The Complex Legacy Of The War In Afghanistan: Evaluating Safety And Stability

The war in Afghanistan was initially started to get those who attacked the United States on September 11, 2001, and to ensure that Al-Qaeda could not use Afghanistan as a base to attack the United States again. The war was also meant to degrade Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and to hunt down Osama Bin Laden. The war in Afghanistan was not meant to be about nation-building or creating a unified, centralised democracy.

The war in Afghanistan was meant to prevent a terrorist attack on American homeland. The United States wanted to ensure that Afghanistan did not become a terrorist safe haven. The war was also meant to support the Afghan people through diplomacy, international influence, and humanitarian aid.

The war in Afghanistan is not a war of necessity but a war of choice

The war in Afghanistan has evolved from a war of necessity into a war of choice. The interests of the U.S. in Afghanistan have become less than vital with the near elimination of al-Qaeda in Afghanistan. Afghanistan no longer represents a significant global terrorist threat and certainly no more than several other countries in the region.

The U.S. has other viable policy options available. A more narrow and limited counterterrorism strategy coupled with a limited degree of nation- or capacity-building is possible. The situation in Afghanistan does not warrant the U.S. becoming a protagonist in its civil war, the adoption of a counterinsurgency strategy, or the tripling of U.S. force levels.

Afghanistan is not a major terrorist haven. It should not be assumed that it will become one even if the Taliban make inroads. It was an error to equate Taliban return with al-Qaeda's return. If there is some renewed terrorist presence and activity in Afghanistan, the U.S. can respond to it much as it does in other countries, such as Yemen and Somalia.

The U.S. troop presence in Afghanistan is absorbing more economic, military, human, diplomatic, and political resources than it warrants. The $120 billion annual price tag is unjustifiable given the budget crisis faced by the U.S. and the need for air and naval modernization. The history of the 21st century is far more likely to be determined in the land areas and waters of Asia and the Pacific than on the plains and mountains of Afghanistan.

The U.S. needs to be better prepared for future counterterrorist interventions elsewhere in the greater Middle East and Africa. The U.S. should also make sure that it has adequate forces for dealing with possible contingencies on the Korean Peninsula and possibly Iran. Afghanistan is a strategic distraction, pure and simple.

This is not an argument for complete withdrawal but for doing considerably less. The U.S. should transition rapidly to a relatively small, sustainable, strategically warranted deployment. This future troop presence should allow for continued counterterrorist operations and for some training of Afghan forces at both the national and local levels.

Reductions of the scale advocated here and the phasing out of combat operations against the Taliban have a number of advantages. It would save upward of $75 billion a year and sharply reduce American casualties. Continuing what the U.S. is doing, on the scale it is doing, will not necessarily achieve more than what is being suggested here given Afghanistan's history, leadership, demography, culture, geography, and neighborhood. Even if substantial progress could be achieved in the near term, there is nothing to suggest that the gains would endure.

Strategy is about balancing means and ends, resources and interests. The time has come to restore a strategic perspective to what the U.S. does in Afghanistan.

The war in Afghanistan is not a war against terrorism but a civil war

The War in Afghanistan, which lasted from 2001 to 2021, was a response to the September 11 attacks. It was framed as a war on terror, with the aim of toppling the Taliban-ruled Islamic Emirate and capturing Osama bin Laden. However, the notion that this was a war against terrorism is misleading. In reality, Afghanistan has been plagued by civil war and conflict since the Soviet-Afghan alliance ended in 1989, with the Soviet Union continuing to financially support the Afghan government in its fight against the mujahideen, who were backed by the US, UK, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, China, and Iran, among others.

Following the Soviet withdrawal, Afghanistan descended into a civil war that lasted from 1989 to 1992, with the mujahideen establishing the Islamic State of Afghanistan (ISA). This was followed by another phase of the civil war from 1992 to 1996, during which various mujahideen groups fought against the ISA, with the Taliban and al-Qaeda eventually seizing control of Kabul and most of the country, establishing the first Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (IEA). The second Afghan Civil War lasted from 1996 to 2001 and was a continuation of the conflict between militias loyal to either the ISA or the Taliban-ruled IEA.

