Bolivian Forest Destruction: Economic Gain Or Environmental Loss?

Bolivia is cutting down its forests due to a combination of political, economic, and agricultural factors. The Bolivian government encourages deforestation to expand soy plantations and cattle ranching, meeting export demands and contributing to economic development. This has resulted in Bolivia having the world's third-highest deforestation rate, with almost 596,000 hectares of forest lost in 2022 alone. The eastern department of Santa Cruz, home to the Chiquitano dry forest, has been the centre of this deforestation, with fires and illegal logging contributing to the loss of unique ecosystems and biodiversity.

The Bolivian government encourages deforestation

Deforestation in Bolivia has reached a critical point, with the country losing almost 596,000 hectares of forest in 2022 alone. The Bolivian government has been actively encouraging deforestation, implementing policies and legislation that facilitate the clearing of land. This can be seen through several measures taken by the administration.

Firstly, the government has prioritised economic development, particularly in the agricultural sector, over environmental protection. This focus on economic growth has led to the expansion of soy plantations and cattle ranching, which are the leading drivers of deforestation in the country. The government has increased soy export quotas and changed land assignments to allow for agricultural activities, even in protected natural reserves and indigenous communities' areas. This shift in land use has resulted in the clearing of vast areas of forest to make way for soy cultivation and cattle grazing.

Secondly, the Bolivian government has actively granted permits for deforestation and has even approved retrospective clearance of land that was illegally deforested. This indicates a lack of enforcement and consequence for illegal logging activities. The fines for illegal deforestation are also negligible, further discouraging compliance with environmental laws.

Additionally, the government has created the Bolivia Agricultural Production Company (EBPA) through Supreme Decree 4701. While the stated aim of this law is to strengthen food security and enhance the economy, it also allows the EBPA to utilise public lands and market its products internationally. This move appears to be more about growing the economy through exports rather than ensuring domestic food security.

Furthermore, the government has promoted the expansion of biodiesel production, including palm oil, through the establishment of the Bolivian Ecological Oil Industry Productive Public Company (IBAE). This initiative will facilitate the construction of processing plants across the country, leading to the clearing of Amazon Forest areas and threatening the rich biodiversity within these forests.

Lastly, the government's development agenda, outlined in the Patriotic Agenda 2025, notably lacks concrete plans to safeguard the environment and protect the country's forests. The agenda focuses on socio-economic development goals without addressing the environmental impact of these pursuits. This indicates a continued prioritisation of economic growth over environmental conservation.

The Bolivian government's encouragement of deforestation has had severe consequences, including the loss of biodiversity, soil degradation, water shortages, and contamination of water sources. These issues have negatively impacted indigenous communities, who rely on the forest as a key survival resource. As a result, Bolivia is facing increasing pressure to address its deforestation crisis and take meaningful action to protect its remaining forests.

The agricultural industry is the leading driver of deforestation

Bolivia has been experiencing a rapid loss of its forests, with the country losing 8.6 million hectares of forest cover from 1976 to 2021, which is equivalent to 14% of its forests. This has resulted in Bolivia having the third-highest deforestation rate in the world, after Brazil and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The main driving force behind this forest loss is the agricultural industry, specifically the proliferation of surfaces for cattle ranching and soy production.

Cattle Ranching and Soy Production

Bolivia's forests are being cleared to create more space for cattle ranching and soy production. About 80% of Bolivian cattle are raised for domestic consumption, while the rest is exported, particularly to China. Similarly, most of the soy produced in Bolivia is consumed domestically, with Colombia and Peru being its largest export markets. The demand for cattle and soy products has led to the conversion of forest land into farming land and pastures.

Government Policies and Incentives

The Bolivian government's policies and incentives have also encouraged deforestation. During his term, former President Evo Morales made the decision to shift the country's economic focus from oil and natural gas exports to agriculture. This led to an increase in permits for deforestation and a surge in illegal deforestation. Additionally, the government has passed laws that favour industrial agriculture, such as legalising illegal deforestation before 2011 and allowing the cutting down of trees in protected natural reserves and indigenous communities' territories.

Foreign and Domestic Investment

Foreign and domestic investors have contributed to deforestation in Bolivia by setting up large-scale farming operations, particularly for soybean cultivation. These operations clear broad areas of land and build roads deep into forested areas, leaving behind rectangular deforestation patterns. The expansion of soybean farming has been driven by the demand for livestock feed and the favourable regulatory framework created by the government.

Land Speculation and Low Productivity

Land speculation is another factor driving deforestation in Bolivia. Clearing land is used as a way to secure land tenure, and the low productivity of the soy sector in the country means that more land is needed to produce soy. The Bolivian government has also granted a increasing number of permits for land to be deforested for soy production and has approved deforestation that occurred without a permit.

The expansion of soy plantations

Bolivia is the world's tenth-largest producer and exporter of soy, accounting for 0.9% of global production. In 2021, the country produced about 3.3 million tonnes of soy, of which 2.5 million tonnes were exported, mainly to Colombia and Peru. This made soy Bolivia's fourth-largest export, generating an annual revenue of about $1.3 billion.

