Bolivian Trade Policy: Protectionist Or Not?

Bolivia, officially the Plurinational State of Bolivia, is a landlocked country in central South America. It is a developing country and the second-poorest in South America, but it has slashed poverty rates and now has one of the fastest-growing economies on the continent. Bolivia's economy is largely driven by its natural resources, including agriculture, forestry, fishing, mining, and goods such as textiles and clothing, refined metals, and refined petroleum. While Bolivia generally does not apply specific restrictions on the trade of industrial and commercial goods, the government has pursued protectionist policies in certain sectors. For example, prior authorisation is required to import certain products, such as soybean and sunflower oils, fruit juices, water, garments, and clothing accessories. Additionally, the importation of used clothing and certain types of vehicles is banned or highly regulated. In terms of labour laws, Bolivia has been characterised by a policy of worker ultra-protection, which has made it difficult for employers to dismiss workers, even in cases of breach of contract or violation of company regulations.

Bolivia's protectionist policies require prior authorization to import certain products, such as soybean oil and clothing

Bolivia has implemented protectionist policies that require prior authorization for the importation of certain products, such as soybean oil and clothing. These measures are designed to regulate the flow of goods into the country and protect domestic industries.

One notable example of Bolivia's protectionist policies is the requirement for prior authorization to import soybean oil and other vegetable oils. This regulation is intended to support local producers and ensure food security. In addition, the Bolivian government has placed restrictions on the importation of clothing and textiles, particularly used clothing and accessories, including shoes. This measure aims to protect the local clothing industry and encourage the development of domestic manufacturing capabilities.

The protectionist policies implemented by Bolivia also extend to other sectors. For instance, the importation of vehicles and vehicle parts is tightly regulated, with specific restrictions on diesel vehicles, liquefied petroleum gas vehicles, and cars with right-side steering. These regulations aim to reduce the environmental impact of transportation and promote the adoption of cleaner energy sources.

Moreover, Bolivia's protectionist stance is reflected in its approach to foreign direct investment. While the country generally allows foreign investment, it prioritizes public investment over private investment, both national and foreign. The Bolivian government has also been known to nationalize previously privatized companies, creating a challenging environment for foreign investors due to weak judicial recourse, corruption, and unclear investment incentives.

The protectionist policies in Bolivia have had both positive and negative impacts. On the one hand, these policies have helped to shield local industries from foreign competition, fostering domestic growth and economic recovery. On the other hand, they have also contributed to a parallel exchange rate and placed limitations on the government's ability to further boost economic growth due to high public debt and modest international reserves. Overall, Bolivia's protectionist stance shapes its trade landscape and influences its economic trajectory.

The country has banned all used-clothing imports to protect its clothing industry

Bolivia has banned all used-clothing imports to protect its clothing industry. This ban is part of the country's protectionist policies, which also include prioritizing public investment over private investment and nationalizing companies. Bolivia's decision to ban used clothing imports was driven by a desire to protect its native clothing industry and promote dignity for its citizens. The country has a rich history of traditional clothing, with the Inca and Aymara peoples known for their weaving skills and signature styles. However, the influx of cheap, used clothing from wealthier nations has made it difficult for local producers to compete, with some resorting to using low-quality imported fabric to keep costs down.

The ban on used clothing imports is part of a broader trend among developing countries attempting to shield their textile industries from competition by China and other manufacturing powerhouses. Bolivia is the 32nd nation to implement such a ban, and the decision has sparked mixed reactions among Bolivians. While some have applauded the move as a step towards dignity and sovereignty, others have protested against it, highlighting the affordability of second-hand clothing. The ban on used clothing imports is just one example of Bolivia's protectionist policies. The country has also pursued policies that prioritize public investment over private investment, as outlined in its 2014 investment promotion law. This law guarantees equal treatment for national and foreign firms but gives the government the power to determine which sectors require private investment.

Additionally, Bolivia has nationalized several companies that were previously privatized in the 1990s. These actions have contributed to a challenging investment climate, with weak judicial recourse, corruption, and unclear investment incentives cited as concerns. Despite these challenges, Bolivia's economy has shown strong historical growth, and the country has largely recovered from the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, high public debt, declining natural gas production, and modest international reserves have limited the government's ability to further boost growth. Bolivia's protectionist policies, such as the ban on used clothing imports, are implemented with the aim of supporting local industries and promoting self-sufficiency.

The ban on used clothing imports in Bolivia is part of a broader set of protectionist policies aimed at shielding local industries from foreign competition. This particular measure seeks to protect the country's clothing industry, which has struggled to compete with the influx of cheap, used clothing from other nations. While the ban has sparked debate among Bolivians, with some praising it as a boost to national pride and others criticizing it for reducing access to affordable clothing, it aligns with the government's overall strategy of prioritizing local industries and promoting economic independence.

