Press Freedom In Angola: A Realistic Dream?

Angola's press freedom has been a contentious issue for decades, with the government maintaining a tight grip on the media landscape through censorship and control of information. Despite recent improvements, including President João Lourenço holding unscripted press briefings, Angola still has a way to go before achieving a truly free press.

Since gaining independence from Portugal in 1975, the country has been governed by the Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA), which established a monopoly over the media. This monopoly began to unravel in the early 2000s, with the government lifting a ban on private television stations, although it required them to be 60% Angolan-owned. In recent years, there has been an increase in Angola's press freedom rankings, and the country now sits at 99 out of 180 countries in the Reporters Without Borders World Press Freedom Index.

However, challenges remain, with the government still heavily regulating the media and maintaining the power to revoke licenses at any time. State-owned media continues to dominate, with only a handful of private media outlets, most of which are located in the capital, Luanda. The country also lacks media diversity, with most outlets owned by businesspeople with ties to the government or the MPLA, creating a conflict of interest.

While President Lourenço has shown a willingness to engage with the press, the old guard of the MPLA still holds some power and is resistant to change. As Angola works towards greater press freedom, it will need to address these issues and develop the infrastructure and institutions necessary to support a truly free and independent media landscape.

Angola's history of government control over the media

Angola's government has historically exerted strong control over the media, with the press being used as an ideological weapon during the country's civil war from 1975 to 2002. Following independence, the government embraced highly censored and propagandistic state journalism, with the media being utilised to disseminate political rhetoric and attack enemies. This period saw the emergence of private media outlets, such as the weekly 'Correio da Semana' and the radio station 'Luanda Antena Comercial-LAC', but this was short-lived due to the resumption of the war.

The media landscape began to shift in the early 2000s, with the government lifting a ban on private television stations, albeit with the requirement that they be 60% Angolan-owned. This move was seen as a way to maintain government control over the media. In 2012, a third radio station, 'Radio Despertar', was allowed to operate.

The government's monopoly on the media started to unravel in 2013 with the creation of 'Maka Angola', a website dedicated to investigative journalism. This marked a turning point, as it demonstrated a demand for unbiased reporting in the country.

Under President João Lourenço, who came into power in 2017, there have been contradictions in Angola's approach to press freedom. While Lourenço has held unscripted press briefings and there has been an increase in the country's press freedom rankings, the government still exerts significant control over the media. The media remains heavily regulated, and the government retains the power to revoke licenses at any time, as seen in the shutdown of 'Radio Despertar' in 2020.

Overall, while Angola has made progress towards press freedom, the legacy of government control has created a culture of distrust and cynicism that will take time to change.

Current state of press freedom in Angola

Angola's press freedom has been a contentious issue for decades. Since gaining independence from Portugal in 1975, the country has been governed by the Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA), which held a monopoly over the media for 15 years. In 1991, after a UN-brokered peace deal, President José Eduardo dos Santos legalized independent media, and several news outlets were launched, including Radio Vorgan and the weekly newspaper Terra Angolana. However, Angola's first free election in 1992 did not result in a smooth transition to democracy, as UNITA, which owned the newly launched media outlets, resumed the civil war after being defeated at the polls.

Despite the challenges, Angola's private media survived and continued to play a crucial role in exposing government corruption and mismanagement. However, journalists have often faced harassment, threats, and attacks for their work. Since 1992, half a dozen reporters have been killed, and dozens more have been beaten, illegally detained, or forced into exile.

In recent years, there have been some signs of progress towards greater press freedom in Angola. The current president, João Lourenço, who was elected in 2017, has held several unscripted press briefings, a rare occurrence in the country. Additionally, in 2018, two journalists were acquitted of defamation charges, offering some encouragement to the media.

However, Angola's press freedom remains heavily restricted. The government still dominates the media landscape, with most outlets being state-owned or controlled by individuals with ties to the ruling party. This creates a conflict of interest, as these outlets are more likely to report favorably on the government to maintain their access and funding.

The few private media outlets that exist are mostly located in the capital, Luanda, and their coverage may not be representative of the entire country. The high costs of radio and TV licenses also pose a significant barrier to pluralism and diversity in the media.

Censorship and control of information continue to be significant issues in Angola. Investigative reporting on governance and the judicial system often lead to prosecutions and heavy sentences for journalists. Access to public information and government sources is challenging, and self-censorship is common among journalists due to fear of repercussions.

In 2020, the government's shutdown of Radio Despertar, one of the only independent radio stations in the country, was a significant blow to press freedom. The station was known for its critical reporting and had been a thorn in the side of the government for years.

While Angola has shown some improvement in its press freedom rankings, moving from 121st to 99th out of 180 countries in the Reporters Without Borders World Press Freedom Index, there is still a long way to go. The government's monopoly on the media for decades has created a culture of distrust and cynicism that will take time and concerted efforts to change.

The role of journalists as watchdogs over the government

Journalists play a crucial role as watchdogs over the government, especially in democratic societies. Watchdog journalism is a form of investigative journalism where journalists fact-check, interview, and scrutinize the actions of political and public figures to increase their accountability to the public. This type of journalism is essential for maintaining a healthy democracy and ensuring that elected officials fulfil their obligations to the public.

