Complex Web Of Interests And Investments

The US has spent trillions of dollars on the war in Afghanistan, with some estimates placing the figure at $2.26 trillion. This money has been spent on a variety of expenses, including war-fighting costs, training and equipping Afghan military and police forces, reconstruction projects, and humanitarian aid. While there have been some improvements in Afghanistan as a result of this spending, such as increased life expectancy and improved education opportunities, the country remains unstable and the Taliban controls much of the country. In addition, the war has been profitable for many private military contractors and defence companies, who have benefited from lucrative contracts and increased stock prices. The massive influx of American money has also contributed to a system of mass corruption in Afghanistan, with much of the contract money ending up in the hands of the Taliban, criminal networks, or corrupt officials.

Private military contractors profited immensely from the war in Afghanistan

The US military relied heavily on private contractors for support in almost all areas of war operations. They supplied trucks, planes, fuel, helicopters, ships, drones, weapons, and munitions, as well as support services like catering, construction, IT, and logistics. The number of contractors on the ground outnumbered US troops during most of the conflict. By the summer of 2020, the US had 22,562 contractor personnel in Afghanistan, roughly twice the number of American troops.

The defense industry benefited from the way the war was budgeted and paid for. Congress used "`emergency' and 'contingency' funding" that circumvented the normal budget process, enabling everyone to maintain the pretense that the war would be over soon. This created a "culture of endless money" inside the Pentagon, as described by former defense secretary Robert Gates. The Pentagon made operational decisions, managed the bidding process for contractors, and awarded the contracts, keeping at least 10% of the wartime funding in classified accounts.

The defense industry's stocks outperformed the stock market overall by nearly 60% during the Afghanistan war. The conflict was highly lucrative for major defense contractors like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, Northrop Grumman, and General Dynamics. These companies acquired smaller manufacturers, and thousands of subcontractors around the world earned money from selling equipment to the war effort. Global oil companies were also key beneficiaries, as the Pentagon is the world's largest purchaser of fuel.

The involvement of private contractors in the war in Afghanistan increased the cost of war operations. The large-scale private sector involvement resulted in waste, profiteering, corruption, and "ghost spending" (money spent on activities that did not exist). According to a Pentagon analysis, 40% of the $108 billion paid to contractors in Afghanistan between 2010 and 2012 ended up in the hands of the Taliban, criminal networks, or corrupt Afghan officials.

The use of private contractors had a significant impact on the conflict. Military analysts pointed to the departure of US government contractors as a turning point in the Afghan military's collapse. The Afghans relied on contractors for training, gear maintenance, intelligence gathering, and close air support in their battles against the Taliban. With the withdrawal of contractors, the Afghan military quickly lost its advantage and was unable to counter the Taliban's growing strength.

The US spent trillions on the war, with a large chunk going to defence contractors

The US has spent trillions on the war in Afghanistan, with a significant portion of that money going to defence contractors.

Since 2001, the US has spent $2.26 trillion in Afghanistan, with the largest chunk of that money, nearly $1 trillion, going to the Overseas Contingency Operations budget for the Department of Defence. The second-largest expense was interest payments on the money borrowed to fund the war, totalling $530 billion.

The war effort in Afghanistan was largely privatised, with the US military relying on private security contractors to handle the logistics of the war. In fact, in the CENTCOM region, there were 43,800 contractors compared to 15,000 military personnel in October 2020. In Afghanistan, the ratio of contractors to military personnel increased from 1:1 in 2010-2011 to 3:1 at the end.

In the months leading up to the US withdrawal from Afghanistan, major defence companies were awarded contracts worth hundreds of millions of dollars. The Department of Defence issued nearly $1 billion in contracts to 17 companies for work in Afghanistan that was to continue past the withdrawal date.

For example, defence contractor and construction firm Fluor received contracts worth at least $85 million for work in Afghanistan. Defence contractor Leidos was awarded a $34 million contract to provide logistics support services for the Afghan Air Force and the Special Mission Wing. The US Army Contracting Command also awarded Leidos an initial $727.89 million contract in 2017.

Other notable contracts include a $24.9 million deal with Salient Federal Services for information technology infrastructure in Afghanistan, and a $9.7 million contract with Textron for force-protection efforts in Afghanistan.

Maryland-based defence support services conglomerate Amentum Services was awarded more than $305 million in defence contracts mentioning Afghanistan since 2008. The Department of Defence also awarded DynCorp International, which was subsumed by Amentum in 2020, more than $4 billion in defence contracts mentioning Afghanistan since 2008.

The use of private contractors in Afghanistan was a turning point in the Afghan military's collapse. Contractors provided key maintenance and military support, including training, gear maintenance, intelligence gathering, and close air support in battles against the Taliban. With the departure of these contractors, the Afghan military quickly collapsed as they were unable to maintain their equipment and systems.

While there were some negative incidents involving defence contractors, such as financial malfeasance and human rights abuses, their presence was crucial to the US war effort in Afghanistan. They provided flexible personnel systems and filled gaps that could not be met by military service members alone.

Overall, the US spent trillions on the war in Afghanistan, with a large portion of that money going to defence contractors who played a significant role in the conflict.

