Austria's Involvement In The Crimean War: Why And What?

The Crimean War was fought between October 1853 and February 1856 by an alliance of the Ottoman Empire, France, the United Kingdom, and Sardinia-Piedmont against the Russian Empire. Austria did not join the war, although it was a member of the Holy Alliance with Russia. Russia had expected Austria to remain neutral or even join the war on its side, as Russia had helped Austria put down the Hungarian Revolution of 1848. However, Austria supported British and French demands that Russia withdraw its troops from the Danubian Principalities.

Austria's decision not to join Russia in the war was influenced by its opposition to Russian expansion in Europe and its interest in weakening Russia's position in the Balkans. Austria's neutrality forced Russia to keep a large number of troops near its borders, and Austria's mobilisation of its army along the Russian border posed a significant threat to Russia.

Austria's stance in the Crimean War had important implications for its diplomatic relations. Russia was furious with Austria's refusal to support it, viewing it as a betrayal, and this led to a rupture in their alliance. Austria found itself diplomatically isolated after the war, and its position contributed to its expulsion from territories in Germany and Italy and the need to divide power with Hungary.

Austria's neutrality in the war

Austria's neutrality in the Crimean War was a hostile one towards Russia. While Austria did not declare war on Russia, it was supportive of the Anglo-French coalition. This stance angered Tsar Nicholas I of Russia and damaged Russo-Austrian relations.

Austria's neutrality was influenced by its opposition to Russian expansion in Europe. The country also felt threatened by the presence of Russian troops in the Balkans. In February 1854, Britain and France demanded that Russia withdraw its forces from the Danubian Principalities, and Austria supported them. When Russia rejected this ultimatum, Britain and France used it to justify entering the war.

Austria's stance during the Crimean War ultimately damaged its diplomatic relations. Having abandoned its alliance with Russia, Austria found itself diplomatically isolated following the war. Russia then stood aside as Austria was evicted from the Italian and German states. This contributed to Austria's defeat in the 1866 Austro-Prussian War and the loss of its influence in German-speaking lands.

Austria's neutrality in the Crimean War can be understood in the context of its post-war history. Since 1955, the country has maintained a constitutionally-mandated status of neutrality. This commitment to neutrality is recognised internationally and has influenced Austria's political stance on the international stage, including during the Ukraine crisis.

The role of the Danubian Principalities

The Danubian Principalities were two regions, Moldavia and Wallachia, that emerged in the early 14th century. The term was coined in the Habsburg monarchy after the Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca in 1774. The Danubian Principalities were under the suzerainty of the Ottoman Empire from 1817.

In the mid-19th century, the Danubian Principalities became a major theatre of war in a series of confrontations between Russian, Habsburg, and Ottoman forces. In July 1853, Russian troops occupied the Danubian Principalities, which were then under Ottoman suzerainty. This occupation was a direct cause of the Crimean War, as the Ottoman Empire, with the support of its allies, demanded that Russia withdraw from the Principalities.

The Danubian Principalities were of strategic importance to the various powers involved in the Crimean War. The Russians wanted to control the Danube and sought guarantees of their position in Italy from France and Britain. The Habsburgs, or Austrians, were concerned about Russian troops in the Balkans and wanted to prevent further Russian expansion in Europe. The Ottomans wanted to preserve their independence and territory, which were threatened by Russian expansionism.

During the war, the Danubian Principalities changed hands several times. Initially occupied by Russian troops, the Principalities were then occupied by Austrian forces for the duration of the war. After the war, the Principalities became largely independent, with the Treaty of Paris forbidding Russia to base warships in the Black Sea. This marked a turning point in the conflict, as Russia was forced to sue for peace.

Austria's stance towards Russia

In the years leading up to the Crimean War, Russia and Austria were allies, often united against the Ottomans and France. Both countries were absolutist monarchies and shared ideological solidarity in the face of the French Revolution. Russia had also assisted Austria in suppressing the Hungarian Revolution of 1848. In return, Austria recognised Tsar Nicholas I's role as a special guardian of the Orthodox Christians in Moldavia and Wallachia, who were legally treated as second-class citizens of the Ottoman Empire.

However, when the Crimean War broke out in October 1853, Austria's stance shifted. Austria felt threatened by the Russian troops in the Balkans and opposed their occupation of the Danubian Principalities (now part of Romania). In February 1854, Britain and France demanded that Russia withdraw its forces from these principalities, and Austria supported them. When Russia rejected this ultimatum, Britain and France declared war. Although Austria did not join them, it refused to guarantee its neutrality, which proved to be the justification that Britain and France used to enter the war.

