Bolivian Revolution: Roots Of Change And Uprising

The Bolivian National Revolution of 1952 was sparked by a coup d'etat in April of that year. The coup was led by Hernan Siles Zuazo of the Movimiento Nationalista Revolutionario (MNR), a powerful national opposition party that had formed in the 1940s. The MNR was a loose coalition of mine workers, Indian subsistence farmers, and middle-class mestizos. The coup was a response to the military junta's refusal to hand over power to the winner of the 1951 election, Victor Paz Estenssoro, the MNR candidate. The junta was headed by General Hugo Ballivián and included General Antonió Seleme Vargas, who was in charge of the police force of La Paz. Despite the junta's attempts to maintain control, the MNR had deep support, and the Bolivian army ultimately surrendered, paving the way for a radical political shift in the country.

The rise of new political groups

The MNR played a crucial role in the revolution, launching an armed takeover of La Paz in collaboration with disaffected elements of the National Police. On April 9, 1952, the MNR, in alliance with mine workers, successfully seized control of the city. This event marked the beginning of the National Revolution, with Estenssoro assuming the presidency.

Once in power, the MNR quickly established its populist credentials by implementing a series of reforms. In July 1952, the government established universal suffrage, with neither literacy nor property requirements. This move dramatically increased the number of eligible voters, expanding political participation. The MNR government also worked to exert control over the armed forces, purging officers associated with past Conservative Party regimes and reducing the military's size and budget.

Another significant action taken by the MNR was the nationalisation of the mining industry. The government made the export and sale of minerals a state monopoly, administered by the state-owned Mining Bank of Bolivia. They also established the Mining Corporation of Bolivia (Comibol) to run state-owned mines. On October 31, 1952, they nationalised the three largest tin companies, leaving medium-sized mines untouched and promising compensation. Through these measures, the MNR transferred two-thirds of Bolivia's mining industry to Comibol.

The MNR government also initiated far-reaching agrarian reforms. In August 1953, they passed the Agrarian Reform Law, which abolished forced labour and redistributed land from traditional landlords to Indian peasants. The law provided for compensation to landlords in the form of long-term government bonds. Additionally, the government established the Ministry of Peasant Affairs and organised peasants into syndicates, granting them land and arming their militias.

The MNR's policies had a significant impact on the country, reshaping the political and economic landscape of Bolivia. However, their actions also contributed to economic challenges. Nationalising the mines, for example, had negative consequences due to a lack of technical expertise and capital investment, coupled with declining tin prices. Additionally, the agrarian reforms led to a decrease in agricultural production as peasants struggled to adapt to a market economy and faced challenges with transportation.

Despite these difficulties, the MNR's rise and their implementation of populist reforms played a pivotal role in the Bolivian Revolution, reshaping the country's political and social dynamics.

Universal suffrage

The Bolivian Revolution of 1952 was sparked by a coup d'etat in April 1952, which saw the removal of General Hugo Ballivián's military junta. The junta had come to power when the previous government refused to accept the results of the 1951 election, in which Victor Paz Estenssoro of the Movimiento Nationalista Revolutionario (MNR) was victorious.

In July 1952, the new government established universal suffrage, with no literacy or property requirements. This meant that in the first post-revolutionary elections in 1956, the number of eligible voters increased from around 200,000 to nearly 1 million. This was a significant step towards democracy in Bolivia.

The Bolivian Revolution of 1952–1964 was led by the "reluctant revolutionaries" of the MNR, who looked to Mexico rather than the Soviet Union for a model. The revolution brought about significant political and economic changes in Bolivia, but it also faced challenges and setbacks. The MNR struggled with internal divisions and was unable to build a strong foundation for democratic civilian rule. Economic problems, including inflation and a decline in agricultural production, also plagued the country during this period. Nonetheless, the establishment of universal suffrage was a key achievement of the revolutionary government, expanding political participation and empowering previously marginalised groups in Bolivian society.

