The Future Of South Tyrol: Austrian Or Italian?

South Tyrol, known as Alto Adige to Italians, has been a contentious issue between Austria and Italy for decades. The region was annexed to Italy in 1919 after World War I, but its German-speaking majority population has long felt a stronger affinity to Austria. This has led to an independence movement advocating for South Tyrol's secession from Italy and reunification with Austria. The movement has gained traction due to Italy's economic woes and the perception of unfair taxation by the Italian government. While most South Tyroleans seem comfortable with the current socio-political situation, a significant portion still supports independence, and many Austrians are in favour of unification.

The South Tyrolean independence movement

South Tyrol, or Alto Adige in Italian, has been a contentious issue between Austria and Italy for decades. The region was once part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire but was ceded to Italy after World War I. South Tyrol is home to a majority German-speaking population, and many residents have struggled to reconcile with the fact that the province has been part of Italy for almost a century. This has led to a strong sense of cultural and linguistic identity crisis among South Tyroleans.

The rise of Fascism in Italy and the rule of Benito Mussolini further exacerbated tensions. Mussolini pursued a policy of Italianization, attempting to suppress the German language and culture in South Tyrol. He encouraged the settlement of Italians from the south and implemented Italian vocabulary and culture, even forcing people to change their names. These actions led to widespread resentment and a desire for independence among South Tyroleans.

In the 1950s and 1960s, the South Tyrolean Liberation Committee conducted bombings of Italian infrastructure and fascist monuments, with the most notable incident being the Night of Fire in 1961. The Committee ceased its activities, but other far-right groups, such as Ein Tirol, continued similar actions. Additionally, political parties advocating for South Tyrol's secession, such as South Tyrolean Freedom, have gained some support, holding a few seats in the Provincial Council.

Polls and surveys indicate that a significant proportion of South Tyroleans support secession. A referendum on self-determination initiated by Eva Klotz, a co-founder of the separatist party South Tyrolean Freedom, showed that 90% of the 61,000 voters favored either full independence from Italy or re-annexation to Austria. Another survey by Spectra found that 89% of Austrians support South Tyrol holding an independence referendum and are in favor of unification.

The economic crisis in Italy has further fueled the independence movement. South Tyrol, as one of the wealthiest provinces in Italy, has been asked to contribute financially to bolster Italy's national budget, which goes against the region's autonomy agreement. This has led to renewed calls for independence or reunification with Austria.

Italianisation and the suppression of German speakers

The Italianisation of South Tyrol began in 1919 when the area, which was almost 90% German-speaking, was ceded by Austria to Italy. Mussolini vowed to Italianise the region, and during the interwar period, German was banned in schools, courts, and public offices, and German newspapers, publishing houses, clubs, and associations were shut down or renamed. Place names, including the region's name, were also Italianised.

In 1939, under an agreement between the Italian government and Nazi Germany, South Tyroleans were given the choice to emigrate to Germany or stay in Italy and accept their complete Italianisation. This agreement was only partially implemented due to the outbreak of World War II, but it left a painful legacy. Those who stayed were called traitors, and those who left were seen as Nazis.

After the war, the De Gasperi-Gruber Agreement of 1946 guaranteed German-speaking inhabitants of Bolzano and Trento equality of rights and safeguards for their ethnic, cultural, and economic development. German was once again taught in schools, and German surnames were permitted. However, Italian immigration to the area and a lack of implementation of the agreement's measures created fears of Italianisation and prompted demands for South Tyrol to become its own region.

In the 1970s, an improved autonomy package granted greater powers to the Autonomous Provinces of Bolzano and Trento, including control over agriculture and tourism. German was given full official language status, equal to Italian, and all official documents, announcements, and signs had to be in both languages. Education in the mother tongue was guaranteed from nursery to tertiary levels.

Today, South Tyrol is almost wholly Germanic in language, culture, and appearance, with a high standard of living. However, German-speakers in other areas of Italy do not have the same special status or protection for their culture and language.

The economic impact of reunification

The reunification of South Tyrol with Austria would have a significant economic impact on the region, given South Tyrol's status as Italy's wealthiest province. As a self-governing province, South Tyrol retains a large portion of the taxes paid within the region, with only 10% going to the Italian central government. This has contributed to South Tyrol's high level of economic prosperity, with a GDP per capita of €32,000.

However, Italy's financial crisis and economic decline since the Eurozone crisis in 2009 have created tensions in South Tyrol. The region has been asked to contribute millions to stabilize Italy's national budget, going against its autonomy agreement. This has led to increased support for the separatist movement, as some South Tyroleans feel they are being unfairly burdened by Italy's economic woes.

