Slander In Australia: What's The Law?

In Australia, defamation laws are a civil matter and are not federal, but a matter for state and territory courts. Defamation laws are in place to protect individuals, groups, and entities from false or damaging statements that may harm their reputation, character, or standing in society. The distinction between libel and slander has been abolished under uniform legislation, meaning plaintiffs can now sue for defamation regarding publications of defamatory matter of both kinds.

Explore related products

The Journalist's Guide to Media Law: A handbook for communicators in a digital world

$49.99 $49.99

Special Damage: The Slander of Women and the Gendered History of Defamation Law (The Cultural Lives of Law)

$110 $110

Media Law: A Practical Guide (Revised Edition) (Peter Lang Media and Communication)

$45.55 $74.15

Defamation Law and Social Attitudes: Ordinary Unreasonable People

$118.72 $192

Defamation: Comparative Law and Practice

$91.2 $120

Comparative Defamation and Privacy Law (Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law Book 32)

$36.03 $50

Libel vs. slander

Slander and libel are both types of defamation. Defamation refers to false statements that harm a person's reputation. Libel is written defamation, while slander is spoken defamation. Libel is usually considered more harmful as it is more permanent and can be more widely distributed, but technology has blurred the lines between the two. Historically, libel and slander were treated differently in court, but Illinois law has since changed to apply the same rules to both types of defamation.

In Australia, defamation laws are defined through a combination of common law and statutory law. The distinction between libel and slander was abolished under the uniform legislation in 2005, and plaintiffs can now sue for defamation regarding publications of defamatory matter of both kinds under the Defamation Act. Defamation damages are not fixed and depend on the circumstances of the case. In Australia, damages can range from small sums to millions of dollars. The limitation period for an action in defamation claims is one year following the publication of the defamatory material, and this can be extended by a court for up to three years.

Explore related products

Tort Law (Key Facts Key Cases)

$41.59 $51.99

Media Law: A Practical Guide (Third Edition)

$47.95 $74.15

Make No Law: The Sullivan Case and the First Amendment

$14.59 $20

Teachers and the Law (Allyn & Bacon Educational Leadership)

$176.58 $219.99

New York Times v. Sullivan: Civil Rights, Libel Law, and the Free Press (Landmark Law Cases and American Society)

$24.99 $29.99

Slander, Slander Per Se and Libel For Law Students: a to z of defamation law for law school students

$29.29

Defamation damages

To succeed in a defamation action, the plaintiff must prove that the material published by the defendant contained one or more defamatory "imputations". Imputation refers to a negative claim about a person or their behaviour. For example, if someone writes a social media post calling another person "a lousy plumber and a crook", the accused might allege that the post contained imputations that they are incompetent and dishonest if those allegations are untrue. Defamatory material can be any type of communication that has been published, including social media posts, comments, replies, pictures, or spoken statements.

There are several defences available to defamation actions in Australia. Some of these defences are grounded in statute, while others are common law defences. Defences available under the Defamation Act include justification, contextual truth, absolute privilege, qualified privilege, fair report on proceedings of public concern, publication of matter concerning an issue of public interest, honest opinion, scientific or academic peer review, and innocent dissemination. The most common defences are that the defendant can prove that what they published was substantially true, or that they were offering their honest opinion, rather than making a statement of fact.

In every state and territory, the limitation period for an action in defamation claims is one year following the publication of the defamatory material. The limitation period can be extended by a court for up to three years after publication if it is satisfied that it is just and reasonable to do so. However, to get an extension, the plaintiff has to prove that it would have been unreasonable for them to sue during the first year after publication.

Explore related products

The law of Libel and Slander

$37.95

Principles and Practice of the Law of Libel and Slander: With Suggestions on the Conduct of a Civil Action, Forms and Precedents, and All Statutes Bearing on the Subject

$19.45

Slander and Sedition in Elizabethan Law, Speech, and Writing

$68.25 $73.7

The Discovery of the Fact (Law And Society In The Ancient World)

$75 $75

A Treatise on the Law of Slander and Libel: and Incidentally of Malicious Prosecutions

$23.4

License to Harass: Law, Hierarchy, and Offensive Public Speech (The Cultural Lives of Law)

$20.98 $47

Defamation defences

Defamation laws in Australia are complex and can be difficult to navigate. There are several defences available to those facing defamation actions, and these can vary between jurisdictions. Here are some of the key defences:

Justification or Truth

This defence is based on the defendant proving that the allegedly defamatory imputations or meanings are true. The plaintiff does not have to prove that these are false. This defence is recognised in the Defamation Act 2005 and is also known as 'justification'. It is available in all Australian jurisdictions, though in some cases, it must be accompanied by a public interest test.

Fair Comment or Honest Opinion

This defence covers situations where the defendant is expressing their opinion rather than stating a fact. It is a common defence and is recognised in the Defamation Act.

