Russia's Fault: Austria-Hungary's Arguments For Blame

Austria-Hungary could have argued that Russia was to blame for the outbreak of World War One, given that Russia was the first country to mobilise its army, which was seen as a symbolic declaration of war. Russia continued to prepare its military while diplomatic negotiations for peace were ongoing, and this militarism threatened other countries, such as Germany. Russia was part of the Triple Entente along with Britain and France, and this alliance was getting stronger while the Triple Alliance (including Germany and Austria-Hungary) was getting weaker. Russia also used French money to build railways to the German border, which could be seen as a threatening move. Russia encouraged its ally Serbia to use military approaches and provided them with arms and ammunition. In addition, Russia had a lot of motives for wanting war: it felt the war would help it gain access to the straights for trading purposes, and it resented being at the mercy of Germany's industrial power.

Austria-Hungary was the first to declare war on Serbia, and Germany followed through on its promise to support them

Austria-Hungary's declaration of war on Serbia was the culmination of several factors. Firstly, the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne, by a Serbian-backed terrorist group on 28 June 1914 provided a casus belli. Austria-Hungary sought to punish Serbia and crush Serbian nationalism, which it saw as a threat to the stability of its multi-ethnic empire. Additionally, tensions between Austria-Hungary and Serbia had been building for years, with Austria-Hungary's annexation of Bosnia in 1908 and Serbia's ambitions to unify Southeast Europe's Slavic people further straining relations.

Germany played a crucial role in encouraging and supporting Austria-Hungary's aggression towards Serbia. On 5 July, Germany promised Austria-Hungary full support for a severe response against Serbia, issuing what became known as a "blank cheque". Germany shared Austria-Hungary's desire to crush Serbia and was determined to maintain Austria-Hungary as its only reliable ally. Germany also feared 'encirclement' by rival alliances and wanted to demonstrate its strength.

However, the decision to go to war was not without hesitation and debate within Austria-Hungary. Some Austrian leaders, such as Prime Minister István Tisza of Hungary, opposed war with Serbia, correctly predicting that it would trigger a wider European conflict. Nonetheless, the pro-war faction prevailed, arguing that war was necessary to re-invigorate the Habsburg monarchy and deal with Serbia before it became too powerful.

On 23 July, Austria-Hungary, with the guarantee of German backing, issued an ultimatum to Serbia, intending to start a war. The ultimatum was designed to be unacceptable to Serbia, and when Serbia's reply conceded to most but not all of the terms, Austria-Hungary used this as its excuse to declare war on 28 July. Despite knowing that this risked war with Russia, Serbia's supporter, Austria-Hungary was prepared to take this risk due to the assurance of German support.

Germany's support for Austria-Hungary was instrumental in the escalation of the conflict. Germany's ambitions, fear of 'encirclement', and perception of isolation drove its foreign policy. Additionally, Germany's war plan was time-sensitive, as it aimed to knock out France before Russia could fully mobilise its army. Thus, Germany's leaders felt pressured to act and supported Austria-Hungary's aggressive actions. When Russia ordered a partial mobilisation of its forces on 30 July, Germany perceived this as an aggressive act of war and used it to justify its own mobilisation and subsequent declaration of war on Russia on 1 August.

In conclusion, while Austria-Hungary was the first to declare war on Serbia, Germany played a significant role in encouraging and supporting these actions. The complex network of alliances, competing interests, and fear of losing prestige among the European powers created a volatile environment that ultimately led to the outbreak of World War I.

The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was carried out by a group of Serbian terrorists, and Austria-Hungary used this as an excuse to attack Serbia

The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir presumptive to the Austro-Hungarian throne, and his wife Sophie, Duchess of Hohenberg, was carried out by a group of six armed irredentists, five Bosnian Serbs and one Bosnian Muslim, on 28 June 1914. The assassination was the immediate cause of World War I. Austria-Hungary sought to inflict a military blow on Serbia, blaming the country for the actions of Gavrilo Princip, a Bosnian Serb nationalist, and his fellow conspirators.

Austria-Hungary's subsequent actions were influenced by a desire to demonstrate its strength and to dampen Serbian support for Yugoslav nationalism, which it viewed as a threat to the unity of its multinational empire. However, Austria-Hungary was wary of provoking Russia, a major supporter of Serbia, and so sought a guarantee of support from its ally, Germany. Germany provided this assurance, later known as the "blank cheque", urging Austria-Hungary to attack Serbia quickly to localise the war and avoid drawing in Russia.

Austria-Hungary's ultimatum to Serbia, delivered on 23 July, was designed to be unacceptable to Serbia, and indeed, Serbia only partially accepted the terms. This rejection of the ultimatum, along with the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, provided the pretext for Austria-Hungary to declare war on Serbia on 28 July.

While the assassination of Franz Ferdinand was the catalyst for these events, it is important to recognise that the complex web of alliances between European powers, coupled with the miscalculations of political and military leaders, ultimately led to the outbreak of World War I.