During the war, Austria remained neutral but was politically close to the Ottoman Empire. It attempted to make Russia negotiate and pushed for reasonable armistice conditions. In June 1854, an agreement was reached between Austria and the Ottoman Empire, and Austrian troops occupied the Romanian principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia, which had been occupied by Russia since the beginning of the war. This action further strained Russo-Austrian relations and meant that Russia had to fight against almost all of Europe in the battlefield and in diplomacy.

In the long run, it was Austria that lost the most from the Crimean War despite having barely taken part in it. Having abandoned its alliance with Russia, Austria was diplomatically isolated following the war. Russia did nothing to assist its former ally, and Austria suffered disastrous defeats in subsequent wars, ultimately losing its influence in most German-speaking lands.

The impact of the war on Austria's relations with other European powers

Austria's stance during the Crimean War had a significant impact on its relations with other European powers. By refusing to support Russia and instead siding with Britain and France, Austria's relations with Russia were strained. This was particularly notable given that Russia had aided Austria in suppressing the Hungarian Revolution of 1848. Russia's Tsar, Nicholas I, viewed Austria's actions as a betrayal, damaging the previously strong relationship between the two nations.

Austria's actions during the Crimean War also impacted its standing with other European powers. By siding with Britain and France, Austria contributed to the isolation of Russia. This alignment further solidified as Austria, Britain, and France worked together to force Russia to withdraw its troops from the Danubian Principalities. This cooperation set the stage for future collaborations between Austria, Britain, and France, and placed Austria in a favourable position within Europe.

However, Austria's involvement in the Crimean War also had negative consequences for its relations with other powers. Prussia, for example, viewed Austria's actions as a threat to its own interests. Additionally, Austria's stance during the war contributed to its diplomatic isolation following the conflict. Without the support of Russia, Austria became vulnerable, ultimately leading to its expulsion from territories in Germany and Italy.

The Crimean War also influenced the complex dynamics between European powers, setting the stage for future conflicts. The war disrupted the balance of power in Europe, known as the "Concert of Europe," which had been established by the Congress of Vienna in 1815. The conflict between Austria and Russia weakened the Holy Alliance, which had previously united the two nations. This, in turn, contributed to rising tensions and shifting alliances among European powers, ultimately leading to World War I.

The consequences of the war for Russia

The Crimean War had far-reaching consequences for Russia, which suffered a humiliating defeat at the hands of an alliance between the Ottoman Empire, France, the United Kingdom, and Sardinia-Piedmont. The war weakened the Imperial Russian Army, drained the treasury, and undermined Russia's influence in Europe. Here are some key consequences of the war for Russia:

Military Weakness and Reform:

The war exposed the profound weaknesses of the Russian military, which was technologically backward, poorly organised, and suffered from corruption and inefficiency. As a result, Russia embarked on a programme of sweeping military reforms to modernise its armed forces, including improvements in weapons, tactics, and logistics.

Economic Impact:

The war drained Russia's treasury, and the country was nearly bankrupt by the war's end. The economic burden was exacerbated by the need to compensate landowners and the increased debt and budget deficit caused by military expenditures.

Loss of Influence:

Russia's defeat in the Crimean War undermined its influence in Europe, particularly in the Balkans and the Ottoman Empire, which had long been within Russia's sphere of influence. The Treaty of Paris, which ended the war, further diminished Russia's standing by forbidding it from basing warships in the Black Sea. This restriction was a significant blow to Russia's naval power and its ability to project force in the region.

Domestic Reforms:

The war's consequences extended beyond foreign policy, prompting Russia to address internal issues. The realisation of military defeat and technological inferiority sparked a recognition of the need for fundamental domestic reforms. This included the abolition of serfdom, overhauls of the justice system, improvements in education, and changes to local self-government and military service.

Catalyst for Change:

The Crimean War served as a catalyst for Russia to address its problems and pursue rapid modernisation to restore its status as a European power. This period of reform and industrialisation, known as the Great Reforms, was aimed at strengthening Russia's social and political institutions.

Long-Term Impact:

The war's impact extended beyond the immediate consequences, contributing to Russia's adoption of a more aggressive expansionist policy in Asia. Additionally, the war's outcome facilitated the unification of Germany under Prussian control and the rise of France as the dominant military land power in Europe, reshaping the balance of power on the continent.

Frequently asked questions