Classical Economics' Influence On Austrian School Economics

The Austrian School of Economics, also known as the Vienna School or the Psychological School, is a heterodox school of economic thought that advocates strict adherence to methodological individualism. It originated in Vienna with the work of Carl Menger, Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk, Friedrich von Wieser, and others. The Austrian School is characterised by its focus on methodological individualism and its rejection of mathematical models and data in favour of a priori thinking and thought experiments. The school holds that economic theory should be derived exclusively from basic principles of human action and that economic laws are universally applicable. The Austrian School's ideas are rooted in the work of classical economists such as Adam Smith and David Hume, as well as early-20th-century figures such as Knut Wicksell.

The Austrian School's focus on methodological individualism

The Austrian School of Economics is a heterodox school of economic thought that advocates strict adherence to methodological individualism. This is the concept that social phenomena result primarily from the motivations and actions of individuals, along with their self-interest. Austrian school theorists believe that economic theory should be derived exclusively from basic principles of human action.

Methodological individualism was introduced as a methodological precept for the social sciences by Max Weber in his 1922 book, Economy and Society. However, the practice of tracing economic phenomena back to intelligible human action can be found in economists since at least Adam Smith.

The Austrian School's approach differs from other schools of economic thought, which have focused on aggregate variables, equilibrium analysis, and societal groups rather than individuals. The Austrian School's commitment to methodological individualism is closely related to its commitment to verstehende (interpretive) patterns of explanation in sociology. This means that only action is "subjectively understandable". Action is reserved for the subset of human behaviour that is motivated by linguistically formulated or "meaningful" mental states.

The Austrian School's approach to methodological individualism has been criticised for being too focused on the action-theoretic perspective, which can generate its own fallacies. For example, too much emphasis on individual attitudes can lead to illegitimate generalisations about the characteristics of these attitudes in groups.

Despite this criticism, the Austrian School's focus on methodological individualism has provided valuable insights into numerous economic issues, such as the laws of supply and demand, the cause of inflation, the theory of money creation, and the operation of foreign exchange rates.

The Austrian School's origins in Vienna

The Austrian School of Economics, also known as the "Vienna school" or "psychological school", was founded in Vienna, Austria, in 1871 with the publication of Carl Menger's "Principles of Economics". Menger, along with economists William Stanley Jevons and Leon Walras, developed the marginalist revolution in economic analysis. Menger's book was one of the first modern treatises to advance the theory of marginal utility, which emphasised the subjective use-value of economic goods. Menger also developed a market-based theory of the function and origin of money as a medium of exchange to facilitate trade.

Menger's work was followed by that of Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk, who furthered Austrian economic theory by emphasising the element of time in economic activity. He developed theories of production, capital, and interest, in part to critique Marxist economic theories.

Böhm-Bawerk's student, Ludwig von Mises, combined the theories of Menger and Böhm-Bawerk with the ideas of Swedish economist Knut Wicksell to create Austrian Business Cycle Theory (ABCT). Mises is also known for his role in disputing the possibility of rational economic planning by socialist governments, along with his colleague Friedrich von Hayek.

Hayek's work in Austrian economics emphasised the role of information in the economy and the use of prices as a means to communicate information and coordinate economic activity. He won the Nobel Prize in 1974 for his work in monetary and business cycle theory.

The Austrian School originated in Vienna with the work of Menger, Böhm-Bawerk, Friedrich von Wieser, and others. It was methodologically opposed to the German Historical School, in a dispute known as the "methodology quarrel". The Austrian School advocated for the role of theory in economics, distinct from the study of historical circumstance.

The Austrian School's use of a priori thinking

The Austrian School of Economics, also known as the Vienna School or the Psychological School, is characterised by its use of a priori thinking. This means that its proponents believe that economic laws of universal application can be discovered through logic and a person's capacity for independent thought, rather than through empirical observation or data analysis. This is in contrast to mainstream schools of economics, such as neoclassical economics, which rely on data and mathematical models.

The Austrian School's a priori thinking is closely linked to its emphasis on methodological individualism, which holds that social phenomena result primarily from the motivations, actions, and self-interest of individuals. This focus on the individual is reflected in their belief that only individuals make choices, and that economic analysis should be based on individual purposes and plans.

The Austrian School's a priori thinking has led them to develop a subjectivist approach to marginal economics, where the value of goods and services is determined by an individual's subjective preferences. This approach was first outlined by Carl Menger in his book "Principles of Economics" (1871), which is considered the founding text of the Austrian School. Menger argued that economic values are subjective in nature, and that the value of a good diminishes as the number of goods increases.

