
The Austro-Hungarian Army was the largest in Europe when mobilized, expanding to over 800,000 men. However, the army was slow to mobilize and move troops to the scene of battle compared to the Prussians, who made use of their growing rail system. In this text, we will explore how much of their army Austria-Hungary mobilized or moved and the factors that influenced their military strategy.
Characteristics | Values |
---|---|
Number of men in standing army | 240,000 |
Number of men in mobilized army | 800,000 |
Number of men in mobilized army in 1914 | 1.8-2 million |
Percentage of male citizens called up to serve | 25% |
Number of active-duty troops in 1868 | 355,000 |
Percentage of population conscripted in 1900 | 0.29% |
What You'll Learn
- The Austro-Hungarian army's size was tied to ceilings established in 1889
- The standing army consisted of 12 corps with 240,000 men in 1854
- The army could be expanded to 800,000 upon mobilisation
- In 1914, the monarchy could mobilise 1.8-2 million men
- The Austro-Hungarian army was slow to mobilise compared to the Prussians
The Austro-Hungarian army's size was tied to ceilings established in 1889
In 1868, the number of active-duty troops in the Austro-Hungarian army was 355,000, which could be expanded to 800,000 upon mobilization. This was significantly less than the European powers of France, the North German Confederation, and Russia, each of which could field more than one million men.
By 1900, the population of the Austro-Hungarian Empire had risen to nearly 50 million, but the size of the army remained tied to the ceilings established in 1889. As a result, at the start of the 20th century, Austria-Hungary conscripted only 0.29% of its population, which amounted to about 25% of male citizens. In 1914, this allowed the monarchy to mobilize some 1.8-2 million men, compared to Germany's 2.4 million and Russia's 3.4 million.
Despite these numbers, Austria-Hungary found itself trapped in a three-front war for which it had not planned. Presuming that Russia would take much longer to mobilize its forces, the Austro-Hungarian War Command (Armeeoberkommando, or AOK) initially focused on invading Serbia. However, when it became clear that Russia was mobilizing, some units were shifted north to Galicia.
Italy vs Austria-Hungary: Who Suffered More?
You may want to see also
The standing army consisted of 12 corps with 240,000 men in 1854
In 1854, the standing army of Austria-Hungary consisted of 12 corps with 240,000 men. This could be expanded to over 800,000 upon mobilisation, making it the largest army in Europe. However, the speed of mobilisation and the capacity to move troops to the scene of battle was worse than that of the Prussians, who made full use of their growing rail system.
The Austro-Hungarian army was organised by region, which meant that mobilisation required eight weeks, nearly twice as long as the Prussian army. This slow mobilisation was a result of the creation of Austria-Hungary under the Compromise (Ausgleich) of 1867, which separated the Empire into independent Austrian and Hungarian governments.
The Austro-Hungarian army faced further challenges due to the unwillingness of the parliaments to support the military's budgetary demands. This resulted in only about 25% of Austro-Hungarian male citizens being called up to serve, compared to 86% in France, 40% in Germany, and 37% in Russia.
Despite these challenges, the Austro-Hungarian army was able to mobilise some 1.8-2 million men by 1914. However, this was still less than the number of men mobilised by Germany and Russia, who mobilised 2.4 million and 3.4 million men, respectively.
Elisabeth of Austria: A Life and Death Overview
You may want to see also
The army could be expanded to 800,000 upon mobilisation
The Austro-Hungarian Army could be expanded to 800,000 men upon mobilisation. This was the largest army in Europe at the time. However, the speed of mobilisation and the capacity to move troops to the scene of battle was worse than that of the Prussians, who made full use of their growing rail system. The Austro-Hungarian Army also suffered from a lack of support from the parliaments, which resulted in an unfavourable mobilisation rate of only about 25% of Austro-Hungarian male citizens being called up to serve. This was significantly less than the mobilisation rates of other European powers, such as France (86%), Germany (40%), and Russia (37%).
In 1868, the number of active-duty troops in the Austro-Hungarian Army was 355,000. Despite this large standing army, the Austro-Hungarian Empire conscripted only 0.29% of its population at the start of the 20th century. This was due to the size of the army being tied to ceilings established in 1889. By 1914, the monarchy could mobilise some 1.8-2 million men, but this was still less than the mobilisation capabilities of Germany and Russia.
The Austro-Hungarian Army began mobilising for a single-front war on 28 July, but soon found itself trapped in a three-front war for which it had not planned. Presuming that Russia would take much longer to mobilise its forces, the Austro-Hungarian War Command (Armeeoberkommando, or AOK) implemented its Plan B (Balkan) to invade Serbia from three sides. However, when it became obvious that Russia was mobilising, some units were shifted north to Galicia.
Austria's Forest Fire Risks: What You Need to Know
You may want to see also
In 1914, the monarchy could mobilise 1.8-2 million men
In 1914, the Austro-Hungarian monarchy could mobilise 1.8-2 million men. This was significantly less than the European powers of France, Germany and Russia, each of which could field more than 2 million men. The Austro-Hungarian army was also smaller than the population would suggest, with only 0.29% of its population conscripted at the start of the 20th century.
The Austro-Hungarian army's mobilisation was slow compared to the Prussians, who made full use of their growing rail system. The Austro-Hungarian army's policy of assigning conscripts to regiments far from their homes meant that mobilisation required eight weeks, nearly twice as long as the Prussian army, which was organised by region.
Despite this, the Austro-Hungarian army was still a formidable force. When mobilised, it expanded to over 800,000 men, making it the largest army in Europe. However, the army found itself trapped in a three-front war for which it had not planned.
The Austro-Hungarian army's mobilisation was also affected by the unwillingness of the parliaments to support the military's budgetary demands. This resulted in only about 25% of Austro-Hungarian male citizens being called up to serve, compared to much higher rates in other countries.
Austria's UEFA Champions League Contenders: A Comprehensive Overview
You may want to see also
The Austro-Hungarian army was slow to mobilise compared to the Prussians
Despite the slow mobilisation, the Austro-Hungarian army was able to mobilise a significant number of troops. In 1854, the standing army consisted of 240,000 men, which could be expanded to over 800,000 upon mobilisation. In 1914, the monarchy could mobilise some 1.8-2 million men. However, this was still less than the number of troops mobilised by other European powers such as Germany, Russia, and France.
Taxi Services in Vienna, Austria: Availability and Options
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
240,000.
In 1868, the number of active-duty troops in the Austro-Hungarian army was 355,000, but this could be expanded to 800,000 upon mobilisation. In 1914, the monarchy could mobilise some 1.8-2 million men.
In 1868, the Austro-Hungarian army could mobilise significantly fewer men than the European powers of France, the North German Confederation and Russia, each of which could field more than one million men.
Only about 25 per cent, compared to 86 per cent in France, 40 per cent in Germany and 37 per cent in Russia.