The Complexities Of Extradition: Afghanistan And The United States

Afghanistan does not have an extradition treaty with the United States. Extradition treaties are formal agreements between countries to surrender individuals who are wanted for criminal prosecution or sentencing in the requesting country. The United States has extradition treaties with over a hundred nations, but there are many countries with which it has no such treaty.

The United States does not have extradition treaties with several countries, including Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Benin, Bhutan, Botswana, Brunei, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Cuba, Cyprus, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Djibouti, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Indonesia, Iran, Ivory Coast, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Lebanon, Libya, Madagascar, Maldives, Mali, Mauritania, Moldova, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Nepal, Niger, North Korea, Oman, Palestine, People’s Republic of China, Qatar, Republic of Macedonia, Russia, Rwanda, Saint Martin, Saint Pierre and Miquelon, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Siachen Glacier, Solomon Islands, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, São Tomé and Príncipe, Taiwan, Tajikistan, Togo, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Vatican City, Vietnam, Western Sahara, and Yemen.

The absence of an extradition treaty between two countries does not necessarily prevent extradition. The United States may still seek extradition on a case-by-case basis, and some countries may grant extradition without a treaty. However, the lack of a treaty can complicate the extradition process and strain diplomatic relations.

The US has extradition treaties with over 100 countries

Extradition treaties are agreements between countries to surrender individuals who are wanted for criminal prosecution or sentencing in the requesting country. The US has signed such treaties with many countries, but there are also a significant number of countries that do not have extradition treaties with the US. This makes it difficult to extradite criminals or suspects who flee to these countries.

The US does not have an extradition treaty with Afghanistan, and Afghanistan is therefore considered a non-extradition country. Other non-extradition countries include Cuba, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen.

Non-extradition countries are nations that do not engage in the practice of extraditing their own citizens to other countries. They may have enacted laws that ban the extradition of their nationals, or they may not have established extradition treaties with other nations. This setup allows individuals who have committed a crime in one country to elude justice by taking refuge in another non-extradition country.

The reasons for not having extradition treaties vary but can include political tensions, human rights concerns, or differences in legal systems. Some countries may refuse to extradite as a matter of foreign policy, believing that a foreign government should not be able to prosecute their citizens. Other nations may take a pragmatic approach, believing that their non-extradition status may encourage people, particularly high-net-worth individuals, to emigrate to their countries.

While most of the world has extradition treaties with the US in place, a number of countries do not. Some of these, like North Korea, are not surprising, considering the state of foreign affairs. Other countries, like Switzerland, have extradition treaties but do not extradite for certain financial crimes. Still, other countries have no extradition agreement with the US at all.

Extradition treaties are in the nature of a contract

Afghanistan is among the countries that do not have an extradition treaty with the United States. This means that Afghanistan will not extradite individuals who are wanted by the US government.

Most modern extradition treaties contain an explicit list of crimes for which extradition may be granted. They also identify various classes of offenses for which extradition may or must be denied. Common among these are provisions excluding purely military and political offenses, capital offenses, and crimes that are punishable under only the laws of one of the parties to the treaty. Other common exclusions are crimes committed outside the country seeking extradition, crimes where the fugitive is a national of the country of refuge, and crimes barred by double jeopardy or a statute of limitations.

The precise menu for an extradition hearing is dictated by the applicable extradition treaty. A common checklist for a hearing includes determinations that there exists a valid extradition treaty between the two countries, the relator is the person sought, the offense charged is extraditable, and the offense charged satisfies the requirement of double criminality. It is also determined if there is "probable cause" to believe the relator committed the offense charged and if the documents required are presented in accordance with the laws and treaty requirements of the requesting state.