Overall, the Austrian School's use of a priori thinking allows them to develop economic theories that are accessible and understandable to citizens, providing them with the knowledge to recognise political seductions that may threaten freedom and prosperity.

The Austrian School's influence on modern economics

The Austrian School of Economics, also known as the "'Vienna School' or the 'Psychological School', is a heterodox school of economic thought that advocates strict adherence to methodological individualism. It originated in Vienna with the work of Carl Menger, Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk, Friedrich von Wieser, and others, and has since spread worldwide, with a particularly strong influence in the English-speaking world. The school holds that the only valid economic theory is logically derived from basic principles of human action, and that economic theory should be exclusively derived from these principles. This approach, which includes a focus on autonomous entrepreneurial action and the free interaction of individuals in the marketplace, allows the Austrian School to explain economic relations and their social and political implications in a highly accurate and accessible way.

The Austrian School has had a significant influence on modern economics, with many of its theories now absorbed into mainstream economics. These include Carl Menger's theories on marginal utility, Friedrich von Wieser's theories on opportunity cost, and Eugen Böhm von Bawerk's theories on time preference. The Austrian School's influence can also be seen in the work of later economists, such as Frank Albert Fetter, who led the introduction of Austrian thought in the United States, and Henry Hazlitt, whose book "Economics in One Lesson" (1946) sold over a million copies.

The Austrian School's emphasis on methodological individualism and its rejection of aggregate variables, equilibrium analysis, and societal groups as a unit of study set it apart from other schools of economic thought. Instead, it focuses on the individual as the fundamental unit of analysis, with economic values and costs determined by subjective factors and individual preferences. This subjectivist approach to marginal economics is a key contribution of the Austrian School, challenging the classical school's view that objective costs of production determine prices.

Additionally, the Austrian School's methodological approach differs from that of mainstream economists. While most schools of economics use data and mathematical models, the Austrian School employs a priori thinking and "thought experiments" to discover economic laws of universal application. This approach is rooted in the belief that mathematics cannot capture the complex reality of human action and that quantifiable relationships are only applicable in the absence of change.

The Austrian School's influence can also be seen in its impact on the revival of laissez-faire thought in the 20th century, particularly through the work of Friedrich Hayek, who won the 1974 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences. Hayek's work, along with that of other Austrian School economists, has contributed to a better understanding of various economic issues, including the laws of supply and demand, the cause of inflation, the theory of money creation, and the operation of foreign exchange rates.

Overall, the Austrian School of Economics has had a significant and lasting influence on modern economics, challenging mainstream theories and offering unique insights into complex economic issues.

The Austrian School's view of the market mechanism as a process

The Austrian School views the market mechanism as a process and not an outcome of a design. In other words, people create markets with the intention to improve their lives, not through any conscious decision. For example, if a group of amateurs were left on a deserted island, their interactions would eventually lead to the creation of a market mechanism.

The Austrian School promotes an economic and social way of thinking that is not trapped in unrealistic, mostly mathematical models. It does not view the economy as an object of state political regulation and central, almost engineering-like control. Instead, its analysis focuses on autonomous entrepreneurial action and the free interaction of individuals in the marketplace.

The Austrian School's economic theory is grounded in verbal logic, which provides relief from the technical mumbo jumbo of mainstream economics. It emphasizes the process by which market participants gain information and form their expectations to lead them to their own idea of the best solution. This is in contrast to the neoclassical economic theory of perfect competition, which defines a competitive market as one in which there are a large number of small firms, all selling a homogeneous good and possessing perfect knowledge.

The Austrian School stresses the importance of competitive markets and a price system in organizing a decentralized morass of economic agents with limited knowledge into a harmonious order. This goes directly against the views of Marxian and Keynesian economists.

According to the Austrian School, an individual's action takes place through time. A person decides on a desired end, chooses a means to attain that end, and then acts to attain it. However, because all individuals act under the condition of uncertainty, especially regarding the plans and actions of other individuals, people sometimes do not achieve their desired ends. The actions of one person may interfere with the actions of another. The actual consequences of any action can only be known after the action has taken place.

The most important economic problem that people face, according to Austrian economists, is how to coordinate their plans with those of other people. For example, why is an apple available to buy at a store when someone goes to purchase it? This meshing of individual plans in a world of uncertainty is, to Austrians, the basic economic problem. Austrians stress uncertainty in economic decision-making rather than relying on "Homo economicus" or the rational man, who is fully informed of all circumstances impinging on his decisions. The fact that perfect knowledge never exists means that all economic activity implies risk.

Frequently asked questions