Nationalization of mining industries

The Bolivian National Revolution of 1952 was a response to the country's military junta, which had seized power when the previous government refused to concede to the winner of the 1951 election, Victor Paz Estenssoro of the Movimiento Nationalista Revolutionario (MNR). The MNR, a powerful national opposition party, led the revolt against the ruling junta, which was ultimately overthrown.

The revolution was led by Juan Lechín, the leader of the federation of tin miners' unions, and Hernán Siles, the vice-presidential candidate of the MNR in the 1951 election. The pair summoned Victor Paz Estenssoro back from exile in Argentina, and he assumed power as the winner of the 1951 election.

Mining has been a dominant feature of the Bolivian economy and politics since 1557. The industry's nationalization into the Bolivian Mining Corporation (Comibol) following the 1952 revolution marginalized the wealthy tin barons who had played a significant role in national politics.

Comibol, created in 1952, was a large multi-mineral corporation controlled by organized labor. It was the second-largest tin enterprise in the world until it was decentralized in 1986. In addition to its mining operations, Comibol provided schooling for over 60,000 children, housing for mining families, health clinics, and subsidized commissaries.

Criticisms of Comibol's mining policies included a failure to invest in mining technology and exploration, and an inability to open new mines. It took the corporation 15 years to bring tin production to pre-revolutionary levels.

In 1985, the production of every significant mineral in the country failed to exceed the output registered in 1975, and the international tin market crashed. This prompted emergency economic measures by the government, including massive layoffs of miners.

In the 21st century, the government of Evo Morales has re-nationalized several facilities. Morales has repeatedly vowed to nationalize the mining industry, although government officials have ruled out expropriations. In 2007, Morales announced plans to move ahead with nationalization, stating that it would not be a full nationalization, and investors would be able to recover their investments.

Agrarian reform

Firstly, the law abolished forced labour, addressing a long-standing issue. It also established a program of expropriation and redistribution of land. Rural properties belonging to traditional landlords were expropriated and distributed to Indian peasants. Notably, the law differentiated between estates based on their productivity. Estates with low productivity were entirely distributed, while more productive small and medium-sized farms were allowed to retain a portion of their land. These farms were also incentivised to invest new capital to enhance agricultural production.

The Agrarian Reform Law provided for landlord compensation in the form of 25-year government bonds, with the amount based on the property's declared tax value. The government's efforts to implement agrarian reform faced challenges, as it initially struggled to control land occupation by peasants. However, the creation of the Ministry of Peasant Affairs and the organisation of peasants into syndicates helped gain their support. Peasants not only received land but were also provided with large supplies of arms, ensuring their continued political influence in Bolivia.

Influence of miners and peasants

Miners and peasants played a crucial role in the 1952 Bolivian Revolution, both as a driving force behind the uprising and as influential actors in the post-revolutionary government.

Influence of Miners

Miners were at the forefront of the revolutionary struggle, with their militias playing a decisive role in the April 1952 fighting that toppled the military junta. The miners' militias, formed by the government to counterbalance the military, became a powerful force in their own right. In the aftermath of the revolution, miners' unions, such as the Bolivian Labor Federation (COB), demanded radical change, participation in governance, and benefits for their members. The government, recognising their power, granted miners representation in the cabinet and accepted their demands for autonomous control over labour policies. Miners also benefited from increased salaries, rehiring of fired workers, and special stores.

Influence of Peasants

Peasants, or campesinos, also exerted significant influence during and after the revolution. Initially, the government struggled to control land occupation by peasants, but eventually gained their support by creating the Ministry of Peasant Affairs and organising peasants into syndicates. Peasants were granted land, and their militias were provided with large supplies of arms. This empowered the peasants as a lasting political force in Bolivia, influencing subsequent governments.

The influence of miners and peasants within the government led to significant economic and social changes. The nationalisation of mines and far-reaching agrarian reforms, including land redistribution and the abolition of forced labour, were largely driven by the demands of these groups. However, the revolutionary government faced challenges in fully implementing these reforms, and the country experienced severe economic problems, including high inflation and a decline in agricultural production.

Frequently asked questions