
In 1985, the Austrian wine industry suffered a devastating blow when it was discovered that several large wineries had been using diethylene glycol, a toxic chemical found in antifreeze, to sweeten their wines. This scandal, known as the Glycol Scandal, resulted in a complete collapse of Austrian wine exports and a significant loss of reputation for the entire industry. It took over a decade for the industry to recover, and strict new wine laws were enacted in the aftermath. The scandal also had a notable impact on German wines, as some Austrian wines were illegally blended into German wines during bottling, leading to widespread contamination.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Year | 1985 |
| Incident | Several Austrian wineries adulterated their wines with diethylene glycol, a toxic substance and component of antifreeze, to make their wines taste sweeter and more full-bodied. |
| Affected Countries | Austria, Germany, and Australia |
| Exports Impact | Exports dropped from 205 million litres to 20 million litres in 1986. |
| Wine Destroyed | 27 million litres (36 million bottles) |
| Country Impact | Mayor Heribert Altinger of Rust commented that it was the "worst disaster to hit this region since World War II". |
| Long-term Effects | The Austrian wine industry focused on producing dry white wines instead of sweet wines, and targeted a higher market segment. |
| Legislative Changes | The Austrian government enacted stricter wine laws. |
Explore related products
What You'll Learn

Austrian wine exports collapsed
In 1985, Austrian winemakers were found to have been adding diethylene glycol (a toxic chemical found in antifreeze) to their wines to make them taste sweeter and more full-bodied. This practice was illegal and had the potential to cause organ failure in consumers. As a result of the scandal, 27 million litres of wine (approximately 36 million bottles) were confiscated and destroyed by the West German authorities.
The scandal had a devastating impact on the Austrian wine industry, causing exports to collapse overnight. Austria's reputation as a wine-producing country was severely damaged, and it took over a decade for the industry to recover to its pre-1985 export levels. The scandal also prompted legislative changes, with the Austrian government enacting stricter wine laws to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.
Prior to the scandal, Austrian wines were known for being sweet and cheap, and they were often exported to Germany for bottling and sale. The addition of diethylene glycol allowed winemakers to create a sweeter product without altering the flavour profile, as too much sugar would have affected the taste. This practice was initially difficult to detect, but it eventually came to light when wine laboratories in West Germany performed quality controls on wines sold in the country.
The scandal had far-reaching consequences, not only for the Austrian wine industry but also for German wines. It affected not just the wineries but also the livelihoods of many honest people in the industry. The German market, which was Austria's largest customer, lost trust in Austrian wines, and sales dropped significantly. The scandal also resulted in a shift in the type of wines produced by Austria, with winemakers abandoning sweet wines and focusing on dry white wines instead.
Despite the initial devastation, the scandal ultimately led to positive changes in the Austrian wine industry. It forced winemakers to focus on quality and reputation, and today, Austrian wines are known for their high standards and are appreciated by consumers worldwide.
Boost Plans in Austria: Availability and Benefits Explored
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Wine scandal involving diethylene glycol
In 1985, the Austrian wine industry was hit by a scandal when it was discovered that several large wineries had been using diethylene glycol (DEG), a toxic chemical found in antifreeze, to make their wines taste sweeter and more full-bodied. This practice was illegal and posed potential health risks to consumers, leading to a swift response from authorities.
The scandal was uncovered by wine laboratories in West Germany, who were performing quality controls on wines sold in the country. The first wine found to contain DEG was a 1983 Ruster Auslese from a supermarket in Stuttgart, analysed on June 27, 1985. As a result, the Federal Ministry of Health in Bonn issued an official health warning against the consumption of Austrian wines on July 9, and the news quickly made headlines worldwide.
The short-term impact of the scandal was devastating for the Austrian wine industry. There was a complete collapse of Austrian wine exports, with about 27 million litres (36 million bottles) of contaminated wine confiscated and destroyed by the West German authorities. This amount of wine corresponded to seven months' worth of Austria's total wine exports before 1985. The disposal of such a large quantity of wine proved challenging, as DEG was incompatible with sewage treatment plants. Ultimately, the confiscated wine was poured into cement factory ovens as a cooling agent instead of water.