The US can extradite without a treaty in certain circumstances

The United States can extradite individuals from foreign countries without an extradition treaty in certain circumstances. While extradition is typically governed by treaties, there are exceptions that allow for extradition in the absence of a formal agreement. Here are some scenarios where extradition can occur without a treaty:

• Crimes Against U.S. Nationals: The United States may extradite individuals who have committed crimes of violence against U.S. nationals abroad, even without an extradition treaty. This exception is outlined in the U.S. Code (18 U.S.C. 3181 and 3184), which permits extradition for crimes such as murder, assault, or kidnapping of U.S. citizens overseas.
• Provisional Arrest: In urgent cases, the United States may request the provisional arrest of a fugitive in a foreign country, pending the submission of a formal extradition request. This process is often used when there is a risk of flight, and it can facilitate the detention of the individual while the necessary documents for a formal extradition request are prepared.
• Diplomatic Negotiations: Diplomatic channels can play a crucial role in facilitating extraditions, even in the absence of a treaty. Diplomatic negotiations between the United States and the foreign country may lead to ad hoc arrangements or case-by-case agreements for extradition.
• Implied Consent: In some instances, the absence of an extradition treaty does not necessarily imply a refusal to extradite. The United States may interpret silence or a lack of response from a foreign country as implied consent to extradition.
• International Agreements: The United States is a party to several international agreements and multilateral conventions that contain provisions for extradition. These agreements may supersede the requirement for a bilateral extradition treaty and facilitate extradition for certain offenses outlined in these conventions.
• Reciprocity: While not a direct means of extradition, the principle of reciprocity can play a role in encouraging cooperation between countries. The United States may offer to extradite individuals to a foreign country in exchange for that country's cooperation in extraditing individuals to the United States.

It is important to note that the absence of an extradition treaty does not guarantee immunity from extradition. The United States may still pursue diplomatic negotiations, provisional arrests, or other legal avenues to secure the extradition of individuals from foreign countries, even in the absence of a formal treaty.

Extradition treaties can be bilateral or multilateral

Extradition is the formal process of one state surrendering an individual to another state for prosecution or punishment for crimes committed in the requesting country's jurisdiction. Extradition treaties can be bilateral or multilateral, and they act as examples of international cooperation in international dispute resolution.

The United States, for example, has relied almost exclusively on bilateral agreements as a basis for extradition. However, the US has also entered into several multilateral agreements that may provide legal authority for extradition. These agreements can take two forms. The first is a multilateral agreement that exclusively concerns extradition. The US is currently a party to two such agreements: the 1933 Montevideo Convention on Extradition and the Extradition Agreement with the European Union, which entered into force in February 2010. The second form of multilateral agreement includes extradition provisions, such as the US-EU extradition treaty, which is implemented via bilateral instruments concluded between the US and each EU member state.

The United States has signed extradition treaties with many countries around the world, including allies like Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom. However, some countries do not have extradition treaties with the US, including Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, and many others. The absence of extradition treaties can be due to various reasons, such as political tensions, human rights concerns, or differences in legal systems.

Extradition treaties can be limited by the laws of the country of refuge

Extradition treaties are agreements between countries to surrender individuals who are wanted for criminal prosecution or sentencing in the requesting country. The laws of the country of refuge and the applicable extradition treaty govern extradition back to the United States of a fugitive located overseas. The laws of the country of refuge may allow for the extradition of a fugitive even in the absence of a treaty. However, the existence of a treaty does not guarantee that both countries will follow through with their end of the agreement.

The laws of the country of refuge may limit extradition in the following ways:

• Political differences: Countries may refuse extradition requests due to political differences with the requesting country.
• Human rights concerns: Countries may refuse to extradite individuals if they believe they will be subject to human rights violations, such as torture or the death penalty, in the requesting country.
• Absence of a treaty: Countries that do not have an extradition treaty with the requesting country may refuse to extradite fugitives.
• Refusal to extradite nationals: Many countries have laws prohibiting the extradition of their own citizens. However, some countries, including the United States, have entered into treaties that allow for the extradition of their citizens under certain circumstances.
• Procedural considerations: Extradition may be denied based on procedural considerations such as double jeopardy or statutes of limitations.
• Other legal protections: The country of refuge's legal protections and extradition procedures may also impact the extradition process.

Frequently asked questions