Poverty In Belarus: Examining The Country's Rate

Belarus has made significant progress in reducing poverty over the past two decades. In the 1990s, the country was one of the poorest in Europe, with around 50% of its population living below the poverty line. However, by 2020, the poverty rate had dropped to 4.8%, and the country had achieved the fastest poverty reduction in the Europe and Central Asia region. This progress is a result of various factors, including favourable energy pricing from Russia and strong economic growth in its trading partners, which boosted Belarus's manufacturing and agricultural sectors. Despite these achievements, challenges remain, including income inequality, unemployment, and the need for new economic policies to sustain future improvements in living standards.

Poverty rate at $1.90 a day

Belarus has made significant progress in reducing poverty, with the poverty headcount ratio falling from 60% in 2000 to less than 1% in 2013, measured at the US$5/day threshold. This is a remarkable achievement, as it was the fastest poverty reduction rate in the Europe and Central Asia region. By 2020, the poverty rate at the national poverty line had further decreased to 4.8%.

While the poverty rate in Belarus has improved overall, there have been fluctuations in recent years. Between 2014 and 2016, a two-year recession led to an increase of 3 percentage points in the share of the population living below the PPP US$10/day threshold, with a 6 percentage point increase in rural areas. This highlights the fragility of Belarus's economic situation and the need for continued efforts to address poverty.

The progress made in poverty reduction can be attributed to various factors, including rapid economic growth, high employment rates, and steady wage increases. The country's economic growth was supported by favourable energy pricing from Russia and strong economic growth in its trading partners, which boosted the manufacturing and agricultural sectors. Additionally, government policies, such as direct transfers and taxes, have helped reduce income inequality and improve living standards for the bottom 40% of the population.

However, there are challenges to sustaining this progress. The factors that contributed to past success, such as favourable energy pricing and high productivity in the state-owned sector, may no longer be as advantageous. Slowdown in Russian demand growth, less favourable fuel import prices, tighter debt constraints, and ageing infrastructure are concerns for the future.

Moreover, Belarus faces long-term challenges such as population ageing, which will impact the workforce, investment, and pension payments. The country will need to address these issues and adopt new economic policies to continue improving living standards and reducing poverty.

Rural poverty rate

Belarus has made significant progress in reducing poverty over the past two decades. The share of the population below the national poverty line fell from 41.9% in 2000 to 5.7% in 2016, with the poverty headcount falling below 1% in 2013. However, rural areas continue to face higher poverty rates and lower welfare compared to urban areas.

Rural poverty in Belarus is influenced by various factors, including large household sizes, a high number of children, single motherhood, and unemployment. These factors negatively impact household welfare and increase the risk of poverty. According to UNICEF, multidimensional child poverty (MDCP), which includes deprivations beyond income, such as access to water, sanitation, and education, is higher in rural areas at 29.5%.

The impact of economic crises on rural communities in Belarus has been significant. During the 2015-2016 economic crisis, the poverty headcount ratio for absolute poverty increased by 14.4 percentage points, affecting rural areas more severely. The rural poverty rate reached 40.6%, a 25.3% disparity compared to urban areas. This disparity highlights the disproportionate impact of economic downturns on rural communities.

To address rural poverty, Belarus has made efforts to provide aid to low-income families, especially those with children. The government offers one-time benefits to families facing hardships and provides food supplies to children up to two years old, regardless of income. However, future improvements in living standards, particularly in rural areas, will require new economic policies to sustain poverty reduction.

While Belarus has made remarkable progress in reducing overall poverty, rural areas continue to face higher poverty rates and unique challenges. The government's efforts to provide aid to vulnerable families are positive steps, but addressing the underlying structural issues will be crucial for long-term poverty alleviation in rural Belarus.

Urban poverty rate

Belarus has made significant progress in reducing poverty over the past two decades. In the 1990s, following the collapse of the USSR, Belarus was one of the poorest countries in Europe, with around 50% of its population living below the poverty line. However, by 2020, the national poverty rate had dropped to 4.8%. This impressive reduction in poverty can be attributed to various factors, including economic growth, favourable energy pricing from Russia, and the performance of its trading partners, which boosted the country's manufacturing and agricultural sectors.

