Austria's Separation Of Powers: Effective Or Not?

The Austrian Constitution is based on the principle of the separation of powers, dividing the tasks of the state into three branches: the legislative, executive and judicial. This principle is enshrined in the Constitution, which is split across multiple acts, with the Federal Constitutional Law (Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz) at its centre. The separation of powers is intended to ensure that no one institution can become too powerful in a democracy.

The Austrian system of government is similar to that of larger federal republics such as Germany and the United States, with the main difference being that Austria's states have very little autonomy. The Austrian Constitution characterises the republic as a federation consisting of nine autonomous federal states.

However, almost all matters of importance, from defence to criminal law, are decided at the federal level. The judiciary is also almost entirely federal, with the exception of nine state administrative courts.

The legislative power is vested in the Parliament, which consists of two houses: the National Council and the Federal Council. The executive power is shared by the Federal President and the Federal Cabinet, while the judiciary is made up of the Constitutional Court and the Administrative Court.

Despite the principle of separation of powers, legislative bodies can assume certain administrative tasks and have certain participation rights.

The Austrian Constitution and separation of powers

The Austrian Constitution is based on the principle of the separation of powers, dividing the tasks of the state into three branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial. This means that administration is separate from the judiciary and the legislation, which is in the hands of the National Assembly and Federal Assembly at the federal level, and of provincial parliaments at the provincial level.

The legislative branch is responsible for passing laws and supervising their implementation. It is exercised by the National and Federal Councils, and the Provincial Diets. The implementation of laws is the task of the executive and judicial branches. The executive branch includes the Federal Government, the Federal President, and all federal authorities, including the police and armed forces. The judicial branch is responsible for administering justice, deciding disputes independently and impartially, and ensuring compliance with the laws.

The separation of powers is an essential element of the Rule of Law and is enshrined in the Austrian Constitution. It ensures that each branch can check the others, preventing any one institution from becoming too powerful in a democracy. This system of checks and balances ensures that the three powers interact in an equitable and balanced way.

The Austrian Constitution has undergone several amendments over the years, including a significant revision in 1929 that broadened the powers of the Federal President. The Constitution was temporarily replaced by a new basic law in 1934, defining Austria as an authoritarian corporate state, but it was reinstated on May 1, 1945, following the country's reestablishment as an independent republic.

The Austrian Constitution also guarantees basic rights and freedoms for all citizens, with no distinctions based on birth, gender, status, class, or religion. It ensures equal treatment under the law and protects civil liberties, including freedom of assembly, association, and expression.

The three branches of power

The Austrian Constitution is based on the principle of the separation of powers, which divides the tasks of the state into three branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial. This system ensures that power is shared and each branch can check the others, preventing any one institution from becoming too powerful. Here is a closer look at each of these three branches:

The Legislative Branch

The first power among the three has the task of creating laws and overseeing their implementation. The legislative branch is made up of Parliament, which includes the National Council and the Federal Council, as well as the Provincial Diets. The National Council is considered the more powerful chamber, and Austrians often use the term "parliament" to refer specifically to it. Most federal legislation originates in the National Council, and it can force a bill into law even if the Federal Council rejects it. The Federal Council, on the other hand, has very limited power to prevent the adoption of legislation.

The Executive Branch

The executive branch is responsible for implementing the laws created by the legislative branch. It comprises the Federal Government, the Federal President, and all federal authorities, including the police and the armed forces. The Federal President is the head of state and is directly elected by the people. While the president has certain powers, such as the authority to dissolve parliament, their role is mostly ceremonial and representative. The Federal Chancellor, who is nominated by the National Council, holds more power in practice.

The Judicial Branch

The third branch is made up of judges who administer justice by deciding disputes independently and impartially. They ensure compliance with the laws and cannot be deposed or assigned to other positions against their will. The judiciary includes three supreme courts: the Constitutional Court, the Administrative Court, and the Asylum Court. The Constitutional Court plays a crucial role in reviewing the constitutionality of laws passed by Parliament and can declare them null and void if found to be unconstitutional.

The role of the Federal President

The Federal President of Austria is the head of state and is endowed with their authority by being sworn in before the Federal Assembly. The Federal President is commander-in-chief of the armed forces, appoints the Federal Chancellor, has the power to dismiss the Government, dissolve the National Council, reject proposed ministers and more. The Federal President is elected for a six-year term and can be held responsible for their actions.

The Federal President's tasks are often confined to examining whether laws have been passed in accordance with the Constitution. However, in exceptional circumstances, such as natural disasters or the outbreak of war, the Federal President has special powers. They can issue emergency decrees to change laws and take extraordinary measures, as well as move the seat of the chief organs of the state and the National Council to a different location.

