Bolivian Deforestation: Understanding The Devastating Loss Of Forests

Deforestation in Bolivia is a growing problem, with the country losing almost 596,000 hectares of forest in 2022 alone. The main driver of deforestation in Bolivia is agriculture, particularly the expansion of soy plantations to meet growing demand for livestock feed. This has been encouraged by the Bolivian government's focus on economic development, with President Luis Arce pursuing an ambitious growth agenda without concrete plans to safeguard the environment. In addition, the country has seen an influx of Mennonite settlers, who have legally purchased large areas of land to expand their rural lifestyles, contributing to a quarter of the deforestation caused by soy plantations.

Agricultural expansion

The eastern department of Santa Cruz, home to most of Bolivia's soy production, has witnessed the brunt of deforestation. The Chiquitano dry forest, a rich biome supporting a diverse range of species, has been particularly affected. The expansion of soy plantations in this region has resulted in the loss of nearly 19% of the Chiquitano forest.

The Bolivian government's focus on economic development and encouragement of soy production to meet export demands have contributed to the increasing rates of deforestation. The government has implemented policies, such as increased soy export quotas and changes in land assignment, allowing for the conversion of forest areas into agricultural land. Additionally, the government has granted numerous permits for land deforestation and has been lenient towards illegal deforestation, imposing negligible fines.

The agricultural industry, driven by both local farmers and larger agricultural producers, has expanded its operations into vulnerable areas like the dry forest biome of Chiquitanía in the Beni and Santa Cruz departments. This expansion has exacerbated the impacts of drought and fires caused by climate change in these regions.

Mennonite communities, who have legally purchased land to expand their rural lifestyles, have also contributed to deforestation in Bolivia. While their impact has been significant, other groups, including local farmers and larger agricultural producers, have also played a role in clearing land for soy production.

Government policy

The Bolivian government has been encouraging deforestation by implementing policies and legislation that favour economic development and agricultural expansion over environmental protection. Here are some key aspects of the government's policies contributing to deforestation:

Encouraging Agricultural Expansion

The Bolivian government has actively promoted the expansion of soy plantations and cattle ranching to meet the growing demand for exports and domestic consumption. This shift in economic focus has led to the conversion of forest lands into agricultural areas. The government has increased soy export quotas and changed land assignments, allowing agriculture in protected natural reserves and indigenous community areas.

Regulatory Framework and Permits

The government has created a favourable regulatory framework by granting permits for deforestation and retroactively approving illegal deforestation. The fines for illegal deforestation are negligible, providing little deterrent. The government has also increased the amount of land that can be legally deforested, making it easier for agricultural businesses to clear forests.

Economic Incentives

The government provides economic incentives, such as loans from Bolivian banks to finance soy production expansion. Land speculation is also driven by the potential for higher profits, as clearing land can secure land tenure and increase its value. Additionally, the Bolivian state heavily subsidises fuel, making it cheaper to operate machinery for deforestation and agriculture.

Biofuel Development

The government has launched a programme to develop biofuels, investing $700 million. This initiative could increase the demand for soy and drive further deforestation. The production of biofuels will also lead to the clearing of Amazon Forest areas in proposed provinces, affecting rich biodiversity.

Lack of Effective Land-Use Governance

Bolivia lacks an effective land-use governance system with rigorous licensing and appropriate sanctions for illegal deforestation. This lack of governance makes it challenging to hold those engaging in illegal deforestation accountable.

Opposition to Market-Based Conservation

Bolivia has rejected market-based conservation incentives such as Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+). Instead, the government focuses on non-market alternatives, which may not provide sufficient incentives to protect forests.

Food Sovereignty Goals

Bolivia has announced a goal of food sovereignty, aiming to expand food production to meet the needs of its growing population. This goal puts pressure on forests, as more land is needed for agriculture.

In summary, the Bolivian government's policies favour short-term economic gains through agricultural expansion and development at the expense of environmental protection. The lack of effective governance, incentives for agricultural growth, and opposition to market-based conservation measures contribute to the ongoing deforestation crisis in the country.

Economic development

The Bolivian government's focus on economic development is a key factor in the country's deforestation crisis. While the government has been successful in growing the economy and reducing poverty, its policies have come at the cost of the country's forests.

The Patriotic Agenda 2025, for example, outlines ambitious socio-economic development goals for 2021-25, but notably lacks concrete plans for environmental protection. This reflects a broader prioritization of economic growth over environmental conservation.