The scandal also had a significant adverse impact on the reputation of German wines, as some Austrian wines had been illegally blended into German wines during bottling in West Germany. This resulted in diethylene glycol ending up in some bulk-bottled West German wines as well. Legal action was taken in West Germany, with six former leading employees of the wholesale dealer and bottler Pieroth being fined one million Deutsche Marks.
In response to the scandal, Austria enacted much stricter wine laws to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future. The new legislation was rushed through parliament and came into effect before the 1985 harvest. Despite these efforts, it took the Austrian wine industry over a decade to recover its reputation and export levels.
Who's the Boss? Understanding Austria's Leadership Title
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Wine industry's recovery and improvements
The Austrian wine industry suffered a severe setback in 1985 due to the diethylene glycol wine scandal, but it has since recovered and made significant improvements. Here is an overview of the industry's recovery and the enhancements made:
Immediate Response and Challenges:
The scandal's discovery led to a complete collapse of Austrian wine exports and a tarnished reputation for the industry. The Austrian government sprang into action, enacting stricter wine laws and regulations to restore trust. The challenge was daunting, as the industry had to rebuild its standing not just in Austria but also in key export markets like West Germany, where the scandal had made headlines.
Stricter Regulations and Quality Control:
The Austrian Parliament passed more stringent wine laws on August 29, 1985, with the aim of having them in place before the year's harvest. These laws were touted as the toughest in Europe, signalling the country's commitment to reform. The industry responded by implementing strict quality control measures, including seals of approval on bottle caps or foils to assure consumers of the wines' integrity.
Marketing and Brand Rehabilitation:
Recognizing the need to rebuild their image, the Austrian Wine Marketing Board was established in 1986 under the leadership of the new Agricultural Minister, Erich Schmidt. The board embarked on an aggressive marketing strategy to promote Austrian wine's advantages and unique qualities. This proactive approach aimed to showcase the industry's commitment to transparency and stringent quality standards.
Diversification and Targeting Higher Market Segments:
The scandal prompted a shift in focus for Austrian wine producers. They diversified their offerings, moving away from primarily sweet wines and increasingly targeting higher market segments. This strategy aligned with consumer preferences and positioned Austrian wines as premium products.
Long-Term Recovery and Global Recognition:
The road to recovery was long, and it took over a decade for the industry to regain its pre-1985 export levels. However, the scandal ultimately catalyzed positive change. Austrian wines gained global recognition for their quality, with consumers willing to pay higher prices. The combination of stringent quality checks, meticulous processes, and a focus on distinctiveness elevated Austrian wines to new heights.
The Austrian wine industry's resilience and dedication to improvement transformed it into a respected and sought-after wine-producing country, producing some of the world's finest wines.
Austria's Political Decisions: A Behavioral Study
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Stricter wine laws and legislation
In 1985, the Austrian wine industry was hit by a scandal when it was discovered that several large wineries had been using diethylene glycol (a toxic chemical found in antifreeze) to make their wines taste sweeter and more full-bodied. This practice was illegal and had the potential to cause organ failure in consumers. As a result, the Austrian government enacted much stricter wine laws and legislation to restore trust and confidence in the industry.
The new legislation aimed to address the issues that led to the scandal and to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future. It focused on enhancing quality control measures, improving transparency in the wine production process, and enforcing stricter penalties for non-compliance. Here are some of the key components of the stricter wine laws and legislation:
- Enhanced Quality Control: The Austrian government implemented rigorous quality control measures to ensure the safety and authenticity of wines produced in the country. This included mandatory testing and analysis of wines at various stages of production to detect any illegal additives or harmful substances. Laboratories and testing facilities were established, or existing ones were given additional resources, to carry out these tests and ensure the accuracy of results.
- Improved Transparency: New laws emphasised transparency throughout the wine production process. Wineries were required to maintain detailed records of all ingredients, additives, and processes used in vinification. These records were subject to periodic audits by government inspectors to verify compliance with regulations. Additionally, clear and detailed labelling requirements were put in place to provide consumers with accurate information about the contents and production methods of the wine they were purchasing.
