Lethal Efficiency: Examining The Bullet-To-Kill Ratio In The Afghanistan Conflict

The US military's use of ammunition in Afghanistan has been a topic of discussion and scrutiny. According to various sources, it is estimated that US forces have fired approximately 250,000 bullets for every insurgent killed in Afghanistan and Iraq. This has led to a significant increase in ammunition usage, with US forces utilizing around 1.8 billion rounds of small-arms ammunition annually. The high rate of ammunition usage has even caused American ammunition manufacturers to struggle to meet the demand, resulting in the US importing ammunition from other countries like Israel.

US forces have used 250,000 bullets for every insurgent killed in Afghanistan

US forces have fired an estimated 250,000 bullets for every insurgent killed in Afghanistan. This has resulted in the US importing ammunition from Israel to keep up with the rate of fire.

The US military is now using 1.8 billion rounds of small-arms ammunition a year, more than double the amount used five years ago. The increase in ammunition usage is largely due to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as changes in military doctrine and increased training.

While the exact number of bullets expended per insurgent killed is difficult to determine, military officials have claimed “great successes” in Iraq based on body counts. Maj-Gen Rick Lynch, the top US military spokesman in Iraq, stated that 1,534 insurgents had been seized or killed in a recent operation in Baghdad. Other estimates suggest that at least 20,000 insurgents have been killed in President George Bush's "war on terror".

John Pike, director of the Washington military research group GlobalSecurity.org, estimated that US forces expended around six billion bullets between 2002 and 2005. He calculated that this equates to around 300,000 bullets per insurgent, rounding this number down to 250,000 to be conservative. Pike also pointed out that many of these bullets are used for training purposes, stating: "What are you training for? To kill insurgents."

The high rate of ammunition usage has highlighted the inability of US ammunition manufacturers to meet current demands. The General Accounting Office (GAO) report notes that the government-owned plants producing small- and medium-calibre ammunition are outdated and unable to meet current munitions needs, despite millions of dollars spent on upgrades. As a result, the US Department of Defense has had to rely on foreign commercial producers to meet its small-calibre ammunition requirements.

The discussion surrounding the number of bullets used per insurgent killed in Afghanistan raises broader questions about the political economy of warfare. It prompts considerations of the true cost of each bullet, factoring in not just the purchase price but also transportation, soldier training, base construction, and other administrative costs. Additionally, it underscores the misallocation of resources, with far more money spent on military operations than on development and reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan.

US forces are using 1.8 billion rounds of small-arms ammunition a year

The US military's use of ammunition has more than doubled in five years, largely due to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as changes in military doctrine and increased training. The former head of US forces in Iraq, General Tommy Franks, claimed that his forces "don't do body counts", making it difficult to estimate how many bullets have been expended for every insurgent killed. However, military officials suggest that at least 20,000 insurgents have been killed in President George W. Bush's "war on terror".

Based on the General Accounting Office (GAO) figures, it is estimated that US forces have used around 250,000 bullets for every insurgent killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. John Pike, director of the Washington military research group GlobalSecurity.org, calculated that US forces expended around six billion bullets between 2002 and 2005. He pointed out that many of these bullets have been used for training purposes, stating: "What are you training for? To kill insurgents."

The GAO report notes that the government-owned plants that produce small- and medium-calibre ammunition are outdated and unable to meet current munitions needs. As a result, the Department of Defense has had to rely on foreign commercial producers to meet its small-calibre ammunition requirements. The Pentagon has contracted with US firms and Israeli manufacturers to help make up the shortfall.

The high rate of ammunition usage by US forces has led to concerns about the cost and effectiveness of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. It also raises questions about the impact of such massive firepower on innocent civilians in densely populated areas.

US ammunition manufacturers cannot keep up with demand

US ammunition manufacturers have been struggling to keep up with demand, with some working around the clock and still unable to meet the nation's demand for ammunition. This issue has been exacerbated by the recent increase in firearms purchases, which has resulted in a backlog of orders for ammunition manufacturers.

