Cell Phone Conundrum: American Military Personnel In Afghanistan Navigate Communication Challenges

The use of cell phones by military personnel in Afghanistan has been a subject of debate and concern due to security risks and data leaks. While some soldiers may find it essential to stay connected with their families and friends back home, the insecure nature of cell phones can pose a threat to operational security. In the past, there have been instances of varying policies and practices regarding the use of cell phones by American military personnel in Afghanistan. Some units, like the Army 82nd Airborne Division, have prohibited soldiers from carrying cell phones, laptops, and other personal electronic devices during their deployment to the Middle East. However, there are also reports of soldiers purchasing and using cell phones during their deployment, which can potentially compromise their security. The decision to allow or restrict the use of cell phones by the military in Afghanistan is made on a case-by-case basis, considering the specific circumstances and security concerns of each deployment.

Security risks of soldiers using smartphones

Smartphones have become an integral part of our lives, and soldiers are no exception. However, the use of smartphones by soldiers, especially in war zones, poses several security risks.

Firstly, turning on a smartphone creates a digital signal that can be tracked by enemies to pinpoint a soldier's location. This signal can be detected through the cellular network or GPS, allowing the enemy to launch targeted attacks using artillery, missiles, or airstrikes.

Secondly, smartphones are vulnerable to data leaks and security breaches. Apps often collect and share personal and device data without users' knowledge, and many apps leak data due to poor design or lack of updates. Spyware can be used to access text messages, track calls, collect passwords, and activate microphones and cameras, compromising sensitive military information.

Thirdly, metadata collected by smartphones, such as time stamps, sender and receiver information, and device location, can be exploited by enemies even if soldiers avoid explicit location disclosure. This metadata can be intercepted through signal intelligence (SIGINT), human intelligence (HUMINT), or imagery intelligence (IMINT), enabling enemies to track movements and identify patterns for targeted attacks.

Additionally, soldiers' smartphones can be physically confiscated, providing direct access to sensitive data. This risk is heightened when soldiers use local SIM cards, as unique identifiers can be traced back to the phone's provenance, potentially exposing troop movements and individual soldiers to tracking even when they return home.

Furthermore, mobile applications designed for the battlefield, while improving soldiers' situational awareness, also introduce risks of malware and cyberattacks. Stolen credentials can be used to infiltrate central command and control systems, compromising national security.

Lastly, biometrics used for smartphone security, such as facial recognition and fingerprint sensors, raise privacy concerns. Biometric data is vulnerable to hacking, and if stored on mass-market devices, it could be a target for America's enemies or compromised by careless security practices.

To mitigate these risks, militaries employ various strategies, including educating soldiers, providing secure communication devices, using signal jamming, and monitoring phone usage. Some countries have banned smartphones for soldiers altogether, while others encourage the use of secure platforms like RealTyme, which offers military-grade secure communication and advanced security features.

Data leaks from cell phones

How Data Can Be Leaked From Cell Phones

Data leakage from mobile applications is a common problem in the industry. Certain Android applications, including those bundled with the OS such as Calendar, Contacts, and Picasa, send data in a clear rather than encrypted format. This data can include authentication tokens, which are a form of password used to identify a user. Additionally, these tokens have a long life (up to 14 days) and can be used elsewhere, even on a different handset, making it easy for hackers to steal legitimate user credentials.

Another way that data can be leaked is through cell phone networks. Network providers use signaling protocols that have known weaknesses, making it easy to intercept calls and messages. More than half of the attempts to tap calls made on 3G networks are successful, while nine out of ten SMS messages can be intercepted.

Furthermore, many apps leak data continuously due to poor design or the user's failure to install updates. Some apps also access and share personal and device data unnecessarily, exposing users to potential threats.

Preventing Data Leaks From Cell Phones

To prevent data leakage, it is important to follow certain practices and stay vigilant. Here are some measures that can be taken:

• Keep the operating system and applications up to date.
• Enable two-step verification for applications.
• Lock the cell phone screen to prevent unauthorized access.
• Do not enable the display of notifications and message previews on the lock screen.
• Avoid clicking on suspicious links and promotions, as they may install malicious applications.
• Do not store sensitive data on your phone, especially if it is not encrypted or password-protected.
• Use secure networks and avoid open or public Wi-Fi networks.
• Be cautious when connecting to public Wi-Fi networks, as they may have security flaws that allow data interception.
• Be wary of "social engineering," where unknown people may try to obtain your data through social media or other means.
• Use apps that are approved by official sources, such as Google or Apple, as they are less likely to pose a risk to your personal information.

Bans on personal devices for soldiers

Complete Bans on Personal Devices

The British Army, for instance, has imposed a categorical ban on soldiers using their phones while deployed in Afghanistan. Similarly, the Turkish military banned smartphone use by soldiers on base in 2015, and Russia followed suit in 2019, prohibiting on-duty armed forces from using tablets and smartphones. These bans aim to mitigate security risks and protect sensitive information.