Innocent Dissemination or Publication

This defence applies when the defendant innocently distributes defamatory material without being aware of its contents, for example, an employee of a newsagent or library. However, this defence is not available to the author or primary publisher of the material.

Qualified Privilege

Qualified privilege protects honest communication in situations where it is in the public interest to allow people to communicate frankly with each other without fear of defamation claims. This includes fair and accurate reports of parliamentary or judicial proceedings and is recognised in the Defamation Act. However, this defence can be defeated if the plaintiff can prove that the defendant acted with malice or ulterior motives.

Absolute Privilege

This defence covers the reporting of things said during occasions of absolute privilege, such as parliamentary or court proceedings, and is recognised in the Defamation Act 2005. It also covers the broadcast and official reports of such proceedings. No action for defamation can be brought, even if the person making the statement knows it is false and intends to damage the reputation of the plaintiff.

Public Interest

The defendant can defend themselves by proving that the matter concerns an issue of public interest and that they reasonably believed that publishing it was in the public interest. This defence is recognised in the Defamation Act.

Fair Report on Proceedings of Public Concern

This defence applies when the defendant can prove that the matter was a fair report of any proceedings of public concern. It is recognised in the Defamation Act.

Publication of Public Documents

The publication of public documents or fair summaries/extracts from them can be a defence, as recognised in the Defamation Act.

Contextual Truth

This defence applies when the defendant can prove that the most serious imputations are substantially true, thus absolvING them of liability for any defamatory statements that do not further harm the plaintiff's reputation.

It is important to note that these defences may have specific requirements or limitations depending on the jurisdiction within Australia, and seeking independent legal advice is always recommended.

Explore related products

A Treatise on the Law of Libel and Slander / by Franklin Fiske Heard 1860 [Leather Bound]

$44.99 $73.45

Associated Press Stylebook And Libel Manual

$21.42

Libel (1959)

$3.79

Blood Libel: On the Trail of an Antisemitic Myth

$43 $43

LIBEL IN THE FIRST DEGREE: A “GET RICH QUICK” SCHEME

$24.99 $19.99

The Copyright Permission & Libel Handbook: A Step-by-Step Guide for Writers, Editors, and Publishers

$16.61 $21

Defamation proceedings

Prior to commencing court proceedings, the plaintiff must serve a 'concerns notice' on the defendant, specifying the location of the allegedly defamatory material, the defamatory imputations, the harm caused to their reputation, and attaching a copy of the material. This is a mandatory step before initiating legal action.

The limitation period for defamation claims is one year from the date of publication, and court proceedings can be costly. The court may extend this period by up to three years if the plaintiff can demonstrate that it was unreasonable to commence an action within the one-year period.

There are several defences available to defamation actions in Australia, including statutory and common law defences. Some of the defences include justification, contextual truth, absolute privilege, qualified privilege, honest opinion, and innocent dissemination.

Defamation damages are not fixed and depend on the circumstances of the case. Damages can range from small sums to millions of dollars, especially if the defamatory material has caused significant harm, such as financial loss or personal hardship.

Explore related products

Libeled Lady

$3.79

Sued for Libel [ NON-USA FORMAT, PAL, Reg.0 Import - Spain ]

$22.98

Blood Libel: A Matthew Cordwainer Medieval Mystery (Matthew Cordwainer Medieval Mysteries Book 2)

$2.99

Libel [Remaster] by Olivia De Havilland

$21.6

Libel [Remaster] by MGM

$21.6

Cinema Libre Distribution MC Libel

$29.99

Defamation laws

To succeed in a defamation claim, a plaintiff must prove that the material published by the defendant contained defamatory "imputations," or negative claims, about them or their behaviour. Defamatory material can include any form of communication, such as social media posts, comments, replies, written material, pictures, or spoken statements. The test for whether a communication is defamatory is judged from the viewpoint of "ordinary reasonable people in the community" and asks if the communication lowers or harms the plaintiff's reputation, holds them up to ridicule, or leads others to shun them.

There are several defences available to defamation actions in Australia, including justifications such as truth, honest opinion, and absolute privilege. Retractions and apologies will also reduce the amount of damages awarded. The limitation period for bringing a defamation claim is one year from the publication of the defamatory material, although this can be extended by a court up to three years in rare cases.

In terms of corporations, a company cannot usually sue for defamation unless it is an "excluded corporation," such as a not-for-profit or a small company with fewer than ten employees. However, corporations can bring claims for misleading or deceptive conduct or malicious falsehood (injurious falsehood).

Australia's defamation laws continue to evolve, with recent reforms recognising the impact of technological advancements, particularly the rise of social media and search engines. These reforms aim to modernise defamation laws and address issues related to digital intermediaries and online publications.

Frequently asked questions