Us Military Presence In Afghanistan: The Complexities Of Peacekeeping

The United States has been involved in Afghanistan since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, with the goal of ensuring the country would not become a safe haven for international terrorists. While the US has participated in peacekeeping efforts in the country, their role has primarily been to destroy Al-Qaeda and overthrow the Taliban regime.

In the early 2000s, the US ran two of four Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs) deployed in Afghan cities, providing security for international aid groups and playing a limited role in reconstruction. However, they have been reluctant to commit troops to an international peacekeeping force, with the administration opposing the use of US troops for this purpose. This reluctance could reduce sympathy and public support for the US and give credence to critics who claim that the US is a high-tech bully.

The US has instead focused on training and advising Afghan security forces and institutions, with the goal of creating sustainable peace and allowing the Afghan government to exercise its authority throughout the country. This has included the Resolute Support Mission (RSM), which aimed to train, advise, and assist Afghan security forces in fighting terrorism.

While the US has played a significant role in Afghanistan, their presence has also been a motivating factor for terrorist attacks and has contributed to the complexity of the security environment. As such, there are ongoing debates about the level of resources and the type of support the US should provide.

The US's reluctance to commit troops to an international peacekeeping force in Afghanistan

Another reason for the US's reluctance is the potential for a military presence in Afghanistan to motivate terrorists to launch attacks against the US. This was the case with Osama Bin Laden, whose primary reason for attacking America was the presence of US troops in Saudi Arabia.

The US also recognises that a peacekeeping force would require a significant number of troops, and that it would need to be a sustained effort. The US is concerned that it does not have the resources to commit to this, especially given its other military commitments.

Finally, the US is reluctant to commit troops because it does not want to be seen as a high-tech bully, more interested in destruction than reconstruction.

The US's objectives in Afghanistan

Over time, the US's objectives expanded to include broader aims of promoting stability in the region and preventing a humanitarian catastrophe. This involved strengthening democratic processes, improving governance, and promoting human rights in Afghanistan.

As the war dragged on and a military victory became increasingly unlikely, the US shifted its focus from winning to not losing the war. This involved pursuing a political settlement with the Taliban and transitioning to a more limited counterterrorism engagement in the country.

Throughout the conflict, the US also had to manage complex regional dynamics, particularly the role of Pakistan in providing sanctuary to the Taliban. The US sought to pressure Pakistan to crack down on the Taliban while also relying on them for connectivity to Afghanistan.

Dismantling al-Qaeda and Toppling the Taliban Regime:

The initial invasion of Afghanistan following the 9/11 attacks was aimed at dismantling al-Qaeda and removing the Taliban from power. The Taliban had provided a safe haven for al-Qaeda and refused to extradite Osama bin Laden, who was responsible for the attacks.

Preventing Future Attacks:

A key objective throughout the US's involvement in Afghanistan was to prevent Afghanistan from being used as a base for future terrorist attacks on the US and its allies. This involved disrupting and degrading al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups operating in the country.

Promoting Stability and Preventing a Humanitarian Catastrophe:

As the war progressed, the US's objectives expanded beyond counterterrorism to include broader aims of promoting stability in Afghanistan and the region. This involved strengthening the central government, improving governance, and promoting political pluralism and human rights in Afghanistan. The US also sought to manage the complex regional dynamics involving Pakistan, India, and other neighboring countries to prevent a wider conflict.

Pursuing a Political Settlement:

As a military victory became increasingly unlikely, the US shifted its focus to pursuing a political settlement with the Taliban. This involved engaging in direct talks with the Taliban and pressuring them to reduce violence and either reconcile, de-escalate, defect, or declare neutrality. The US also worked to empower the Afghan government and create the conditions for an inclusive and sustainable peace.

Limited Counterterrorism Engagement:

The US also sought to transition to a more limited counterterrorism engagement in Afghanistan, leaving behind a modest military contingent to target terrorist groups while reducing its broader military, economic, and diplomatic investments in the country.

The US's presence in Muslim countries as a motivating factor for terrorist attacks

The United States' presence in Muslim countries is a highly controversial topic, with many arguing that it is a motivating factor for terrorist attacks. While the US has been heavily involved in the Muslim world for many years, its presence has been met with increasing resentment and opposition.

One of the main concerns surrounding the US presence in Muslim countries is the perception that America acts unilaterally in international affairs and does not respect the local cultures and religions. The US military presence in the Middle East, its policies perceived as anti-Arab and anti-Muslim, and its support of Israel have all contributed to grievances felt throughout the Muslim world. These grievances have been exploited by terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda and the Taliban, who seek to portray the US as the "head of the snake" that must be destroyed.