The US borrowed heavily to fund the war, with huge interest payments

The US government borrowed heavily to fund the war in Afghanistan, marking a shift from how previous wars were financed. From the Civil War through the Korean War, the US government primarily paid for conflicts through taxes and war bonds. However, in the post-9/11 era, military spending has been financed almost entirely through borrowing. This has contributed to a "culture of endless money" within the Pentagon, as described by former Defense Secretary Robert Gates.

The US government's heavy borrowing to fund the war in Afghanistan has resulted in significant interest payments. According to the Costs of War Project at Brown University, the estimated interest payments on the borrowed funds amount to $530 billion. This is the second-biggest line item in the US's spending on the war in Afghanistan. Overall, the US has spent approximately $2 trillion on the war, with some figures placing it at $2.26 trillion or even $2.313 trillion.

The decision to borrow money to fund the war has had broader macroeconomic effects, including raising consumer interest rates and increasing the national debt. The interest payments on the borrowed funds will continue to accrue, with projections that Americans could owe $6.5 trillion in interest for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq combined by 2050. This means that the true cost of the war will be borne by future generations, as the interest payments will continue long after the conflict has ended.

The war in Afghanistan was also notable for the extensive involvement of private military contractors, who profited immensely. The reliance on private contractors contributed to the high cost of the war and created opportunities for waste, fraud, and abuse. The privatization of the war effort allowed a multitude of parties, including military contractors, oil companies, and others, to benefit financially from the conflict.

The US spent billions on counternarcotics efforts, but opium exports reached record heights

The US has spent billions of dollars on counternarcotics efforts in Afghanistan, but opium exports have reached record heights. Between 2002 and 2017, the US government spent roughly $8.62 billion on counternarcotics efforts in Afghanistan. Despite this investment, Afghanistan remains the world's largest producer of opium, and opium poppy is the country's largest cash crop. Opium production accounts for about 80% of global illicit opium production.

The US has tried various strategies to combat opium production in Afghanistan, including eradication efforts, alternative development programs, interdiction operations, and law enforcement. However, these efforts have largely been unsuccessful and, in some cases, have made the problem worse. For example, eradication efforts targeted only a small fraction of opium fields and often displaced poppy cultivation to other areas. Alternative development programs that promoted alternative crops, such as wheat, were often too short-term and failed to provide sustainable alternatives to poppy cultivation. Interdiction operations declined as US forces withdrew from Afghanistan, and law enforcement efforts were hindered by corruption and a lack of support from the Afghan government.

The failure of counternarcotics efforts in Afghanistan can be attributed to several factors, including a lack of coordination among US agencies, poor strategy and implementation, insecurity, lack of economic opportunities for farmers, and limited government presence in opium-producing regions. Additionally, counternarcotics goals were often not given sufficient priority by US and Afghan government officials, and there was a lack of consensus on the best approach to addressing the issue.

The consequences of the failure to curb opium production in Afghanistan are significant. Opium production has tightened its stranglehold on the Afghan economy, corrupted sectors of the Afghan government, and provided a rising source of revenue for the Taliban. It has also contributed to drug addiction and health issues within Afghanistan and in consumer countries.

The US spent billions on reconstruction projects, but much of it was lost to corruption

The United States has spent billions of dollars on reconstruction projects in Afghanistan, but much of this money was lost to corruption and failed projects. Since 2001, the US has spent trillions in Afghanistan, with the biggest chunk going to the Department of Defense's Overseas Contingency Operations budget. While the exact breakdown of costs is unclear, it is estimated that the US spent around $87 billion to train Afghan military and police forces, $24 billion on economic development, and $30 billion on other reconstruction programs.

The Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) has documented massive waste in US reconstruction spending, with about $2.4 billion worth of assets being unused, abandoned, deteriorated, or destroyed. Only about $1.2 billion out of the $7.8 billion in US-funded assets were being used as intended, and only a fraction of that was maintained in good condition. This waste has been attributed to several factors, including poor planning, lack of coordination, and corruption.

US agencies have been criticized for pouring too much money too quickly into Afghanistan, overwhelming the country's capacity to absorb it effectively. In their rush to spend, US agencies often failed to properly assess the needs and capabilities of the Afghan government and people, resulting in projects that were unnecessary or impractical. For example, the US built schools that went unused as local Afghans preferred their children to herd goats, and a police headquarters with a glass facade and atrium that the local police chief could not even open.

The US also failed to adequately monitor and evaluate its reconstruction efforts, leading to good money being thrown after bad. Weapons provided to Afghan forces were vulnerable to theft or misuse due to inadequate staffing and record-keeping, posing a significant danger to US and coalition forces. In addition, US contractors involved in Afghanistan reconstruction projects have been accused of making illegal "protection payments" to the Taliban, funding the very insurgency that US troops were fighting against.

Overall, the US reconstruction effort in Afghanistan has been characterized by waste, fraud, and abuse, with limited success in achieving its stated goals. While there have been some improvements in health, education, and economic growth, Afghanistan remains a country plagued by poverty, corruption, and instability.

Frequently asked questions