In the context of Angola, the country has struggled with press freedom due to decades of one-party rule and government control over the media. However, there have been some positive developments in recent years, with a few independent media outlets emerging. The role of journalists as watchdogs in Angola is crucial due to the country's history of government propaganda and censorship. Journalists can help rebuild trust in the media and hold those in power accountable by exposing corruption and wrongdoing.

Watchdog journalists in Angola face many challenges, including censorship, threats, attacks, and arbitrary arrests. The media landscape is still heavily dominated by state-owned outlets, and the few independent voices are mostly concentrated in the capital, Luanda. To truly embrace a free press, Angola needs to address these issues and create an environment where journalists can safely carry out their watchdog role without fear of retaliation.

The improvement of press freedom in Angola is a gradual process, and the country has a long way to go. The government needs to loosen its grip on the media and allow for more diverse and independent voices to emerge. Only then can journalists fully embrace their watchdog role and contribute to a healthier democracy in the country.

Overall, the role of journalists as watchdogs over the government is essential for any democratic society to thrive. Their work in investigating and exposing wrongdoing helps hold those in power accountable and ensures that the public receives accurate and unbiased information, which is crucial for making informed decisions and promoting good governance.

The impact of Angola's political landscape on press freedom

Angola's political landscape has had a significant impact on press freedom in the country, with a history of government control and censorship. Here is an analysis of the influence of Angola's political landscape on press freedom:

Historical Context

The Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA) has governed Angola since its independence from Portugal in 1975. During this time, the MPLA instituted a one-party state, and government propaganda was widespread. This historical context set the stage for a tightly controlled media environment.

Government Control of Media

State-owned media dominate the Angolan media landscape. Most radio stations, television channels, and newspapers are either state-owned or controlled by individuals with ties to the government or the ruling party. This control allows the government to influence the content and narrative presented to the public, limiting critical or dissenting voices.

Restrictions on Independent Media

Angola has a history of restricting independent media outlets. In the early 2000s, the government lifted a ban on private television stations but required them to be majority Angolan-owned. While a few independent radio and television stations have emerged, they often face challenges and even closure. For example, in 2020, the government shut down Radio Despertar, one of the only independent radio stations in the country, due to its critical reporting.

Censorship and Self-Censorship

Censorship and self-censorship are prevalent in Angola's media industry. Journalists practice self-censorship to avoid government scrutiny and potential repercussions. Additionally, the government has been known to revoke licenses and shut down media outlets that do not align with its interests. This creates an environment where journalists and media organizations exercise caution to avoid backlash.

Criminalization of Journalism

Journalists in Angola often face criminal charges, including defamation and libel, for their reporting. The country's laws contain vague and broad provisions that can be interpreted to restrict press freedom. As a result, journalists risk legal consequences for their work, creating a chilling effect on investigative reporting and freedom of expression.

Lack of Access to Information

Access to public information and government sources is challenging for journalists in Angola. The government tightly controls information flow, and journalists often face obstacles when seeking information for their stories. This lack of access hinders investigative reporting and limits the public's right to know.

Progress and Setbacks

There have been some positive developments towards press freedom in Angola. The election of President João Lourenço in 2017 raised hopes for change, and he has held unscripted press briefings. Additionally, the emergence of websites dedicated to investigative journalism, such as Maka Angola, has shown a demand for unbiased reporting. However, contradictions remain, with journalists still facing defamation charges and libel lawsuits.

In conclusion, Angola's political landscape has had a profound impact on press freedom. While there have been some signs of progress, the country continues to grapple with a culture of censorship, government control, and a lack of media diversity. Efforts to foster a truly free and independent press in Angola are ongoing, and it will take time to rebuild trust and encourage a more open media environment.

International perspectives on Angola's press freedom

Angola has a long history of media censorship, with the government using it as a mouthpiece for propaganda and misinformation. This has created a culture of distrust and cynicism among Angolans towards the media. In recent years, there have been efforts to increase press freedom in the country, but it still falls short of international human rights standards.

Human Rights Watch

Human Rights Watch recognises the positive steps taken by the Angolan government in reforming its media laws. However, they have expressed concern that the new laws do not fully comply with international human rights standards. They have identified several issues with the legislation, including vague definitions of criminal conduct, excessive penalties for crimes such as defamation, and a lack of independence in the regulatory body. Human Rights Watch has made several recommendations to the Angolan government, including decriminalising defamation and establishing fair and transparent licensing procedures for private media outlets.

Committee to Protect Journalists

The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) has reported on the suspension of private television channels in Angola, calling on the government to end the suspension and stop persecuting media outlets that are critical of the government. They have also highlighted the lack of community radio stations in the country, which limits access to free and impartial information for millions of Angolans.

Reporters Without Borders

Reporters Without Borders' 2018 World Press Freedom Index ranked Angola 121st out of 180 countries. In their most recent index, Angola's ranking has improved to 99th out of 180 countries, reflecting an increase in press freedom. However, they still highlight the government's control over the media and the need for further progress to achieve a truly free press.

United Nations

The United Nations Human Rights Committee has ruled that the Angolan government violated its obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights by imposing restrictions on freedom of expression that were unnecessary and disproportionate. They emphasised the importance of a free press in a democratic society, particularly during pre-election periods.

Frequently asked questions