Austria's Headscarf Ban: A Restriction On Religious Freedom?

In 2019, Austria approved a law banning girls under the age of 10 from wearing religious headscarves in primary schools. The law, which was passed by Austrian MPs and supported by the ruling right-wing government, was aimed at the Islamic headscarf and prohibited ideologically or religiously influenced clothing which is associated with the covering of the head. However, following a legal challenge by the Islamic Faith Community, the Austrian Constitutional Court overturned the ban in 2024, ruling that it was discriminatory and breached rights to religious freedom. This ruling sparked debate about the role of religious garb in public spaces and the balance between religious freedom and state neutrality.

The headscarf ban was overturned by Austria's Constitutional Court

In a landmark ruling, Austria's Constitutional Court overturned a law banning girls under the age of 10 from wearing headscarves in schools. The law, which came into force in May 2019, was introduced by the ruling conservatives in coalition with the far-right Freedom Party. The Austrian court deemed the measure unconstitutional and discriminatory, stating that it breached religious freedom and equality rights.

The ruling, made on Friday, December 11, 2020, stated that the law "contravened the principle of equality in relation to freedom of religion, belief and conscience." The court found that the ban exclusively targeted Muslim schoolgirls, thereby separating them from their peers in a discriminatory manner. This went against the state's duty to treat officially recognised religions equally. Court President Christoph Grabenwarter emphasised that the ban applied "exclusively to Muslim schoolgirls," which the court deemed unconstitutional.

The law prohibited the wearing of "religious clothing that is associated with a covering of the head" for children up to the age of 10. While the legislation did not explicitly mention headscarves, the court determined that it was aimed at Islamic head coverings. The previous coalition government, which included the conservative People's Party, had argued that the ban would protect girls from social pressures and prevent the marginalisation of Muslim girls. However, the court rejected this argument, stating that it penalised the wrong people.

The ruling was welcomed by Austria's Islamic Faith Community, the body officially recognised as representing the country's Muslims. They challenged the ban, arguing that it would not achieve equal opportunities and self-determination for girls and women. Instead, they emphasised that religious freedom is integral to their lived religious practice. The court's decision sent a strong message against discriminatory policies and affirmed the importance of religious freedom and equality in Austrian society.

The ruling also highlighted the controversial nature of the headscarf debate in Austria and the ongoing political discussions surrounding immigration and the role of Islam in Austrian society. Despite the ruling, Chancellor Sebastian Kurz's current coalition agreement with the left-wing Greens includes a plan to extend the headscarf ban up to the age of 14. This proposal continues to spark debate and underscores the complex nature of religious expression and cultural integration in Austria.

The law was deemed discriminatory and unconstitutional

In 2019, Austria approved a law banning girls aged up to 10 from wearing headscarves in schools. The law was deemed discriminatory and unconstitutional, and was overturned by Austria's Constitutional Court in December 2020.

The law prohibited children up to the age of 10 from wearing "religious clothing that is associated with a covering of the head". While the legislation did not specifically mention headscarves, the court found that it was clearly aimed at Muslim headscarves. This was in contrast to the government's argument that the ban did not apply to the patka head covering worn by Sikh boys or the kippah or kippa worn by Jewish boys.

The court ruled that the law breached rights on religious freedom and was discriminatory towards Muslim schoolgirls. Court President Christoph Grabenwarter stated that the "selective ban... applies exclusively to Muslim schoolgirls and thereby separates them in a discriminatory manner from other pupils". The ruling was welcomed by the Islamic Faith Community, the body that represents the country's Muslims, which had brought the legal challenge. They argued that "ensuring equal opportunities and self-determination for girls and women in our society is not achieved through bans".

Experts and opinion leaders also condemned the ban as a violation of human rights and the principles of equality and freedom of religion. Sonia Zaafrani, head of the Initiative for Discrimination-Free Education (IDB), argued that the law was unconstitutional, as the Christian crucifix is present in every school in the country, and Jewish children are allowed to wear the kippah. Umit Vural, head of the Islamic community in Austria, described the ban as "a black day for Austrian democracy", denying the basic rights of Muslim girls and their parents.

The law was introduced by the ruling right-wing government, formed by a coalition of the centre-right People's Party (OeVP) and the far-right Freedom Party (FPOe). Both parties had made anti-immigration rhetoric a key part of their political messaging and had warned against the development of "parallel societies" in Austria. Despite their attempts to avoid charges of discrimination, the court found that the law could only be understood as targeting Islamic head coverings.

