Austria's World War I Impact: A Historical Overview

Austria-Hungary was one of the Central Powers in World War I, which began with an Austro-Hungarian declaration of war on the Kingdom of Serbia on 28 July 1914. The war was sparked by the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne, by a Serbian nationalist in Sarajevo. Austria-Hungary, with the support of its powerful ally Germany, presented Serbia with an ultimatum, demanding, among other things, that Austria-Hungary be allowed to conduct its own investigation into the archduke's killing.

Serbia accepted all of Austria's demands except for one, but Austria-Hungary broke off diplomatic relations and began preparing for military invasion. Russia, Serbia's ally, began its own initial steps towards military mobilisation against Austria, and the rest of Europe looked on with trepidation, fearing the imminent outbreak of a Balkans conflict that could explode into a general European war.

On 28 July 1914, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, and in response, Russia ordered mobilisation in the four military districts facing Galicia, its common front with the Austro-Hungarian Empire. That night, Austrian artillery divisions initiated a brief, ineffectual bombardment of Belgrade across the Danube River.

Austria-Hungary's declaration of war on Serbia effectively began the First World War, which would see the major powers in the Western world, with the exception of the United States and Italy, fling themselves headlong into the conflict.

The Austrian parliament was suspended in March 1914 and was not reconvened for three years

The Austrian parliament was suspended in March 1914, and was not reconvened for three years. During this time, Austria was governed by a bureaucratic authoritarian regime. The suspension of the Austrian parliament was a result of the political crisis that the Austrian half of the empire suffered on the eve of World War I.

The suspension of the Austrian parliament was ordered by Minister-President Count Karl Stürgkh, who cultivated a very authoritarian style. Stürgkh's decision to close the parliament was due to political gridlock in Bohemia. The Abgeordnetenhaus consisted of 516 deputies, representing eight different ethnic groupings, divided again into many ideological and social factions. Stürgkh planned on holding the Reichsrat hostage to a settlement of the Bohemian crisis. This made sense given the robust support he enjoyed from the aged Emperor Franz Joseph I, who embraced a passive, reactive governance role.

The suspension of the Austrian parliament was also influenced by the fact that most high-level opinion leaders in Vienna expected that Franz Ferdinand, with his radical plans for constitutional reconstruction, would soon ascend the throne. Stürgkh's methods in the context of March 1914 were logical and plausible, but they quickly proved disastrous in wartime. The assassination of Franz Ferdinand and the decision for a retributive war against Serbia presented Stürgkh with a ready-made excuse to extend his autocracy.

Stürgkh refused to negotiate with parliamentary leaders and ordered the current session of the Reichsrat closed, with its building soon to be converted into a temporary military hospital. Open political gatherings were unilaterally prohibited throughout the monarchy. Unlike the other Great Powers, Austria thus entered the war without formal political representation. Politics now became privatized, involving small groups of conspirators, each attempting to marshal prewar contacts and influence to achieve minor favors from one or another ministry or from the Army High Command (AOK).

In late July, Stürgkh issued emergency decrees restricting the use of jury trials, enabling civil and criminal cases for many crimes to be tried before military tribunals, empowering the army with vast authority, and setting aside fundamental rights such as freedom of assembly and of speech. A cascade of other measures were also announced, such as restricting telephone and telegraphic traffic and prohibiting the importation of certain key materials. The restrictions on jury trials and the transfer of jurisdiction for many criminal delicts to the army applied throughout the Austrian side of the empire. For regions deemed to be protected war zones, the AOK received the further right to issue decrees involving vast areas of domestic policy, to declare martial law if deemed necessary to protect military interests, and to assume total responsibility for all judicial proceedings.

The suspension of the Austrian parliament was also influenced by the fact that the Austrian political system suffered from a severe crisis, with several rapid changes of government at the start of the new century. Between 1871 and 1917, there were twenty heads of government in Austria, compared with only five changes in government in Germany during the same period.

The Hungarian parliament continued its sessions and proved itself less amenable to dictation from the military

The Hungarian parliament's continued sessions proved its resistance to military dictation. The Hungarian prime minister, Count István Tisza, and foreign minister, Count István Burián, had decisive influence over the internal and external affairs of the monarchy. This was demonstrated by a transition of power that occurred after the Hungarian half provided sufficient supplies for the military to continue waging war. By late 1916, food supplies from Hungary became intermittent, and the government sought an armistice with the Entente powers. However, Britain and France no longer had any regard for the integrity of the monarchy due to its support for Germany.

The Hungarian parliament's resistance to military dictation was also reflected in its opposition to expanding the monarchy in the Balkans. Hungarian Prime Minister and political scientist István Tisza opposed this expansion because "the Dual Monarchy already had too many Slavs", which would further threaten the integrity of the Dual Monarchy. In a memorandum to Emperor Franz Joseph, Tisza wrote:

> It is my firm conviction that Germany's two neighbours [Russia and France] are carefully proceeding with military preparations, but will not start the war so long as they have not attained a grouping of the Balkan states against us that confronts the monarchy with an attack from three sides and pins down the majority of our forces on our eastern and southern front.

Tisza's prediction proved correct, as the war with Serbia triggered a general European war, with Russia, France, and eventually Britain joining the conflict.

