Austria Vs Australia: A Size Comparison

Australia is around 9,130% larger than Austria, but Austria has a higher life expectancy at birth. Australia's population is around 17.2 million more than Austria's, and the two countries also differ in their per capita public and private health expenditures.

Australia is 9,130% larger than Austria

The population of Australia is ~26.1 million people, while 17.2 million fewer people live in Austria, which has a population of ~8.9 million people.

In terms of health, per capita public and private health expenditures combined in Austria are $5,407.50 USD while Australia spends $6,140.00 USD. The life expectancy at birth in Austria is 80.17 while in Australia it is 82.07.

Australia's population is 17.2 million more than Austria's

Australia is approximately 7,741,220 sq km, while Austria is approximately 83,871 sq km, making Australia 9,130% larger than Austria.

In terms of population, Australia's population is 17.2 million more than Austria's. As of 2025, Australia's population is 26,892,408, while Austria's population is 9,115,773. Australia's population has been increasing, with 25.7 million people recorded in 2021, 26 million in 2022, and 27,204,809 in 2024. In contrast, Austria's population is growing almost exclusively through immigration, with 8.9 million people recorded in 2021 and 9.1 million in 2025.

The population density in Australia is 4 per km2 (9 people per sq. mile), while in Austria, it is 111 per km2 (286 people per sq. mile). This means that despite having a much larger land area, Australia has a lower population density than Austria.

The median age in Australia is 38.3 years, while in Austria, it is 43.6 years. Australia's population is also younger, with 14.4% of the population being preschool and compulsory school-age children, compared to 19.2% of elderly people in retirement age in Austria.

Australia spends more on health than Austria

Australia is approximately 7,741,220 sq km, while Austria is approximately 83,871 sq km, making Australia 9,130% larger than Austria. However, Australia spends more per capita on health than Austria. According to the World Health Organization, per capita public and private health expenditures combined in Austria are $5,407.50 USD while Australia spends $6,140.00 USD. This figure combines government, personal, and employer spending on healthcare.

In Australia, just over 9% of the country's GDP was spent on health throughout the 2010s, while most comparable countries were spending between 10% and 12%. In 2020, Australia spent the equivalent of US$5,802 per capita on health. In Austria, health expenditure amounted to 10.4% of GDP in 2019, or US$6,134, the fifth highest in the EU. Spending on health from public sources accounted for 75% of the total, which is below the EU average of 80%. In contrast, out-of-pocket spending accounted for nearly 18%, which is above the EU average of 15%.

Health systems that rely on funding via private insurance are less accessible, less efficient, and less equitable, and generally have worse health outcomes. Market-based healthcare doesn't deliver the expected benefits of markets but does generate the expected downsides. In countries with social insurance, such as Germany and the Netherlands, the provision of care is predominantly from non-government providers, rather than government-run hospitals. However, research has shown there are higher cost pressures in social insurance systems because they are costlier to administer than tax-based systems.

Comparing health system performance internationally is complicated, though, as each country has unique political, economic, and social conditions. Because health spending and health outcomes are often correlated with a country’s wealth, this makes it difficult to draw direct comparisons between Australia and Austria.

Australia's life expectancy is higher than Austria's

Australia is approximately 7,741,220 sq km, while Austria is approximately 83,871 sq km, making Australia over 9,000% larger than Austria. Australia also has a much larger population, with 17.2 million more people living there.

Despite their differences in size, Australia and Austria have relatively similar life expectancies. In 2023, the life expectancy in Austria was 81.6 years, with women expected to live to 84 years and men to 79.2 years. In Australia, the life expectancy is 82.07 years. This is a difference of 1.47 years.

There are several factors that could contribute to Australia's slightly higher life expectancy. One factor could be the difference in per capita health expenditures. In Austria, the per capita public and private health expenditure is $5,407.50 USD, while in Australia, it is $6,140.00 USD. This indicates that Australia may have better access to healthcare and health resources, which could contribute to a higher life expectancy.

Another factor could be the difference in population density. Australia has a much lower population density than Austria, with only 3.4 people per square kilometre compared to Austria's 105.7 people per square kilometre. This could result in better access to resources and a lower risk of communicable diseases, which could positively impact life expectancy.

Additionally, Australia's geography and climate may also play a role. Australia's warm and sunny climate could encourage a more active and outdoor lifestyle, which has been linked to improved health and longevity. Furthermore, Australia's geography, with its vast open spaces and coastline, could provide better access to fresh air and clean environments, which have been shown to have positive impacts on health and life expectancy.

Australia is 7,741,220 sq km

This is a huge difference in size, and it's worth noting that the population of Australia is also much larger than that of Austria. Australia has a population of around 26.1 million people, while Austria has a population of approximately 8.9 million people. That's 17.2 million fewer people in Austria.

When comparing the sizes of countries, it's important to consider the projection being used. In this case, the Mercator projection was used, which distorts the size of regions near the poles. This means that the size difference between Australia and Austria may appear more exaggerated than it actually is.

Despite the significant size difference, both Australia and Austria have their own unique geographical features and landscapes. Australia is known for its vast deserts, tropical rainforests, and diverse wildlife, while Austria boasts beautiful mountains, lakes, and valleys. Each country has its own distinct culture and history, which are influenced by their respective sizes and locations.

Frequently asked questions