A significant driver of deforestation in Bolivia is the expansion of soy plantations to meet growing export demand. The government has encouraged this expansion by creating a favourable regulatory framework, increasing soy export quotas, and changing land assignments to allow agriculture in forest areas. This has resulted in a 259% increase in deforestation rates over the last eight years, with Bolivia losing almost 596,000 hectares of forest in 2022 alone.

The soy sector in Bolivia is less productive compared to other countries, with lower yields per hectare. As a result, more land is needed to produce soy, leading to increased deforestation. In addition, loans from Bolivian banks are readily available to finance the expansion of soy production, and land speculation also drives deforestation, as clearing land is seen as a way to secure land tenure.

Another example of the government's economic focus is the creation of the Bolivia Agricultural Production Company (EBPA) through Supreme Decree 4701. While the stated aim of this law is to strengthen domestic food security and enhance the economy, it also allows for the use of public lands by EBPA and emphasizes the marketing of products in international markets. However, the industry exports a significant majority of its soy products, and the law appears to prioritize economic growth over environmental protection.

The government has also promoted the expansion of biodiesel production, including palm oil, through the establishment of the Bolivian Ecological Oil Industry Productive Public Company (IBAE). This expansion will likely result in the clearing of vast swathes of Amazon Forest and negatively impact the rich biodiversity of these forests.

In summary, while the Bolivian government's focus on economic development has yielded positive results in terms of economic growth and poverty reduction, it has come at the cost of the country's forests. The expansion of soy plantations, the creation of the EBPA, and the push for biodiesel production are all examples of how the government's economic priorities are contributing to deforestation in Bolivia.

Food insecurity

• Deforestation disrupts the water cycle and affects water sources. Glacial retreat caused by deforestation reduces water availability from mountain rivers and lakes, leading to water shortages. This, in turn, impacts agricultural productivity and the ability to grow food.
• Deforestation leads to soil erosion, degradation, and pollution. The intensive use of machinery and chemicals in agriculture contributes to soil degradation and water pollution, reducing land productivity and the ability to sustain food production over the long term.
• Deforestation contributes to climate change and extreme weather events. The loss of forest cover alters local weather patterns and increases the frequency of natural disasters, affecting agricultural output and food availability.
• Deforestation destroys habitats and ecosystems. The conversion of forests into agricultural land results in the loss of biodiversity, including plant and animal species that are important for food sources and ecological balance.
• Deforestation affects indigenous communities disproportionately. Indigenous peoples in Bolivia depend on forests for their livelihoods, and the loss of forest resources impacts their ability to produce food and maintain their traditional ways of life.
• Deforestation contributes to flooding. The clearing of forests, particularly in the Amazon region, makes the area more susceptible to flooding, which in turn impacts agricultural production and food availability.
• Deforestation leads to the expansion of cattle ranching and soy production. The proliferation of surfaces for cattle grazing and soy cultivation reduces the land available for diverse food production, contributing to a less resilient and less nutritious food system.
• Deforestation results in social and economic inequalities. Men migrate to cities for work, while women, lacking alternative income sources, are more vulnerable to poverty due to the loss of agriculture and subsistence farming.
• Deforestation is driven by government policies. The Bolivian government's focus on economic development and agriculture, without adequate environmental safeguards, contributes to deforestation and exacerbates food insecurity.

Foreign investment

The Bolivian government's focus on economic development and the creation of favourable policies for agricultural expansion have attracted foreign investors interested in taking advantage of the country's natural resources. The government has granted increasing numbers of permits for deforestation and has even retrospectively approved land cleared without permission, with illegal deforestation rarely penalised.

In addition, the government's support for the expansion of soy plantations to meet growing export demand has encouraged foreign investment in this sector. The government has increased soy export quotas and changed land assignments to allow agriculture in certain areas. For example, in the department of Beni, the government has allowed for the use of public lands by the Bolivia Agricultural Production Company (EBPA), which has been linked to widespread illegal deforestation.

Foreign investors have also contributed to deforestation through the establishment of large-scale farming operations. These operations have cleared land for commodity crops, particularly soybeans, with little regard for environmental protection. The arrival of foreign investors in the 1980s and 1990s led to the clearing of broad areas of land, leaving distinctive rectangular deforestation patterns.

The expansion of soy plantations by foreign investors has had a devastating impact on the Chiquitano dry forest in eastern Bolivia, home to a rich biome of wildlife, including maned wolves, giant otters, and armadillos. The intensity of deforestation linked to soy expansion in Bolivia is much worse than in other South American countries, with 31.8 hectares of native vegetation cleared for every thousand tonnes of soy produced in 2021.

Frequently asked questions