While the overall poverty rate in Belarus has declined, there are still disparities between urban and rural areas. According to data from 2011, the poverty rate in urban areas was 28%, while in rural areas, it reached 45%. This gap widened further in 2015-2016, with urban poverty at 25.3% and rural poverty at 40.6%. Several factors contribute to this disparity, including household size, the number of children, and the presence of single mothers, which are more prevalent in rural areas.

The Belarusian government has implemented various measures to address poverty. Direct transfers, such as pensions, have been the most effective fiscal interventions in reducing poverty and inequality. Additionally, government taxes and spending policies have helped redistribute income from the rich to the poor, benefiting 97.5% of the population with a market income below PPP US$10/day.

However, there are concerns about the sustainability of Belarus's poverty reduction achievements. The factors that contributed to past success, such as high economic growth and favourable energy pricing, may no longer be as advantageous. Additionally, Belarus needs to address challenges such as population ageing, which will put more strain on social security systems.

To maintain its progress in poverty reduction, Belarus may need to adopt new economic policies and structural reforms to promote higher productivity and sustainable shared prosperity. Addressing the urban-rural disparity in poverty rates and continuing to support vulnerable groups through direct transfers and progressive taxation will be crucial for Belarus's future efforts to eradicate poverty.

Income distribution

Belarus has an upper-middle-income mixed economy, with a strong emphasis on full employment and a dominant public sector. It has been described as a welfare state or market socialist.

The country has a highly centralised economy, with the government controlling key industries and eschewing privatisation. This has resulted in a rigid wage determination process and a highly regulated labour market. The private sector has little autonomy, and important elements of the central planning system remain in place.

In 2020, the poverty rate at the national poverty line for Belarus was 4.8%, a significant decline from 28.9% in 2001. The national poverty rate is the percentage of the population living below the national poverty line, with estimates based on population-weighted subgroup estimates from household surveys.

In 2017, the overall poverty rate was 5.9%, while the rate of child poverty stood at 11.3%. The most vulnerable communities are those in rural areas, single-parent homes, and homes with three or more children. The multidimensional child poverty (MDCP) rate, which includes deprivations beyond income, such as access to water, sanitation, and adequate food, was 16.7% in 2017.

Belarus has a low Gini coefficient, indicating relatively low inequality compared to other European countries. However, it is in the top third of countries with the highest inequality between regions. The average gap in household per capita consumption between the richest and poorest regions is close to two-thirds of the country's mean consumption. This inequality is attributed to a lack of economic opportunities in lagging regions.

The income distribution in Belarus has improved over time, with the poverty rate declining gradually from 2001 to 2020. However, there are still disparities within the country, particularly between regions, which the government aims to address through policies supporting urban development, local transport links, and income support for low-income earners.

Economic growth

Belarus has experienced significant economic growth over the past two decades, lifting many of its citizens out of poverty. In the 1990s, Belarus was one of the poorest countries in Europe, with around 50% of its population living below the poverty line. However, the country has since made remarkable progress, reducing poverty rates faster than any other country in the Europe and Central Asia region.

The period of 2006-2011 saw the highest rate of economic growth in Belarus. This growth was underpinned by several factors, including favourable energy pricing from Russia and strong economic growth in other trading partners, which boosted the country's manufacturing, agricultural, and mining sectors. This high economic growth enabled the government to maintain high levels of employment and steadily increase wages and pensions.

The inclusiveness of Belarus's economic growth during this time is evident in the fact that while many European countries were suffering from the effects of the financial crisis, with incomes falling for the bottom 40% of their populations, Belarus's bottom 40% experienced an increase in expenditures. The poverty headcount in Belarus fell from 60% in 2000 to less than 1% in 2013, measured at the internationally comparable Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) US$5/day threshold.

However, it is important to note that not everyone has benefited equally from this economic growth. While poverty rates have declined, there is a widening wealth gap, with the richest 20% of Belarusians owning an increasing share of the total wealth. Additionally, unemployment remains a significant issue, with less than 10% of unemployed people receiving welfare benefits.

To sustain and build upon the economic growth achieved, Belarus will need to address several challenges. Firstly, the factors that enabled past success, such as favourable energy pricing from Russia, may no longer be as advantageous. Additionally, Belarus will need to tackle issues related to population ageing, with fewer workers, less investment, and an increasing number of pensions to be paid. Implementing structural economic reforms and adopting policies for higher productivity will be crucial for faster economic growth and continued improvements in living standards.

Frequently asked questions