The US-led invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, while triggered by the 9/11 attacks, was not solely a counterterrorism operation. It was also about projecting military power, maintaining a presence in the region, and assisting local security forces to prevent future attacks on the US. The Taliban provided sanctuary to al-Qaeda, but the conflict in Afghanistan is deeply rooted in the country's history of civil strife and foreign intervention.

While the presence of US troops in Afghanistan was justified as a means to keep their country safe, the reality is more nuanced. The US mission was not to "fight wars" but to assist local forces, conduct counterterrorism operations, and prevent attacks on the US from originating in Afghanistan. The decision to withdraw US troops does not indicate a retreat or a surrender but a strategic choice to prioritize national interests and the safety of US citizens.

The war in Afghanistan is not a war against the Taliban but a war against al-Qaeda

The war in Afghanistan was initially a war against the Taliban, who were providing a safe haven for al-Qaeda. However, the Taliban and al-Qaeda are separate entities with different goals and ideologies. The Taliban is an Islamic fundamentalist group predominantly composed of Pashtuns, while al-Qaeda is a transnational terrorist group with a decentralised and localised presence.

The Taliban and al-Qaeda have a complex and dynamic partnership. The Taliban has never broken ties with al-Qaeda, despite significant pressure to do so. The Taliban's relationship with al-Qaeda offers meaningful benefits as they navigate the complex political environment in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

The United States' war in Afghanistan has evolved from a war of necessity into a war of choice. The United States' interests in Afghanistan have become less vital with the near elimination of al-Qaeda in the country. Afghanistan no longer represents a significant global terrorist threat, and it should not be assumed that it will become one even if the Taliban make inroads.

The war in Afghanistan is not solely a war against the Taliban but a war against al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups that threaten the United States and its allies.

The war in Afghanistan is not a war for democracy but a war for stability

The war in Afghanistan was not a war for democracy but a war for stability. The war in Afghanistan was a direct response to the September11 attacks. The invasion of Afghanistan was led by the United States and aimed to topple the Taliban regime and establish the Islamic Republic. The Taliban and its allies were expelled from major population centers by US-led forces, supporting the anti-Taliban Northern Alliance. The conflict officially ended with the 2021 Taliban offensive, which overthrew the Islamic Republic, and re-established the Islamic Emirate.

The war in Afghanistan was a war for stability because the invasion of Afghanistan was led by the United States and aimed to topple the Taliban regime and establish the Islamic Republic. The Taliban and its allies were expelled from major population centers by US-led forces, supporting the anti-Taliban Northern Alliance. The conflict officially ended with the 2021 Taliban offensive, which overthrew the Islamic Republic, and re-established the Islamic Emirate.

The war in Afghanistan is not a war for women's rights but a war for human rights

The war in Afghanistan was initially fought to prevent the country from becoming a safe haven for terrorist groups like al-Qaeda. However, the war has also been framed as a war for women's rights, with the Taliban's oppressive treatment of women being used as a justification for the conflict. While the Taliban's rule has indeed been devastating for women's rights, the war has not been successful in improving the situation for women in Afghanistan.

Since the Taliban took power in August 2021, they have imposed policies severely restricting the rights of women and girls. Women have been banned from most forms of employment and prohibited from attending secondary school and university. The Taliban have also carried out broad censorship and have detained and tortured journalists and activists.

The war has not improved the situation for women in Afghanistan. Women's rights activists report that there have been detentions, child marriages, forced marriages, and rapes. Women are barred from traveling more than 70 kilometres without a close male relative and mandated to wear face coverings in public in a way that reveals only their eyes. They are not allowed to work in most sectors outside of health and education.

The war in Afghanistan has not been a war for women's rights but a war for human rights. The conflict has resulted in severe human rights violations for people in Afghanistan, with all Afghans suffering extreme repression and human rights violations. The war has caused a devastating humanitarian crisis, with the World Food Programme reporting that two-thirds of the population are dependent on humanitarian assistance – almost three times as many as in 2021.

Frequently asked questions