The Hungarian parliament's resistance to military dictation can also be seen in the context of the multi-ethnic nature of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. The empire included several different ethnic groups, such as Serbs, Poles, Ukrainians, Czechs, and Slovakians. This internal diversity created divisions within the ranks of the army and made it more difficult for commanders to organise and deploy troops effectively. The multi-ethnic nature of the empire also contributed to the political instability that ultimately led to its collapse.

In addition, the Hungarian parliament's resistance to military dictation may have been influenced by the empire's economic situation. While the empire had a small industrial base, its major contributions to the war effort were manpower and food. Hungary, with its heavy agricultural base, was able to provide sufficient food supplies to sustain the military. However, the overall economic conditions in the empire deteriorated rapidly during the war, with food shortages and inflation affecting civilians on the home front.

The Austro-Hungarian army was poorly led and suffered heavy losses

The Austro-Hungarian army played a significant role in World War I, but it was plagued by poor leadership and suffered tremendous losses throughout the conflict. The army's high command, often influenced by political considerations, made several strategic and tactical blunders that led to military setbacks and heavy casualties.

One of the key issues was the army's conservative and rigid strategic thinking. The Austro-Hungarian high command, led by Chief of Staff Conrad von Hötzendorf, favoured offensive strategies and direct confrontations with the enemy. This approach often resulted in costly frontal assaults against well-entrenched enemy positions, particularly against the Russians and Serbs. The Battle of Cer in 1914, one of the first major engagements, ended in a humiliating defeat for the Austro-Hungarians at the hands of the Serbs.

The army's leadership failed to adapt to the realities of modern warfare. They underestimated the importance of machine guns, artillery, and trenches, which characterized the static nature of the war on the Eastern and Balkan fronts. This resulted in ill-conceived attacks that led to massive casualties. The Battle of Galicia in 1914, against the Russians, exemplified this failure, as the Austro-Hungarian forces suffered a significant defeat due to poor coordination and inadequate artillery support.

Additionally, the multi-ethnic nature of the empire presented challenges for the army's leadership. The army consisted of various nationalities, including Hungarians, Czechs, Slovaks, and Croats, who often lacked a sense of unified national identity. This diversity sometimes led to communication problems and divided loyalties within the ranks. The failure to address these issues effectively further contributed to the army's poor performance and high casualty rates.

The consequences of these leadership failures were devastating. The Austro-Hungarian army suffered enormous losses, with hundreds of thousands of soldiers killed, wounded, or taken prisoner. The Battle of Brusilov in 1916, for instance, resulted in over a million casualties for the Austro-Hungarians due to the relentless Russian offensive. The heavy losses strained the empire's resources and contributed to a sense of war weariness among the populace.

The poor leadership and heavy losses had far-reaching consequences for the Austro-Hungarian Empire. They not only weakened the military's effectiveness but also contributed to the empire's internal instability and eventual collapse. The failures of the army's high command fuelled ethnic tensions, encouraged nationalist sentiments, and ultimately played a significant role in shaping the political landscape of Central Europe in the post-war era.

The war led to the breakup of the Empire and the loss of territory for Hungary

The Austro-Hungarian Empire, also known as the Dual Monarchy, was a union of two nations: the Austrian Empire and the Kingdom of Hungary. The two countries shared a monarch, who was titled both Emperor of Austria and King of Hungary. The two countries also shared unified diplomatic and defence policies.

The war led to the breakup of the Empire, which was already effectively dissolved by the time the military authorities signed the armistice of Villa Giusti on 3 November 1918. The Kingdom of Hungary and the First Austrian Republic were treated as its successors de jure. The breakup of the Empire also resulted in the loss of territory for Hungary.

The war had a significant impact on the home front in Hungary. The country struggled economically, facing issues with food supplies and industrial capacity. Inflation was also a concern, with some estimates suggesting it rose by as much as 1000% during the war, destroying people's savings.

Hungary provided the majority of soldiers for the Austro-Hungarian armed forces during the war. Roughly 600,000 Hungarian soldiers were killed in action, and 700,000 were wounded.

By late 1916, food supplies from Hungary became intermittent, and the government sought an armistice with the Entente powers. However, this attempt failed as Britain and France no longer supported the integrity of the monarchy due to its support for Germany.

The Hungarian Parliament voted in favour of terminating the union with Austria on 17 October 1918. Count Mihály Károlyi, the prominent opponent of the continued union with Austria, seized power in the Aster Revolution on 31 October. He was appointed Hungarian Prime Minister by Emperor Charles I, who was all but forced to do so. One of Károlyi's first acts was to formally repudiate the compromise agreement, effectively terminating the personal union with Austria and dissolving the Austro-Hungarian state.

The war caused food shortages and economic collapse

Austria-Hungary's economic woes were exacerbated by the fact that it did not have the industrial base to build the artillery and other war equipment necessary for the conflict. While it did make improvements, the country struggled to maintain its industrial capacity. Inflation was also a concern throughout the war, with some estimates putting inflation at 1000% during the war, effectively destroying people's savings.

The army conquered productive agricultural areas in Romania and elsewhere, but refused to allow food shipments to civilians back home. Morale fell every year, and the diverse nationalities gave up on the empire and looked for ways to establish their own nation states.

Frequently asked questions