The law was aimed at Muslim schoolgirls

In 2019, Austria approved a law banning girls aged up to 10 from wearing headscarves in schools. The law referred to "ideologically or religiously influenced clothing which is associated with the covering of the head". While it did not explicitly mention the Islamic headscarf, representatives of the governing coalition made it clear that this was the target of the law. The law was passed by the ruling right-wing government, formed of a coalition between the centre-right People's Party (OeVP) and the far-right Freedom Party (FPOe).

The court found that the law was aimed at Muslim schoolgirls and was therefore unconstitutional and discriminatory. Court President Christoph Grabenwarter stated that the "selective ban... applies exclusively to Muslim schoolgirls and thereby separates them in a discriminatory manner from other pupils". The ruling was welcomed by Austria's Islamic Faith Community, which represents the country's Muslims and brought the legal challenge. They argued that "ensuring equal opportunities and self-determination for girls and women in our society is not achieved through bans".

The law was introduced as part of an "integration" policy aimed at limiting the visibility of orthodox Islam in public life. However, critics argued that it violated basic principles of equality and freedom of religion. Sonia Zaafrani, head of the Initiative for Discrimination-Free Education (IDB), pointed out the contradiction that the Christian crucifix is present in every school in Austria, and Jewish children are allowed to wear the kippah. Experts stressed that the ban violated the basic principles of the Austrian State Treaty of 1955 and the constitution.

The head of the Islamic community in Austria, Umit Vural, described the ban as "a black day for Austrian democracy", and emphasised that it denies the basic rights of Muslim girls and their parents. The ban was also criticised for promoting discrimination and leading to the marginalisation and exclusion of Muslim girls.

The Islamic Faith Community welcomed the ruling

In a victory for religious freedom, Austria's Constitutional Court has overturned a ban on girls under the age of 10 wearing headscarves in schools. The Islamic Faith Community, which represents the country's Muslims and brought the legal challenge, welcomed the ruling, stating that "ensuring equal opportunities and self-determination for girls and women in our society is not achieved through bans".

The ruling overturns a law introduced in 2019 by the previous coalition government of the centre-right People's Party (OeVP) and the far-right Freedom Party (FPOe). The law, which was widely seen as targeting the Islamic headscarf, was found to be unconstitutional and discriminatory by the court.

The Islamic Faith Community's challenge argued that the law breached rights on religious freedom and marginalised Muslim girls. The court agreed, stating that the ban "applies exclusively to Muslim schoolgirls and thereby separates them in a discriminatory manner from other pupils". The court also rejected the government's argument that the ban could protect girls from social pressures, saying it penalised the wrong people.

The ruling is a significant development in a country where the wearing of Islamic headscarves has been a highly controversial topic. The previous government, led by Chancellor Sebastian Kurz, had consistently taken a hard line on immigration and promoted policies aimed at limiting the visibility of Islam in public life.

The Islamic Faith Community's statement welcoming the ruling emphasised the importance of equal opportunities and self-determination for girls and women. It also highlighted the discriminatory nature of the ban, which violated the basic principles of equality and freedom of religion. The ruling sends a strong message against the populist politics of bans and in favour of religious freedom and inclusion.

The law was passed by a coalition of the People's Party and the Freedom Party

In May 2019, Austrian MPs passed a law banning the headscarf in primary schools. The law was introduced by a coalition of the centre-right People's Party (also known as the Austrian People's Party or ÖVP) and the far-right Freedom Party (or FPÖ).

The law referred to "ideologically or religiously influenced clothing which is associated with the covering of the head". While it did not explicitly mention the headscarf, representatives of both parties in the coalition government made it clear that this was the target of the legislation. The Freedom Party's education spokesman, Wendelin Mölzer, said the law was "a signal against political Islam", while the People's Party MP Rudolf Taschner said it was necessary to free girls from subjugation.

The law was passed by the coalition just days before that government collapsed due to a corruption scandal involving the then-leader of the Freedom Party, Heinz-Christian Strache.

The headscarf ban was struck down by Austria's Constitutional Court in December 2020. The court ruled that the law was discriminatory and breached religious freedom. The ruling stated that the ban "applies exclusively to Muslim schoolgirls and thereby separates them in a discriminatory manner from other pupils". The court also rejected the government's argument that the ban could protect girls from social pressures, saying that it penalised the wrong people and risked making it harder for Muslim girls to access education.

Frequently asked questions