Factors Contributing to the Shortage

• Increase in Firearms Purchases: According to an FBI report, background checks for gun purchases increased significantly in 2020 and 2021, surpassing each previous year by over 10 million. This indicates that more people bought guns during those years, leading to a higher demand for ammunition.
• Remington Bankruptcy: Remington, one of the biggest gun and ammo manufacturers in the US, filed for bankruptcy in 2018 and 2020, leading to a loss of investors and revenue. This paused their ammo production and caused a sudden increase in demand for other ammo brands, who struggled to keep up.
• COVID-19 Pandemic Supply Chain Issues: The pandemic disrupted international supply chains, making it difficult for ammo manufacturers to import raw materials and resulting in a 34% drop in ammo imports.
• Ammo Import Restrictions: The US government has implemented sanctions and bans on importing ammunition from certain countries, including Russia, China, Iraq, and others.
• Raw Material Shortages: American ammo manufacturers are facing a shortage of copper, a primary material for making bullets, due to competition from electric car companies and the US Mint.

Impact of the Shortage

The ammo shortage has led to increased prices for consumers, with manufacturers dictating higher prices due to limited supply. It has also resulted in rationing of ammunition, with hunters and gun owners reducing their usage to conserve their limited stock.

Efforts to Address the Shortage

To alleviate the shortage, the US government has contracted additional ammunition producers, including Winchester Ammunition and Israel Military Industries, to meet the high demand. However, this has not been enough to keep up with the increasing demand for ammunition, especially with the ongoing conflicts and training requirements.

A Complex Issue

The issue of ammunition shortage in the US is complex and multifaceted, involving various factors such as increased firearms purchases, manufacturing challenges, supply chain disruptions, and raw material shortages. While efforts have been made to address the shortage, it persists and is expected to continue into the future, especially if the demand for guns remains high.

The US has had to import ammunition from Israel

The US military's ammunition usage has been extremely high, with an estimated 250,000 bullets fired for every insurgent killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. This has resulted in American ammunition manufacturers struggling to keep up with the demand. Consequently, the US has had to import ammunition from Israel to maintain its rate of fire.

The US forces' high ammunition expenditure is attributed to various factors, including increased weapons training requirements and the need for a more self-sustaining and lethal force following the September 11, 2001, attacks. The total usage has more than doubled in five years, amounting to 1.8 billion rounds of small-arms ammunition annually. This surge in ammunition usage has led to a situation where US ammunition manufacturers cannot meet the military's demands.

To address this shortfall, the US government has turned to foreign commercial producers to meet its small-caliber ammunition needs. Among these foreign suppliers is Israel Military Industries, an Israeli ammunition manufacturer closely associated with the Israeli government. Israel Military Industries produces a significant proportion of weapons and ordnance for the Israeli Defense Force.

The decision to import ammunition from Israel has been controversial. During a congressional hearing, Representative Neil Abercrombie expressed dismay at the idea of contracting with an Israeli firm to provide ammunition for use against Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan. Despite the controversy, the US Department of Defense proceeded with the purchase, acquiring 313 million rounds of 5.56mm, 7.62mm, and 50-caliber ammunition.

The US military's heavy reliance on ammunition has led to significant financial costs. The cost of each bullet, when factoring in transportation, soldier training, and other related expenses, far exceeds the price of the bullet itself. This has resulted in a situation where the cost of killing a single insurgent with 250,000 bullets is estimated to be at least $82,500, and possibly much higher depending on various factors.

The cost of killing one Talib fighter is at least $82,500

The high cost of killing insurgents is due in part to the sheer volume of ammunition used by US forces. Between 2002 and 2005, US forces expended around six billion bullets, according to military researcher John Pike. This works out to around 300,000 bullets per insurgent killed, or about 10 shots for every man, woman, and child in Iraq at the time. The high rate of fire has led to ammunition shortages, with American manufacturers struggling to keep up with demand. As a result, the US has been forced to import ammunition from Israel.

The cost of killing insurgents is not just financial but also human. Innocent civilians, including women and children, have been killed in checkpoint foul-ups and exchanges of gunfire in urban settings. Additionally, the massive firepower and densely inhabited neighbourhoods have created an unsafe environment for those living in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The political economy of the bullet in Afghanistan is complex and multifaceted. The US military budget for Afghanistan exceeds $70 billion annually, with an additional $4-6 billion allocated for development. However, the number of Taliban killed by US forces is relatively low, with battalions averaging one arrest every two months and infrequent solid contact with the enemy. The high cost of killing insurgents highlights the inefficiency and wastefulness of the US military's approach to warfare.

Frequently asked questions