Restricted Use of Personal Devices

In contrast, the US military generally allows the use of personal devices with restrictions. For example, the Anniston Army Depot permits cell phones on the installation but prohibits activities such as video recording, photography, and audio recording. The US military has also banned certain apps, such as TikTok, on government-issued devices due to security concerns.

Bans During Deployment

During deployments, soldiers are often ordered to leave their personal devices behind, as seen with American soldiers sent to Eastern Europe following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. This measure ensures operational security but can make it challenging for service members to stay connected with their loved ones. To address this, organizations like the USO provide alternative means of communication, such as secure telephone networks and free Wi-Fi.

Bans on Specific Functionality

Instead of banning devices entirely, some militaries opt to prohibit specific functionalities. Since 2018, the US military has forbidden the GPS-enabled functioning of personal devices on deployment. This decision aims to protect the privacy and security of service members and prevent potential tracking by adversarial entities.

Bans Based on Location

Some bans on personal devices are specific to certain locations. For instance, Indian soldiers along the "Line of Actual Control" in the Himalayas are forbidden from using Chinese apps like Weibo and WeChat. Similarly, the Israeli Defence Forces' liberal policy on cell phone use may be partly due to their ability to use domestic service providers, reducing security risks.

In summary, bans on personal devices for soldiers vary across militaries and are influenced by security concerns, data leaks, operational security, and cultural and political factors. These bans can range from complete prohibitions to restricted use, depending on the specific context and perceived risks.

Local SIM cards and security concerns

Using a local SIM card in Afghanistan could potentially expose American military personnel to security risks. SIM cards can be hacked, and this can lead to identity theft, with scammers posing as the card owner and accessing sensitive information.

SIM Card Hacks

Hackers can use various methods to hack SIM cards, including SIM-jacking, SIM swapping, and SIM cloning. SIM-jacking involves sending an SMS with a link that, when clicked, gives the hacker access to calls, texts, and geolocation. SIM swapping involves gathering information about the target and then contacting the mobile carrier, pretending to be the target, and claiming that the SIM card has been lost or stolen. SIM cloning, on the other hand, involves physically accessing the SIM card and copying its data onto a blank card.

Security Concerns for Military Personnel

The use of personal cell phones by soldiers in Afghanistan has been a controversial issue. While some soldiers have been allowed to use their phones, others have been banned from doing so due to security risks. Cell phones are vulnerable to data leaks and can be exploited by attackers to access sensitive information, track locations, and intercept communications. This poses a significant risk to military personnel, as it could compromise operational security and put soldiers at risk.

Recommendations

To mitigate security concerns, American military personnel in Afghanistan should avoid using local SIM cards and personal cell phones. Instead, they should rely on secure communication methods provided by the military, which have been vetted and approved for use in operational environments. Additionally, they should be cautious about sharing personal information online and be vigilant about suspicious messages, calls, or emails. By following these precautions, they can reduce the risk of their data being compromised.

Cyberattacks and sensitive information

The use of mobile devices has become integral to the way we work, communicate, and bank, creating new opportunities for malware and a wider attack surface for cybercriminals. Mobile devices are just as vulnerable to cyberattacks as computers, and users are generally less wary of potential threats on their phones. As such, cyberattacks on mobile devices are becoming more common.

Mobile devices can be attacked at different levels, including malicious apps, network-level attacks, and the exploitation of vulnerabilities within the devices and the mobile operating system. One of the most common types of cyberattacks is phishing, where attackers send fake and fraudulent messages to lure users into sharing personal information or downloading malware. A mobile version of this is smishing, where phishing attempts are sent via SMS text.

Another common type of cyberattack is the man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack, where an attacker intercepts communications between two parties to eavesdrop on or modify the data being transmitted. Mobile devices are especially susceptible to MitM attacks as SMS messages can be easily intercepted, and mobile applications may use unencrypted HTTP for the transfer of potentially sensitive information.

Malicious applications are another significant threat to mobile devices. One of the most common types is the Trojan, which is used 95% of the time. It involves luring the owner of the phone to deposit a backdoor or rootkit that allows the attacker to spy discreetly, delete or modify data. A malicious application may also contain spyware, which can be used to retrieve a maximum amount of information.

To prevent cyberattacks, it is important to adopt security measures such as using antivirus software, firewalls, and virtual private networks (VPNs). It is also crucial to stay vigilant when downloading applications and to avoid clicking on suspicious links. Additionally, keeping mobile devices and applications updated with the latest versions of the operating system and software can help patch security vulnerabilities.

In the context of the American military, the use of personal cell phones by soldiers can pose a significant security risk. Cell phones are vulnerable to various cyberattacks, and soldiers may inadvertently expose sensitive information or compromise operational security. To mitigate these risks, the military often imposes restrictions on the use of personal cell phones during deployments or in certain locations.

Frequently asked questions