Bolivia regulates and imposes export quotas on certain agricultural products, including live bovine animals and fresh bovine meat

Bolivia has a history of protectionist policies, which have been implemented to protect certain industries and manage imports and exports. In recent years, Bolivia has been working to address structural challenges and promote private sector development.

In terms of agricultural products, Bolivia regulates and imposes export quotas on certain goods, including live bovine animals and fresh bovine meat. This means that there is a limit on the amount of these products that can be exported from Bolivia to other countries. The National Service for Agricultural Health and Food Safety (SENASAG) is responsible for issuing prior authorizations for the export of these products, and this process can sometimes cause delays in getting products to market.

Bolivia's regulation of agricultural exports, including live bovine animals and fresh bovine meat, is part of the country's efforts to manage its economy and protect local industries. By imposing export quotas, the Bolivian government can control the supply and pricing of these goods in the domestic market. This can help ensure that there is enough supply to meet domestic demand and that prices remain stable.

In addition to live bovine animals and fresh bovine meat, Bolivia also regulates the export of other agricultural products such as poultry meat, wheat, wheat flour, corn, and rice. The country has also placed restrictions on the export of certain products, such as soybean oil, which requires special authorization. These measures are intended to protect local producers and ensure food security for the country.

While these protectionist policies can help manage the country's economy and protect local industries, they can also have impacts on international trade and market access for Bolivian agricultural products. It is important for Bolivia to balance the needs of its domestic market with the opportunities for growth and development through international trade.

Bolivia's investment promotion law guarantees equal treatment for national and foreign firms but gives priority to public investment

Bolivia is generally open to foreign direct investment (FDI), and its laws guarantee equal treatment for national and foreign firms. However, Bolivia's investment promotion law, enacted in 2014, gives priority to public investment over private investment, both national and foreign. This law, known as Law No. 516 or the "investment promotion law" (Ley de Promoción de Inversiones—LPI), establishes the legal and institutional framework to promote domestic and foreign investment in Bolivia while contributing to socio-economic development.

The LPI consolidates principles, protections, conditions, and incentives regarding domestic and foreign investment. It emphasizes the State's role in conducting social and economic planning, directing the economy, and controlling strategic sectors such as minerals, hydrocarbons, and water and energy sources. The law gives the Bolivian government the exclusive right to develop economic activities in these strategic sectors, with private investors allowed to operate only with rights granted by the State.

The LPI also prioritizes investment that contributes to economic and social development and strengthens economic independence. It requires technology transfers to build the capacity of Bolivian personnel, transfer cutting-edge equipment and machinery, and develop applied research. The law guarantees foreign investors the freedom to transfer profits and capital abroad but subjects these transfers to compliance with tax and other obligations under Bolivian law.

While Bolivia is open to FDI, it has pursued protectionist policies. In 2012, Bolivia abrogated its bilateral investment treaties (BIT) with the United States and several other countries, claiming it was necessary to comply with its 2009 Constitution. Additionally, the Bolivian Constitution gives priority to domestic investment over foreign investment and subjects foreign investment to Bolivian jurisdiction, laws, and authorities. The Constitution also rejects international arbitration as a means to settle disputes with foreign investors in the oil and gas sector.

Bolivia abrogated its bilateral investment treaties with the US and other countries in 2012, reflecting its protectionist stance

Bolivia abrogated its bilateral investment treaties (BITs) with the US and 21 other countries in 2012. This move reflected the country's protectionist stance, prioritising public investment over private and foreign investment. The Bolivian government claimed that the abrogation was necessary to comply with its 2009 Constitution, which grants the state control over natural resources and strategic sectors. The country has pursued a statist economic model, favouring nationalisation and "import substitution".

The termination of these treaties has implications for investors, as it signals Bolivia's protectionist policies and its challenging investment climate. The country's investment climate is characterised by a lack of legal security, corruption allegations, and unclear investment incentives. Bolivia's judicial system is also considered a challenge for investors, with concerns over judicial independence and enforcement of laws related to dispute settlements, intellectual property, and real property.

The US-Bolivia BIT was the first to be terminated by a US treaty partner, impacting the investment protections previously afforded to US companies operating in Bolivia. This abrogation, along with Bolivia's withdrawal from the World Bank's International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) in 2007, highlights the country's shift away from international arbitration forums for dispute resolution.

Despite the abrogation, Bolivia remains open to foreign direct investment (FDI) in certain sectors. However, the investment landscape is complex, with a preference for public and national investment. Foreign investment is monitored by relevant ministries, and the government determines which sectors require private investment.

The termination of the bilateral investment treaties in 2012 underscores Bolivia's protectionist approach to economic policies and its willingness to prioritise domestic control over natural resources and strategic sectors.

Frequently asked questions