The Federal President is also responsible for appointing judges and civil servants, and has a free hand in appointing the Federal Chancellor. However, in practice, their power is limited because the Federal Chancellor depends on the confidence of a parliamentary majority, and the Federal President can usually only act on the Federal Government's proposals.

The Federal President can dismiss the Federal Government or the Federal Chancellor if they so decide, but individual Government members can only be dismissed if the Federal Chancellor proposes it. The Federal President can also dissolve the National Council upon the Federal Government's proposal but only once for the same reason. This provision allows for new elections in times of political crisis.

The Federal President is immune to public prosecution. However, the National Council can convene the National Assembly to approve public prosecution of the Federal President. If the Head of State violates the Constitution in their official capacity, the Federal Assembly can bring charges against them before the Constitutional Court.

The Federal President regularly convenes the National Council sessions and can instruct the administration of a binding or non-binding plebiscite. They confirm that laws "have been passed in accordance with the Constitution" before they are made public. However, they do not have the right to reject a law for political reasons and do not hold a veto power.

The independence of the judiciary

The Austrian judiciary is independent of the executive and legislative branches of government. The constitution establishes that judges are independent when acting in their judicial function. They cannot be bound by instructions from a higher court (except in cases of appeal) or by another agency. In administrative matters, judges are subordinate to the Ministry of Justice.

Judges are appointed for life and cannot be removed or reassigned without their consent. In courts with multiple judges, there must be a fixed and specific apportionment of responsibilities to prevent the government from influencing outcomes by hand-picking a judge sympathetic to its perspective. For example, if a litigant files for divorce in a court with multiple judges handling divorce cases, the first letter of their last name decides which judge they are assigned.

The Austrian judiciary is divided into general courts and courts of public law. The general courts handle civil and criminal trials, as well as non-adversary proceedings such as inheritance cases or legal guardianship matters. The courts of public law supervise the other two branches of government: the administrative court system reviews the legality of administrative acts; the Constitutional Court adjudicates on complaints regarding the constitutionality of statutes, the legality of ordinances, and the conduct of elected officials and political appointees in office.

The Austrian model of separation of powers forbids the administrative and judicial branches of government from interfering with each other. This means that subjects cannot take bureaucrats to court or otherwise petition the courts to review the legality of administrative acts. However, the Constitution of 1920 established the Administrative Court and the Constitutional Court, two tribunals that cut across this division.

• Judges are recruited, trained, and employed by the Republic.
• Courts hand down verdicts in the name of the Republic.
• Judges must have a master's degree or equivalent in Austrian law, undergo four years of postgraduate training, and pass an exam to be eligible for appointment.
• Appointments are made by the president, although this responsibility is often delegated to the minister of justice.
• Nominations come from within the judiciary; panels of judges suggest candidates for benches with vacancies.
• Judges are independent and cannot be deposed or assigned other positions against their will.

Media concentration and its impact on democracy

Austria's constitution is based on the principle of the separation of powers, dividing the tasks of the state into three branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial. This separation of powers is reflected in the fact that certain functions must not be exercised by the same person, for example, the Federal President cannot simultaneously be a member of the National Council.

Now, onto the topic of media concentration and its impact on democracy.

Media concentration refers to the trend of a small number of corporations or individuals owning a large number of media outlets, such as newspapers, television channels, or social media platforms. This concentration of ownership can have significant implications for democracy. Firstly, it can lead to a reduction in the diversity of voices represented in the media landscape. A diverse range of news sources and perspectives is essential for a healthy democracy, as it allows citizens to access a variety of information and form their own opinions. Media concentration can also result in the abuse of media power for political or economic purposes. For instance, media owners may use their platforms to influence politics and promote their interests. Additionally, media concentration can impact the quality and objectivity of journalism. When media outlets are controlled by a small number of owners, there may be pressure to prioritise profit over journalistic integrity, leading to biased or sensationalised reporting.

Furthermore, media concentration can limit opportunities for self-expression and hinder the representation of marginalised groups in society. It can also affect the functioning of the democratic system itself. For instance, if a small number of media corporations have a strong influence on public opinion, they can shape political agendas and sway elections. This was particularly evident in the rise of authoritarian populism in some European countries, where media ownership structures provided favourable conditions for such political movements to gain traction.

On the other hand, some argue that media concentration is not inherently detrimental to democracy. They suggest that competition between different news producers can lead to greater diversity in content, even if ownership is concentrated. Additionally, digital platforms and social media have provided new avenues for information dissemination, allowing more individuals to become content creators and reach a wider audience.

Overall, while media concentration may provide certain benefits, it is important to recognise its potential impact on democratic societies. Measures to promote media pluralism and prevent excessive media concentration, such as ownership regulations and strict limits on media mergers, can help safeguard democratic values and ensure a diverse range of voices are represented in the public sphere.

Frequently asked questions