The Bolivian government's policies actively encourage deforestation for agricultural expansion, including soy production. The government has increased soy export quotas and changed land assignments to allow agriculture in certain forest areas. Additionally, the government has granted a growing number of permits for deforestation for soy production and has even approved deforestation that occurred without a permit.

The intensity of deforestation linked to soy expansion in Bolivia is much higher than in other South American countries. In 2021, 31.8 hectares of native vegetation were cleared for every thousand tonnes of soy produced in Bolivia. This is five times more than in Paraguay, seven times more than in Brazil, and 30 times more than in Argentina.

The municipalities in Bolivia with the most soy-related deforestation in 2021 were San Jose de Chiquitos, Pailon, San Ignacio de Velasco, Cuatro Canãdas, San Julian, El Puente, and San Miguel de Velasco. These seven municipalities accounted for 95% of soy-related deforestation in the country.

The Bolivian government's focus on economic development and the lack of pressure from consumers demanding deforestation-free products make it unlikely that action will be taken to curb soy-related deforestation in the short term. However, without intervention, Bolivia could lose another 10% of its forests by 2035.

The lack of pressure from consumers demanding deforestation-free products

Bolivia has experienced a significant increase in deforestation rates, with a 259% rise over the last eight years. In 2022, the country lost almost 596,000 hectares of forest, making it the third-highest rate of primary forest loss globally, after Brazil and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The eastern department of Santa Cruz, home to the Chiquitano dry forest, has been the centre of this deforestation, with almost three-quarters of recent forest loss occurring in this region.

The Bolivian government's policies have actively encouraged deforestation by creating favourable conditions for agricultural expansion, particularly soy plantations, and cattle ranching. For instance, the government has increased soy export quotas and changed land assignments to allow agriculture in certain forest areas. Additionally, the government has granted numerous permits for deforestation and has even approved deforestation that occurred without a permit.

The lack of consumer pressure for deforestation-free products has allowed the Bolivian government to continue these policies with little resistance. The government's focus on economic development and the expansion of soy plantations to meet export demands have taken precedence over environmental concerns.

Furthermore, the low productivity of the soy sector in Bolivia compared to other countries means that more land is needed to produce soy. This has resulted in land speculation and clearing, with individuals and companies securing land tenure by cutting down forests. The availability of loans from Bolivian banks to finance soy production expansion has further exacerbated the problem.

The absence of significant supply chain pressure on Bolivian soy producers, especially from the EU's deforestation regulations, has also contributed to the lack of incentive to adopt more sustainable practices. Most Bolivian soy is consumed domestically or exported to Colombia and Peru, rather than the EU.

To address this issue, consumers need to demand deforestation-free products and hold the Bolivian government and companies accountable for their actions. Without this pressure, the prospects for meaningful action to end deforestation and transition to sustainable agriculture remain remote.

The government's focus on economic development

The Bolivian government's focus on economic development has been a key driver of deforestation in the country. While the government has expressed commitment to addressing food insecurity and boosting the economy, its policies have largely centred on the expansion of agriculture and extractive industries, which has resulted in the rapid loss of forest cover.

During his first term, former President Evo Morales made significant strides in recognising the rights of indigenous communities and protecting the environment. However, a pivotal shift occurred in 2015 when the Morales administration abandoned an economic model based on oil and natural gas exports and instead prioritised agriculture and livestock. This change in focus necessitated the acquisition of land previously occupied by forests and indigenous territories. As a result, deforestation rates soared, with the government actively encouraging deforestation through various legislative decisions and fund allocations.

The current administration, under President Luis Arce, has continued this trajectory. Despite facing criticism for his poor environmental record, President Arce has promoted the unbridled growth of an extractive economy, falling short on commitments to the Rights of Mother Earth Law, and refusing to embrace deforestation targets. The creation of the Bolivia Agricultural Production Company (EBPA) through Supreme Decree 4701 is a case in point. While the stated aim of this law is to bolster domestic food security and enhance the economy, it also enables the utilisation of public lands by EBPA and promotes the marketing of products in international markets. This move appears to favour economic growth over environmental protection, as evidenced by the continued expansion of soy plantations and cattle ranching.

Additionally, the Arce administration has demonstrated a commitment to expanding biodiesel production, including palm oil. The establishment of the Bolivian Ecological Oil Industry Productive Public Company (IBAE) through Supreme Decree 4786 will facilitate the construction of processing plants across the country. This expansion will undoubtedly lead to further deforestation, as vast areas of Amazonian forest will be cleared to make way for oil palm plantations.

The Bolivian government's emphasis on economic development has also been reflected in its response to illegal deforestation. Illegal logging and unauthorised land clearances for agricultural purposes have been rampant, with minimal repercussions. Fines for illegal logging were reduced by 20% in 2020, sending a weak message of deterrence. Moreover, the government has even legalised some instances of illegal deforestation, further signalling its prioritisation of economic pursuits over environmental conservation.

In conclusion, the Bolivian government's focus on economic development has been a critical factor in the country's escalating deforestation crisis. While addressing economic concerns is essential, the current approach of promoting extractive industries and agriculture without sufficient environmental safeguards is jeopardising Bolivia's forests and the rich biodiversity they harbour.

Frequently asked questions