Polls conducted in 2002 and 2003 revealed the extent of anti-American sentiment in Muslim countries. In Egypt, a major recipient of US aid, only 15% of the population had a favorable opinion of the US. In Saudi Arabia, the number was even lower at 12%. Additionally, a significant portion of those surveyed in countries like Indonesia and Turkey feared that the US may attack them, highlighting the deep mistrust and perception of America as a threat.

The US involvement in Afghanistan is a specific example where its presence has been a motivating factor for terrorist attacks. The US initially went to war in Afghanistan to destroy Al-Qaeda and overthrow the Taliban regime, but its continued presence has led to increasing attacks by Taliban gunmen. While there are US-led coalition troops in Afghanistan hunting down terrorists, they are not directly involved in peacekeeping efforts. The reluctance of the US to commit troops to an international peacekeeping force in Afghanistan further underscores the complexity of its involvement in the region.

It is important to note that terrorism is driven by a multitude of factors, including local political, social, and religious influences. However, the US presence in Muslim countries has often been exploited by terrorist groups to gain support and legitimize their cause. As such, the US must carefully consider its role and engagement in these regions to address the underlying grievances and reduce the risk of terrorist attacks.

The US's role in the creation of Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs)

The US played a key role in the creation of Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs) in Afghanistan. PRTs were first established in Afghanistan in early 2002, with a program called Coalition Humanitarian Liaison Cells. These cells were made up of five to ten Army Civil Affairs Officers who were stationed in the provinces of Afghanistan where Coalition Forces were present. Their mission was to assess humanitarian needs and implement small-scale reconstruction projects as an extension of security and stability operations.

By the end of 2002, these cells had evolved to include security forces and representatives of the US government. At that point, they were renamed Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs). The US defined the PRT mission as providing security through development and reconstruction and extending the reach and influence of both the Coalition Forces and the Afghan government.

PRTs were designed as small, joint civilian-military units that supported local leaders and empowered provincial authorities by working closely with the communities they served. They were led by a military officer, generally a Lieutenant Colonel, and included civilian police advisors, and civilian representatives of the US government. The civilian staff included specialists from the State Department, the US Agency for International Development, the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Justice, and other civilian agencies.

The overall PRT concept in Afghanistan was to use relatively small joint civil-military units to achieve three objectives: improve security, extend the authority of the Afghan central government, and facilitate reconstruction.

PRTs ceased operations by 2013 and are no longer operative in Afghanistan.

The US's support for future peacekeeping missions

The US has been a key supporter of peacekeeping missions in Afghanistan and other countries. It has been the largest financial contributor to UN peacekeeping operations and has also been the largest provider of peacekeeping capacity-building support.

The US has invested over $1.5 billion since 2005 in security assistance, specifically focused on delivering tools and training to partner nations. This assistance is primarily delivered through two key programs: the Global Peace Operations Initiative (GPOI) and the International Police Peacekeeping Operations Support Program (IPPOS).

The US has also been an active participant in the UN-sanctioned International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), which aimed to support and protect the transitional Afghan government. While the US has shown reluctance to commit troops to international peacekeeping forces in Afghanistan, it has provided vital financial and personnel contributions to UN peacekeeping operations.

The US has also been an active member of NATO, which has had military forces deployed in Afghanistan under a UN Security Council mandate. NATO's involvement in Afghanistan has been crucial in ensuring the country does not become a safe haven for international terrorists.

Looking forward, the US can continue to play a crucial role in supporting future peacekeeping missions by:

• Providing financial and personnel contributions: The US can continue to invest in security assistance and capacity-building initiatives, such as the GPOI and IPPOS programs.
• Sharing expertise and resources: The US has a wealth of knowledge and resources that can be leveraged to support peacekeeping missions, including military, police, and contracted subject matter experts.
• Collaborating with international partners: The US has a strong partnership with the Netherlands, India, Italy, and the UK to support peacekeeping capacity-building activities. By collaborating with these and other like-minded partners, the US can maximize its impact on peacekeeping efforts worldwide.
• Advocating for greater transparency and accountability: The US can use its influence to advocate for greater transparency, accountability, and effectiveness in UN peacekeeping operations, ensuring that the local communities benefiting from these operations are protected and supported.
• Supporting the development of critical mission capabilities: The US can assist partner countries in developing critical mission capabilities, such as aviation, intelligence, and explosive ordnance disposal, which are vital for bolstering mission capacity and protecting civilians.
• Enhancing environmental sustainability: The US has committed to investing in cleaner and greener UN peacekeeping initiatives, such as transitioning from traditional diesel generators to solar power generation.

Frequently asked questions