Nationalists' Demands In Austria-Hungary: The 1800S Turmoil

The nationalist movements in Austria-Hungary during the 1800s sought to promote ethnic identity and political representation for their respective groups. German nationalists, for instance, sought greater political power and cultural influence for German-speaking Austrians, while Hungarian nationalists advocated for greater autonomy and independence for Hungary within the dual monarchy. Other nationalist movements included Czech, Slovak, Polish, and Italian nationalists, each seeking recognition and representation for their respective groups within the larger Austro-Hungarian Empire.

Greater political power and cultural influence for German-speaking Austrians

German nationalists in Austria-Hungary sought greater political power and cultural influence for German-speaking Austrians. This was part of a broader movement in the 1800s to promote the interests and identity of various ethnic groups within the empire, including Hungarians, Czechs, Slovaks, Poles, and Italians.

The Compromise (Ausgleich) of 1867 established the Dual Monarchy, giving Hungarians equal footing with Germans and granting them full internal autonomy. This agreement, however, did not extend to other ethnic groups in the empire, and Hungarians came to monopolise political power in their half of the empire. As a result, German nationalists faced the challenge of navigating a political system that restricted parliamentary power and gave the emperor control over foreign affairs.

German nationalists in Austria-Hungary sought to secure greater political power and cultural influence for German-speaking Austrians. They wanted their language and culture to hold a position of dominance, particularly in areas such as education, government, and the military. They also wanted to maintain the power they held within the civil service and the army.

One way German nationalists attempted to achieve their goals was by opposing reforms that granted minority language or cultural rights to other ethnic groups. They saw such reforms as a threat to their dominance and sought to preserve the status quo. This often resulted in intense nationalist rivalries, particularly between Germans and Czechs in Bohemia. German nationalists also faced opposition from other Germans who advocated for the creation of a greater Germany, which would involve the incorporation of German-speaking territories outside of Austria-Hungary.

The pursuit of greater political power and cultural influence for German-speaking Austrians by German nationalists in Austria-Hungary was a complex and challenging endeavour, given the multi-national nature of the empire and the competing interests of various ethnic groups. It often resulted in nationalist rivalries and contributed to the overall tension within the empire.

Greater autonomy and independence for Hungary

The nationalist movement in Hungary during the 1800s sought greater autonomy and independence for the country within the dual monarchy of Austria-Hungary. The Hungarian nationalists, or Magyars, wanted to be on equal footing with the Austrian Germans, who had dominated the empire before 1867. The Ausgleich, or compromise, of 1867 placed the Hungarians on equal political footing with the Germans, giving them full internal autonomy and control over their own government and internal affairs. While the empire was still considered a single great state for war and foreign affairs, Hungary had its own king, Francis Joseph I from the Habsburg family, and its own parliament.

The Hungarians' pursuit of greater autonomy and independence was not without challenges and tensions. There were three common ministries—war, finance, and foreign relations—that were shared between Austria and Hungary. The Hungarian language was made compulsory in government, education, law, and railways, and over 90% of official posts were reserved for Hungarians. This caused resentment among other ethnic groups, particularly the Germans, who saw their position of political supremacy being undermined. There were also demands from other nationalities within Hungary, such as Romanians, Serbs, and Slovaks, for equal political and cultural rights, which the Hungarians resisted.

Despite these challenges, the arrangement of the Dual Monarchy between Austria and Hungary worked well until 1918. The major factors that kept the empire together included loyalty to Emperor Francis Joseph I, who was personally popular and spoke nearly all the languages of the empire; the shared Catholic religion of the majority of the population; and the dominance of Germans in the civil service and the army.

Recognition and representation for Czechs

In the 1800s, nationalists in Austria-Hungary wanted to promote the interests and identity of their respective ethnic groups. Czech nationalists were no exception to this, seeking recognition and representation for their ethnic group within the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

The Czech nationalist movement was largely driven by intellectuals and focused on linguistic, literary, and historical efforts to shield Czech national identity from further Germanisation. One of the key figures in this movement was Frantisek (Francis) Palacky, known as the "Father of the Czech Nation." Palacky was a historian who wrote a seminal work on Czech history, glorifying figures like the Hussites and emphasising the conflict between Czechs and Germans as a key characteristic of Bohemian history. He also explicitly rejected German claims to Bohemia, citing three reasons for his refusal to join the Frankfurt Parliament: his Czech identity, his belief that a German state would undermine the Austrian Empire, and his view that a republic within the Austrian Empire would invite Russian expansion.