Austria-Hungary was told by other countries not to start a war, but they put their interests above keeping peace

Austria-Hungary's aggression towards Serbia stemmed from fears that, if it backed down, it would lose credibility and prestige as a great power. The country's actions were also driven by a desire to preserve its dominance in the region and quash support for Serbian nationalism. It saw Serbia as a threat to the stability of its multi-ethnic empire and wanted to prevent Serbian ambitions to unify southeast Europe's Slavic people.

Austria-Hungary's decision to go to war was influenced by its alliance with Germany, which provided military support and encouragement. Germany's ambitions, its perception of isolation, and its fear of 'encirclement' by opposing alliance systems also played a role in its decision to back Austria-Hungary's aggressive stance.

The preservation of Austria-Hungary as a great power became an important part of German policy. Germany's leaders saw the Balkan crisis as an opportunity to inflict a diplomatic setback on Russia and France. They also wanted to maintain their alliance with Austria-Hungary, even if it meant going against their own national interests.

By ignoring warnings from other countries and putting their own interests first, Austria-Hungary and its allies set off a chain of events that led to a global conflict. Their actions ignited old tensions and anxieties across Europe, drawing in supporters and allies on both sides. This ultimately resulted in a world war that shaped the continent and the world in the 20th century.

Germany issued Austria-Hungary a blank cheque for military support, and they could have refused it

On the 5th of July 1914, Germany issued Austria-Hungary a "blank cheque" of military support, pledging its unconditional support for whatever action Austria-Hungary chose to take against Serbia. This pledge was made by Kaiser Wilhelm II, who was outraged by the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, an incident that had occurred just a week prior. Although this pledge was a decisive moment in the chain of events leading up to World War I, Austria-Hungary could have refused it. Here are some reasons why:

Firstly, Austria-Hungary could have refused the blank cheque because they had the option to delay the war. Germany urged Austria-Hungary to attack Serbia quickly to localise the conflict and avoid drawing in Russia. However, Austro-Hungarian leaders deliberated until mid-July before deciding to give Serbia an ultimatum, demonstrating that they had some control over the timing of the conflict.

Secondly, Austria-Hungary could have refused the blank cheque because they were initially hesitant to start a war. They were wary of the reaction of Russia, a major supporter of Serbia, and sought a guarantee of support from Germany before taking any action. This indicates that Austria-Hungary was not eager to rush into a conflict and may have been open to alternative solutions.

Thirdly, Austria-Hungary could have refused the blank cheque because they knew that a war with Serbia carried the risk of escalating into a wider European war. They were aware of the complex web of alliances that existed between the major powers of Europe and the potential for hostilities to spread. By refusing the blank cheque, Austria-Hungary could have explored other options to address their concerns with Serbia without resorting to military action.

Additionally, Austria-Hungary could have refused the blank cheque due to internal divisions within their government. While some members of the Council of Joint Ministers were hawkish and advocated for a surprise attack on Serbia, others, like István Tisza, the Prime Minister of Hungary, opposed the idea of war. Tisza correctly predicted that a war with Serbia would trigger a conflict with Russia and lead to a general European war. Austria-Hungary could have heeded Tisza's warnings and sought alternative solutions to address their issues with Serbia.

Finally, Austria-Hungary could have refused the blank cheque because they knew that Germany's offer of support was based on faulty assumptions. German leaders assumed that Austria-Hungary was ready to initiate war against Serbia immediately and that Russia was not militarily prepared for a general European war. However, Austria-Hungary may have had access to information that contradicted these assumptions and could have used this knowledge to make a different decision.

In conclusion, while Germany's "blank cheque" of military support was a significant factor in the lead-up to World War I, Austria-Hungary could have refused it. They had alternatives to immediate military action, internal divisions within their government, and knowledge of the risks associated with escalating the conflict. By refusing the blank cheque, Austria-Hungary could have potentially avoided the catastrophic consequences of World War I.

Austria-Hungary wanted to start a war against Serbia with the help of Germany

Austria-Hungary was also encouraged by its ally, Germany, which promised full support for a severe response against Serbia. On July 5, 1914, Germany guaranteed its support through what came to be known as the "blank cheque". However, Germany urged Austria-Hungary to attack quickly to localize the war and avoid drawing in Russia, Serbia's ally.

Austria-Hungary's aggression towards Serbia stemmed from fears that, if it backed down, it would lose credibility and prestige as a great power. On July 23, 1914, with the guarantee of German backing, Austria-Hungary issued an ultimatum to Serbia, intending to start a war. Serbia's sovereignty would be destroyed if it accepted the terms in full, but any reply other than unconditional acceptance would give Austria-Hungary its excuse for war.

On July 28, 1914, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia. It was determined to take decisive action against Serbia and, by now, knew this risked war with Russia. Austria-Hungary was prepared to risk war because it had the guarantee of German support. The Balkan crisis now threatened a European-wide war.

Frequently asked questions