- Stricter Penalties: The penalties for adulterating wine or engaging in fraudulent practices were significantly increased. Fines, revocations of licences, and even criminal charges were implemented to deter winemakers from engaging in illegal activities. The Austrian government also established a system to hold accountable not only the winemakers but also any distributors, wholesalers, or retailers found complicit in the illegal adulteration or distribution of tainted wine.
- Government Oversight: The government assumed a more active role in regulating the wine industry. This included increasing the frequency of inspections, particularly for larger wineries with a higher risk of non-compliance. The government also established a task force or agency dedicated to investigating and addressing wine fraud, working closely with law enforcement agencies to enforce the new legislation.
- International Cooperation: Recognising that Austrian wines were exported globally, the Austrian government collaborated with other countries, particularly those in the European Union, to harmonise standards and regulations. This cooperation aimed to ensure that Austrian wines exported to other markets met the same stringent requirements as those consumed domestically. It also facilitated the sharing of information and best practices to enhance the overall safety and quality of wines across borders.
The implementation of these stricter wine laws and legislation had both short-term and long-term impacts on the Austrian wine industry. Initially, there was a complete collapse of wine exports and the industry suffered a total loss of reputation. However, the strict measures taken by the Austrian government helped rebuild trust and confidence in Austrian wines over time. The focus on quality and transparency attracted a more discerning segment of wine consumers, and Austrian winemakers gradually shifted their production towards dry white wines, targeting a higher market segment.
Austrian Delicacies: A Food Lover's Guide
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Impact on German wine industry
In 1985, the Austrian wine industry was hit by a scandal that revealed several large wineries had been using diethylene glycol, a toxic substance and component of antifreeze, to make their wines taste sweeter. This practice was also found to have extended to German wines, as Austrian wines were exported to West Germany in bulk to be bottled at large-scale bottling facilities, where some were illegally blended with German wines. This resulted in diethylene glycol ending up in some bulk-bottled West German wines.
The scandal had a significant adverse impact on the reputation of German wines, with German distributors involved in the scandal facing near bankruptcy. In the aftermath, West German authorities confiscated or collected around 27 million litres of contaminated wine, which had to be disposed of in an environmentally friendly way. As diethylene glycol was incompatible with sewage treatment plants, the tainted wine was eventually poured into the ovens of a cement plant as a cooling agent.
The German word for the scandal, "Glykolwein-Skandal", was elected as the "word of the year 1985" in Germany. The scandal led to lengthy investigations and legal action in West Germany, with six former leading employees of the wholesale dealer and bottler Pieroth being fined one million Deutsche Marks.
The impact of the scandal on the German wine industry extended beyond the immediate environmental and legal consequences. It also had lasting effects on consumer trust and the reputation of German wines, particularly those produced in West Germany. The scandal revealed the vulnerabilities and potential for fraud in the wine industry, not only in Austria but also in Germany. This likely led to increased scrutiny and stricter regulations for wine producers and distributors in both countries.
Overall, the 1985 Austrian wine scandal had far-reaching consequences for the German wine industry, highlighting the interconnectedness of the global wine market and the potential for contamination and fraud in wine production and distribution.
Renting a Car in Austria: Is It Worth It?
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
The Austrian wine industry collapsed in 1985 after it was discovered that several large wineries had been using diethylene glycol (a component of antifreeze) to make their wines sweeter.
Wine laboratories in West Germany uncovered the scandal while performing quality controls on wines sold in the country. The first wine discovered to contain diethylene glycol (DEG) was a 1983 Ruster Auslese from a supermarket in Stuttgart, analysed on 27 June 1985.
The scandal led to a complete collapse of Austrian wine exports and a total loss of reputation for the industry. It took over a decade for exports to recover to pre-1985 levels.
In response to the scandal, the Austrian government enacted stricter wine laws. Additionally, 27 million litres (36 million bottles) of contaminated wine were confiscated and destroyed by West German authorities.




