In addition to historical and literary efforts, Czech nationalists also made political strides towards recognition and representation. In 1848, two political programmes were presented in Prague: the "March Program" and the "Second Petition of Prague." The "March Program" called for one assembly of freely elected deputies representing Bohemia, with equal status for the Czech and German languages in administration. The "Second Petition of Prague" went further, asking for the union of Bohemia and Moravia in one autonomous province within the Austrian Empire. While these programmes faced opposition from German liberals, who held political power in parliament from 1867 to 1879 and sought to maintain German dominance, they laid the groundwork for future gains.

In 1871, the "Old Czechs," as the Czech leaders came to be known, seemed to have succeeded in their efforts. The government agreed to the Fundamental Articles, which would have reinstated the historic rights of the Bohemian Kingdom, including equal language rights for Czechs and Germans in the Bohemian "outer service" and law. However, violent protests from German and Hungarian liberals prevented the adoption of these articles. It wasn't until 1880 that a language decree officially put Czech on equal footing with German in the "outer service." Additionally, in 1882, Charles-Ferdinand University in Prague was divided into separate Czech and German institutions.

Despite these gains, conflict between Czechs and Germans continued, particularly over local administration and education. This conflict intensified as a younger and more radical Czech intelligentsia denounced attempts at compromise, leading to the rise of the "Young Czechs" who defeated the "Old Czechs" in 1891. In the final decade of the empire, obstructionism by both Czechs and Germans rendered parliamentary politics ineffectual, and governments rose and fell frequently.

During this tumultuous period, Czech culture flourished, with significant developments in art, literature, theatre, music, sports, folk dance, and song. Education also reached a very high level, with 98% of Czechs literate by 1914. In the economic sphere, Czech industry became highly diversified, producing everything from buttons to racing cars, and Czech farms prospered due to modern machinery, methods, and marketing conditions.

While the Czech nationalist movement achieved notable successes, the struggle for recognition and representation remained ongoing in the lead-up to World War I.

Recognition and representation for Slovaks

The Slovak nationalist movement in Austria-Hungary during the 1800s sought recognition and representation for Slovaks within the Austro-Hungarian Empire. This movement was one of many nationalist movements within the empire, including those of the Germans, Hungarians, Czechs, Poles, and Italians. Each of these groups advocated for the interests and identity of their respective ethnic group.

Slovak nationalists wanted to secure equal rights and political representation for Slovaks within the empire. They sought to promote and protect their ethnolinguistic identity, which united speakers of the Slovak language as a nation, even if they did not identify with it. This was particularly important in Hungary, which defined itself as a nation-state and sought to Magyarise its population, restricting minority languages. In contrast, the Austrian legal framework, following the Compromise of 1867, guaranteed equality to the various nations within the empire. However, speakers of non-German languages in the Austrian part of the monarchy sometimes struggled to gain full equality in education, the judicial system, and administration.

Slovak nationalists wanted their voices heard and their interests represented in the political organs of the empire. They sought to elect their representatives to the various diets (assemblies) and parliaments of the empire, such as the Diet of Hungary and the Croatian-Slavonian Diet, which allowed the empire's subjects to feel a sense of dual identity. They also wanted to be recognised as one of the official nations of the empire, which were categorised in the statistical survey of the Common Army.

Recognition and representation for Italians

The Italians were one of the eleven major ethno-linguistic groups in the Austro-Hungarian Empire. They were a minority group, with the majority of Italians living in the Austrian half of the empire.

In the second half of the 19th century, the Austrian legal framework guaranteed equality to these ethno-linguistic groups. However, in practice, Italians in the Austrian half of the empire occasionally struggled to gain full equality in education, the judicial system, and administration.

Nationalism was a significant force in the empire in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Nationalists sought to promote the interests and identity of their respective ethnic groups. The Italian nationalist movement in Austria-Hungary wanted recognition and representation for Italians within the larger Austro-Hungarian Empire.

During World War I, Italy entered the war on the Entente side, aiming to annex Austrian territories. The Italian front involved a series of military engagements along the border between the Kingdom of Italy and Austria-Hungary from 1915 to 1918. The Italian army was poorly equipped and suffered from low morale. Despite this, the Italians managed to capture Trento and Trieste, and Austria-Hungary eventually disintegrated due to military defeats and internal turmoil caused by pacifists and separatists.

In the post-war period, Italy occupied several territories that had previously been part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, including Trento, Trieste, Rovigno, Parenzo, Zara, and Fiume. However, Italy's gains fell short of what had been promised by the Allies, leading to a sense of "mutilated victory" that fuelled Italian fascism and imperialism in the interwar period.

Frequently asked questions