A reunification with Austria could have both positive and negative economic consequences. On the one hand, South Tyrol could benefit from greater economic stability by being part of a larger, more diverse economy. Austria's membership in the European Union could also provide South Tyrol with increased access to the European market and potentially attract more foreign investment. Additionally, South Tyrol's bilingual population may have better opportunities for business and trade with Northern and Southern European markets.

On the other hand, there could be challenges in integrating South Tyrol's economy with Austria's. Issues such as property rights, production costs, infrastructure, and welfare state policies would need to be carefully navigated to avoid economic disruptions. The privatization of South Tyrolean companies and the potential loss of autonomy in economic decision-making could also be points of contention.

Furthermore, the impact of reunification on the movement of people between South Tyrol and Austria should be considered. Currently, there is a steady flow of immigrants between the two regions, with 247 Austrians settling in South Tyrol and 942 South Tyroleans immigrating to Austria in 2019. A reunification could affect the job market and social welfare programs in both regions, as they would need to accommodate the influx or outflow of people.

Overall, the economic impact of reunification is complex and multifaceted. While South Tyrol currently enjoys economic prosperity and autonomy, Italy's financial crisis has created tensions. Reunification with Austria could bring economic benefits, but it would also present challenges in terms of integration and potential loss of autonomy. The impact on the movement of people and the job market should also be carefully considered.

The role of dual citizenship

The idea of offering dual citizenship to the German- and Ladin-speaking populations of South Tyrol has been floated by Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz. This proposal is part of Austria's desire to unify with South Tyrol, an Italian province that was once part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. While the idea of dual citizenship has been well-received by most parties representing German- and Ladin-speakers, it has faced opposition from Italian parties and the government in Rome.

The complexities of implementing dual citizenship in South Tyrol are multifaceted. Firstly, Austria itself does not officially permit dual nationality, which presents a legal challenge to the proposal. Secondly, determining eligibility for Austrian citizenship among South Tyroleans is a complicated task. One suggestion is to use a historical or genealogical approach, where applicants must prove their lineage to citizens of the former Austrian Empire. However, as generations pass, establishing this connection becomes increasingly difficult. An alternative method is to use an ethnic and linguistic criterion, where South Tyroleans must officially declare their linguistic group. However, no language tests are currently required to verify an individual's fluency.

The potential benefits of dual citizenship are significant for South Tyroleans. It would provide them with greater freedom and flexibility in terms of their national identity and affiliation. Additionally, it could foster a sense of inclusion and recognition for those who feel a deep affinity with Austria and its culture. From an economic perspective, dual citizenship could enhance business opportunities by granting South Tyroleans easier access to both the northern and southern European markets.

However, there are also potential drawbacks to consider. Some critics argue that offering dual citizenship could exacerbate existing tensions between linguistic groups in South Tyrol. Excluding Italian speakers from the proposal, as suggested by Chancellor Kurz, may create a sense of division and resentment within the community. Furthermore, there are concerns that the scheme could be exploited as a loophole for migrants seeking Austrian nationality.

In conclusion, the role of dual citizenship in the context of South Tyrol's relationship with Austria is a complex and contentious issue. While it has the potential to address the desires of those seeking reunification with Austria, it also risks aggravating existing cultural and linguistic tensions. As of now, with resistance from Italy and a lack of concrete proposals from Austria, a resolution to this question does not appear imminent.

The legacy of fascism

The impact of these policies was profound and long-lasting. German speakers in South Tyrol faced systematic discrimination, with limited job prospects and access to education. The fascist regime's attempts to Italianise the region were met with resistance, and some South Tyroleans chose to emigrate to the German Reich rather than submit to forced integration. This decision left painful divisions within families and communities, with those who stayed facing accusations of treason, and those who left seen as collaborators.

The end of World War II brought an end to fascist rule in Italy, and German was reinstated as an official language in South Tyrol. However, the legacy of fascism continued to cast a long shadow. Sporadic acts of nationalist terrorism in the post-war period cost 21 lives, and fascist-inspired monuments and place names remained a source of tension.

Today, the question of how to deal with the remnants of the fascist regime in South Tyrol remains a highly contested issue. Some, like the South Tyrolean Freedom Party, advocate for the removal of fascist relics, arguing that they glorify the past and cause political and ethnic conflicts. Others, such as the provincial branches of the Italian centre-right parties, argue for their preservation, seeing them as mere traces of the past that should be respected. A third position, put forward by the South Tyrolean People's Party, seeks to neutralise these monuments by transforming them into museums or educational tools, in an effort to reconcile the Italian and German linguistic groups.

The ongoing debate over the legacy of fascism in South Tyrol reflects the region's complex identity and history. While some South Tyroleans feel a stronger connection to Austria and the German-speaking world, others have embraced their status as Italian citizens, and still, others advocate for independence or autonomy. The question of how to deal with the remnants of fascism is intimately tied to these competing identities and continues to shape the political and social landscape of South Tyrol today.

Frequently asked questions